ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48). CONCLUSION: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast/radiation effects , Mastectomy, Segmental/psychology , Medical Oncology , Patient Satisfaction , Radiation Injuries/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cicatrix/pathology , Cicatrix/psychology , Esthetics/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Nipples/pathology , Nipples/radiation effects , Observer Variation , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skin Pigmentation/radiation effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force subjective, objective, management, and analytic (LENT/SOMA) scores were compared in a group of breast cancer patients. The impact of the classification system on grading late effects was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Telangiectasia, skin pigmentation, and fibrosis were scored according to both LENT/SOMA and RTOG criteria. The results were compared with respect to up- or downgrading and correlated (Spearman's rho). Other side effects were recorded using LENT/SOMA criteria. Interobserver variability was calculated with Cohen's kappa. Two hundred fifty-nine subsequent relapse-free patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy between 1981 and 1995 were examined. The median dose of radiotherapy to the breast was 55 Gy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 31 patients and tamoxifen to 52 patients. The median follow-up was 8 years. RTOG skin and s.c. tissue scales and LENT/SOMA breast and pigmentation scales were used. Two doctors examined 45 patients jointly. RESULTS: Of all patients, 20% had telangiectasia, 22% pigmentation, 43% fibrosis, 4% breast edema, 77% retraction/atrophy, and 54% pain. In comparison, when LENT/SOMA criteria were used, telangiectasia and pigmentation were upgraded in 34% and 36%, respectively, and telangiectasia was downgraded in 45%. Fibrosis correlated well (Spearman's rho 0.78, p = 0.01). An additional 356 side effects, mainly retraction/atrophy were observed in 226 patients using LENT/SOMA criteria. Interobserver variability was similar for both classification systems and ranged from Cohen's kappa 0.3 (retraction) to 0.91 (telangiectasia). CONCLUSIONS: LENT/SOMA criteria seem to be the better tool in grading and recording late radiation toxicity compared with the RTOG scale. There was some upgrading with the RTOG score when skin toxicity is evaluated. In contrast, fibrosis scores correlated very well. Adjustments of the LENT/SOMA scoring system should be considered to standardize reporting of late radiation morbidity.
