Presence and size of synovial masses within the navicular bursa correlate well between magnetic resonance imaging and bursoscopy and have a guarded prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Focal hyperintense lesions within the navicular bursa emanating from the dorsal border of the deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) can be recognised on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI) and have been attributed to lameness in horses. Removal of these lesions, also referred to as synovial masses, by navicular bursoscopy is currently recommended. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between MRI and navicular bursoscopic findings. It is hypothesised that the prognosis following surgery is proportional to the size of the DDFT lesion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical records. METHODS: Horses undergoing standing low-field MRI and navicular bursoscopy with >1 year follow-up were included. A grading system was developed to classify the size of synovial mass(es) and lesion(s) of the DDFT on MRI and at surgery. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between MRI findings and surgery and between outcome and severity of the tendon injury. RESULTS: Fifty-nine horses presenting over a 15-year period (2006-2021) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ninety navicular bursae were examined both on MRI and endoscopically. There was strong correlation between the size of synovial masses and tendon lesions on MRI and bursoscopy (p < 0.001, OR: 25.61, 95% CI 8.71-75.29 and p < 0.001, OR: 7.34, 95% CI 2.70-19.92, respectively). Size of tendon lesion and synovial mass had no impact on prognosis (p = 0.3, OR: 1, 95% CI 1-1 and p = 0.1, OR: 1, 95% CI 1-1, respectively), which was guarded (30.5% return to previous level of exercise). MAIN LIMITATIONS: Performance data for conservatively treated horses with MRI-detected synovial masses was not considered, nor was the effect of navicular bursal effusion. Horses were not randomly assigned to treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: There is good correlation between MRI and bursoscopic findings of DDFT lesions and synovial masses within the navicular bursa, with no false positives. Size of the synovial masses and DDFT lesions does not influence prognosis following navicular bursoscopy.

Acceptability and feasibility of an interprofessional end-of-life/palliative care educational intervention in the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe a seven hour End-of-Life/Palliative Care educational intervention including online content related to symptom management, communication and decision-making capacity and an in-person group integration activity, from the perspective of the interprofessional team in terms of its acceptability and feasibility. RESEARCH DESIGN: A mixed-methods study design was used. SETTING AND SAMPLE: The study was conducted in a medical-surgical Intensive Care Unit in Montreal, Canada. The sample consisted of 27 clinicians of the Intensive Care Unit interprofessional team who completed the End-of-Life/Palliative Care educational intervention, and participated in focus groups and completed a self-administered questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were the acceptability and feasibility of the educational intervention. FINDINGS: The intervention was perceived to be appropriate and suitable in providing clinicians with knowledge and skills in symptom management and communication through self-reflection and self-evaluation, provision of assessment tools and promotion of interprofessional teamwork. The online format was more feasible, but the in-person group activity was key for the integration of knowledge and the promotion of interprofessional discussions. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that an interprofessional educational intervention integrating on-line content with in-person training has the potential to support clinicians in providing quality End-of-Life/Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.

BiVADs: a bridge to the future for patients and their families: the art and science of nursing combined in the face of technology.

Approximately 500,000 Canadians live with heart failure (Ross et al., 2006). These numbers continue to rise due to advancing technology and successes in treating cardiac conditions and potentially fatal events such as myocardial infarctions. According to Carrier (2005), individuals with damaged hearts are living longer, and lives are being successfully saved with the surge of cardiovascular assist devices developed in recent years, which are increasingly used as a bridge to transplant. Despite the lifesaving capabilities of ventricular-assist devices, these innovations pose risks and complications that can be debilitating for patients and their families (Carrier, 2005). As this complex trajectory is navigated, nurses provide care and support to the patient and family while playing a unique role in the assessment and monitoring of these devices. A family-centred nursing model provides a framework for practice when nursing patients and families are in crisis. The foundations of the McGill Model of Nursing are focused on a strengths-based approach, revolving around collaboration between patients, family resources, and tailored interventions (Gottlieb & Feeley, 2005). As students placed in a critical care setting, we began to realize the complexity of care required to nurse these patients and their families. In this paper, a case study is used to describe and share our learning experiences of caring for a patient with a biventricular assist device, as well as the principles that guided our interventions.