Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Int J Med Inform ; 78(5): 321-9, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19117798

ABSTRACT

CONTENT AND OBJECTIVE: Health professionals now routinely use electronic knowledge resources (EKRs). Few studies have considered EKR-related tensions which may arise in a clinical decision-making context. The present study aims to explore three types of tension: (1) user-computer tension, (2) social tensions, and (3) organizational tensions (constraints associated with organizational routines and health policies). DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, SETTING: We conducted a multiple case study, examining Family Medicine residents' searches for information in everyday life. Cases were defined as critical searches for information among 17 first year family medicine residents using InfoRetriever 2003/2004 on a PDA over 1.5 months at McGill University. InfoRetriever-derived information was used within a resident-patient decision-making context in 84 of 156 cases. For each case, residents were interviewed, and extracts of interview transcripts were assigned to themes using specialized software (presence of tension; type of tension). Further computer-assisted lexical-semantic analysis was performed on transcripts. Authors reached consensus on assignments. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases with tension were identified (one case had two types of tension), and illustrate the above mentioned types of tensions: (T1) tension between the resident and InfoRetriever (N=16); (T2) InfoRetriever-related tension between the resident and other social actors, specifically supervisors, other health care professionals and patients (N=7); (T3) InfoRetriever-related tension between the resident and the health organization/system (N=3). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest EKR usage in a clinical decision-making context may have negative consequences when three types of tension arise in a clinical decision-making context. Illustrated types of tension are interrelated and not mutually exclusive. Awareness of EKR-related tensions may help clinicians to integrate EKRs in practice.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Medical Informatics , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Cohort Studies , Quebec
2.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 10(3): 413-30, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15304142

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Information retrieval technology tends to become nothing less than crucial in physician daily practice, notably in family medicine. Nevertheless, few studies examine impacts of this technology and their results appear controversial. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Our article aims to explore these impacts using the medical literature, an organizational case study and the literature on organizations. METHODS: The case study was embedded in an evaluation of the implementation of medical and pharmaceutical databases on handheld computers in a Canadian family medicine centre. Six physicians were interviewed on specific events relative to the use of these databases and on their general perception of impacts of this use on clinical decision making and the doctor-patient relationship. A thematic data analysis was performed concomitantly by both authors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Findings indicate six types of impact: practice improvement, reassurance, learning, confirmation, recall and frustration. These findings are interpreted in accordance with both a medical and organizational perspective. The fit with the literature on inter-organizational memory supports the transferability of the findings. In turn, this fit suggests how information retrieval technology may change physician routine. This study suggests a new basis for evaluating the impact of information retrieval technology in daily clinical practice. In conclusion, our paper encourages policy-makers to develop, and physicians to use, this technology.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/organization & administration , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Canada , Computers, Handheld , Interviews as Topic , Organizational Case Studies
3.
J Fam Pract ; 41(5): 473-81, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7595266

ABSTRACT

To critically assess and summarize the beneficial effects of benzodiazepine therapy for insomnia in community-dwelling elders, a systematic search was undertaken to review all published clinical trials and sleep laboratory studies. The risk of injury for benzodiazepine users was also reviewed. Ten studies met inclusion criteria for assessing benefit. There are no studies regarding the long-term effectiveness of benzodiazepines for the treatment of sleep disorders in the elderly. In the sleep laboratory setting, triazolam 0.125 mg, flurazepam 15 mg, and estazolam 1 mg improved sleep latency by 27 to 30 minutes and increased total sleep time by 47 to 81 minutes for the first 2 to 3 nights of treatment, compared with baseline measurements taken while the patients were receiving placebo. In contrast to these modest short-term benefits, there is an association between the use of benzodiazepines with a long half-life, eg, flurazepam, diazepam, and chlordiazepoxide, and an increased risk of hip fracture in the elderly. Triazolam can cause rebound insomnia as well as anterograde amnesia. Clinicians should discontinue their prescribing of long-acting benzodiazepines for elderly patients with insomnia. More research is needed on the effects of nondrug interventions as well as on short- and intermediate-acting benzodiazepines, such as oxazepam and temazepam, to treat insomnia in community-dwelling elderly.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Hip Fractures/etiology , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk , Sleep/drug effects
4.
CMAJ ; 150(11): 1801-9, 1994 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8199957

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of questionable and rational high-risk prescribing among elderly people of the three drug groups most commonly implicated in drug-related illness: cardiovascular drugs, psychotropic drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). DESIGN: Retrospective prevalence study; all prescription and billing records for the period Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1990, for the study sample were retrieved from the relevant provincial databases of the Régie de l'assurance-maladie du Québec. SETTING: Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Regionally stratified random sample of 63,268 elderly medicare registrants who made at least one visit to physician in 1990 and were not living in a health care institution for the entire year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prescription information was examined for three types of high-risk prescribing: rational and questionable drug combinations, excessive treatment duration and drugs relatively contraindicated for use in elderly people. RESULTS: Overall, 52.6% of the patients experienced one or more events of high-risk prescribing, and 45.6% experienced at least one that was questionable. High-risk prescribing was most prevalent for psychotropic drugs, and questionable prescribing was more frequent than rational prescribing in this drug group. An estimated 30.8% of the total elderly population in Quebec received benzodiazepines for more than 30 consecutive days, 12.9% received a long-acting benzodiazepine, and 13.0% received a questionable high-risk psychotropic drug combination. The prevalence of high-risk prescribing was higher among the women than among the men and increased with age until 75 to 84 years. There were significant unexplained differences between regions in the regional prevalence of high-risk prescribing, particularly of psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of questionable high-risk prescribing, especially of psychotropic drugs, is substantial among elderly people. This may be a potentially important and avoidable risk factor for drug-related illness in elderly people.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization Review , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Quebec , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
6.
CMAJ ; 144(10): 1257-61, 1991 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2025821

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outpatients 75 years of age or older have a higher rate of inadequate bowel preparation for barium enema and of complications associated with the preparation and the test than patients aged 55 to 74 years. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Radiology department in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients 55 years or older referred for a barium enema from March to August 1988. OUTCOME MEASURES: All films were reviewed independently by a study radiologist blind to the staff radiologist's report. Patients were interviewed by telephone within several days after the test to assess the occurrence of problems during the preparation or the test. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 213 patients assessed 72 were excluded: 43 refused to participate or could not be contacted, 16 had previously undergone colonic surgery, and 13 were excluded for other reasons. The remaining 141 patients were separated into three age groups: those 55 to 64 years (46 patients), those 65 to 74 (47) and those 75 or older (48). In 104 cases (74%) the bowel had been prepared adequately; there was no significant difference between the three groups with regard to the adequacy of preparation. The incidence of problems reported by the patients did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatients aged 75 years or more are no more likely than those aged 55 to 74 to have problems with bowel preparation or the barium enema itself. Age should not be a criterion for exclusion from barium enema. To try to lower the rate of poor bowel preparation clinicians and radiologists should consider counselling patients more carefully about the importance of proper preparation. Also, the current method of preparation could be examined to determine whether simple changes would significantly improve colon cleanliness.


Subject(s)
Barium Sulfate , Enema/standards , Patient Compliance , Aged , Bisacodyl/administration & dosage , Citrates/administration & dosage , Citric Acid , Female , Gallium/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
7.
Can Med Assoc J ; 131(8): 932, 935, 1984 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6488122
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...