Concentration-controlled or effect-controlled trials: useful alternatives to conventional dose-controlled trials?

Historically, dose-finding trials have been confirmatory in nature despite the fact that these trials represent an important and essential 'learning' phase in the drug development process. About 10 years ago 2 alternatives to the randomised dose-controlled trial (RDCT) were proposed as being more informative trial types. Controlling systemic drug exposure in order to improve efficiency of a trial forms the basis for the suggestion of a randomised concentration-controlled trial (RCCT). For the common instance where pharmacodynamic variability is larger than pharmacokinetic variability, the randomised effect-controlled trial (RECT), where patients are randomised to the effect of interest was suggested as even more informative. A survey of the literature shows that the RCCT has been sparsely applied and RECT not at all. For RCCT, the practical complications of carrying out the study seldom makes it the study type of choice. For RECT, the limited number of suitable situations for its application and the fact that the same effect is used for randomisation and analysis may explain the lack of applications. As a somewhat more favourable trial type, we suggest the randomised biomarker-controlled trial (RBCT), where patients are randomised to a certain value or range of a biomarker whereas the analysis is performed on another, clinically more relevant, effect. Although the RBCT has some attractive features, for example contributing to validation of a biomarker as a surrogate for clinical outcome, it is unlikely to be extensively used. Instead, the main shift from confirming to learning in dose-finding trials is coming from the incorporation of well-known learning components into the RDCT (e.g. sparse concentration measurements combined with population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, biomarker measurements and analysis of effect measures throughout the entire trial period).

Subjective gastrointestinal tolerability of acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol after single dose treatment.

UNLABELLED: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, two center, single-dose study was conducted to evaluate and compare the incidence of upper gastrointestinal complaints of acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol. 600 healthy volunteers received acetylsalicylic acid (2 effervescent tablets of 400 mg), paracetamol (2 effervescent tablets of 500 mg) or placebo (2 effervescent tablets) in three treatment groups. Subjects filled in a questionnaire at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after dosing to evaluate eight upper gastrointestinal symptoms, which were stomach pain, burning sensation, nausea, heartburn, gas, burping, indigestion and upset stomach. The primary study objective was to show equivalence between acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol. RESULTS: The absolute number of subjects reporting gastrointestinal intolerance were 50 of 200 in the placebo group, 46 of 200 in the paracetamol group and 56 of 201 in the acetylsalicylic acid group. The statistical test showed equivalence between both active substances. CONCLUSION: The rate of gastrointestinal intolerance following a single dose of two effervescent tablets of acetylsalicylic acid is equivalent to that of paracetamol and not different from gastrointestinal intolerance of placebo.

Saliva-resistant coating of tablets prevents oral release of penicillin: plasma but not saliva equivalence.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate saliva and plasma concentrations of penicillin after the intake of a conventional phenoxymethylpenicillin (PcV) tablet and a tablet with saliva-resistant coating (PcVsr), both containing 1 g penicillin. METHODS: The study had an open randomized crossover design and involved 24 healthy subjects. Saliva and blood were sampled intermittently for 6 h after tablet intake. RESULTS: Within the first 10 min after tablet intake penicillin was detected in saliva in ten subjects taking PcV and in none taking PcVsr (P < 0.001). These initial saliva concentrations were short-lasting, but in some subjects 50 to 100 times higher than those following the peak concentration in plasma, i.e. at 40 min or more after swallowing. From 40 min and onwards the saliva concentrations of penicillin were very similar for the two formulations. The elimination of high initial saliva concentrations may diminish ecological disturbances of the mouth flora as well as removing the unpleasant taste of penicillin. The plasma concentrations of penicillin were similar for the two formulations throughout the 6-h sampling period and the mean ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 99% for PcVsr in relation to PcV, the 90% confidence interval being 86-115%. The corresponding values for the maximum plasma concentration were 108% and 93 127%. The time to maximum concentration was 45 min for PcVsr and 41 min for PcV. Thus, with regard to standard criteria which are based on systemic (plasma) concentrations, the formulations were bioequivalent despite the substantial difference in initial local (saliva) concentrations. CONCLUSION: Saliva-resistant coating of tablets can prevent oral release of penicillin without affecting the plasma concentrations. From a clinical point of view both local and systemic equivalence should be established before bioequivalence is assumed.

A dose-response study comparing suppression of plasma cortisol induced by fluticasone propionate from Diskhaler and budesonide from Turbuhaler.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered via Diskhaler (FP-DH), and inhaled budesonide delivered via Turbuhaler (BUD-TBH) over the clinically recommended dose range using plasma cortisol suppression as a marker for systemic activity. METHODS: The systemic potency was examined in a dose-response study in 81 healthy male volunteers. The study was of an open, randomized, parallel-group (four groups) design, where two treatments were given in crossover fashion within each group. FP-DH and BUD-TBH were given b.i.d. for 7 days (14 doses): 100 and 100 micrograms (group 1); 200 and 200 micrograms (group 2); 500 and 400 micrograms (group 3); 1000 and 800 micrograms (group 4). There was a washout period of 7 days within each treatment group. All doses were administered at 08:00 and 20:00 hours. Multiple plasma cortisol samples were taken every 2 h over 24-h periods prior to randomization (baseline) and during steady state (i.e., the last two dosing intervals). Cortisol suppression was determined by comparing average plasma concentrations of cortisol before and during treatment. Dose-response curves for cortisol suppression were analyzed using multivariate non-linear regression (Hill modeling). RESULTS: Multiple dosing for 7 days with FP-DH and BUD-TBH resulted in dose-dependent cortisol suppression by both drugs, most pronounced at the two highest dose levels. FP-DH-induced suppression was 41% at 500 micrograms and 86% at 1000 micrograms b.i.d., while that induced by BUD-TBH was 19% at 400 micrograms and 47% at 800 micrograms b.i.d. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing the two steroids at these two dose levels. Doses producing 50% of maximum suppression (ED50) were estimated at 833 micrograms b.i.d. for BUD-TBH and 479 micrograms b.i.d. for FP-DH. This gave an estimated relative cortisol suppression over the dose range of 1.74:1 (FP-DH:BUD-TBH). ED50 values, estimated from cortisol concentrations at 08:00 hours (12 h after the last dose), were 1212 micrograms b.i.d. for BUD-TBH and 527 micrograms b.i.d. for FP-DH giving a relative cortisol suppression of 2.30:1 (FP-DH:BUD-TBH). Fourteen subjects on the highest FP-DH dose and 3 at the next highest dose had morning plasma cortisol levels below the lower reference limit. No subject taking budesonide, however, had morning plasma cortisol levels below the reference limit. Analysis of the time for return to pretreatment baseline levels showed that cortisol suppression, 12-24 h after the last dose, was statistically significant compared with the baseline for the highest dose of FP-DH but not for any of the BUD-TBH doses. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that FP-DH suppresses plasma cortisol more than BUD-TBH on a equivalent basis with regard to both magnitude and duration.

Moxonidine and cognitive function: interactions with moclobemide and lorazepam.

OBJECTIVE: Moxonidine represents a new generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs. It binds to I1-imidazoline receptors and exerts its antihypertensive activity through a reduction in systemic vascular resistance, while cardiac output remains unchanged or even increases slightly. Moxonidine is prescribed for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Typical doses are 0.4 to 2.0 mg given as one dose in the morning or as divided doses in the morning and evening. METHODS: The effects of moxonidine 0.4 mg once daily in combination with moclobemide or lorazepam were investigated in two, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover studies in a total of 48 healthy volunteers. Safety assessments were made in each study and included pre- and post-study measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, ECG, haematology, blood biochemistry, and urinalysis, and recording of adverse events. RESULTS: In the first study, moxonidine alone was found to produce small but statistically significant impairments of vigilance detection speed at 4 h and 6 h. Lowering of subjective alertness was also observed. Repeat dosing with moxonidine produced an impairment of memory scanning performance. These findings were not reproduced in the second study, in which moxonidine alone produced an improvement in immediate word recall at 4 h and 6 h. No interactions were observed when moxonidine was co-administered with moclobemide. Moxonidine, when co-administered with lorazepam, produced interactions with three tasks requiring high levels of attention: choice, simple reaction time and digit vigilance performance; memory tasks; immediate word recall, delayed word recall accuracy; and visual tracking. A total of 47 adverse events were reported in study 1. Moxonidine produced a slight decrease of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In study 2, a total of 55 adverse events were reported. In both trials, the most frequently reported events were tiredness and dryness of mouth, the latter occurring only under the moxonidine treatment. There were no clinically relevant changes observed in blood pressure, pulse rate, and laboratory tests in either study, nor was there any evidence of any interaction between moxonidine and either moclobemide or lorazepam. CONCLUSION: Moxonidine was found to be safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers. However, the impairments on attentional tasks were greater when moxonidine was co-administered with lorazepam 1 mg. These effects should be considered when moxonidine is codosed with lorazepam, although they were smaller than would have been produced by a single dose of lorazepam 2 mg.

Intragastric pH after oral administration of single doses of ranitidine effervescent tablets, omeprazole capsules and famotidine fast-dissolving tablets to fasting healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic effect of drugs inhibiting acid production on acid-related discomforts is related to both the onset and duration of action of the drug. The effects on gastric pH by single oral doses of some acid-inhibiting drugs were investigated by measuring daytime (morning to lunch) intragastric pH in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This randomized, single-dose, 4-way crossover study included 15 healthy fasting subjects. Effervescent ranitidine tablets 150 and 300 mg, fast-dissolving famotidine tablets 20 mg and capsules of omeprazole 20 mg were administered. Measurements of intragastric pH were performed every 4 s for 10 min prior to drug administration and during the following 4 h. RESULTS: The effervescent ranitidine tablets (150 or 300 mg) produced similar changes in intragastric pH: following an immediate increase to about pH 5, intragastric pH decreased slightly over the next 10-20 min. Thereafter pH increased steadily, reaching pH 4 after 20-40 min and pH 6 after about 70 min. After famotidine, pH 4 was reached after 80 min, significantly slower than ranitidine. After omeprazole, pH 3 was never reached. Ranitidine 150 and 300 mg showed significantly larger integrated pH responses over the 4-h observation period, compared to famotidine (P = 0.0288 and 0.0074) or omeprazole (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After single-dose administration to healthy fasting volunteers), ranitidine effervescent tablets showed a significantly more rapid onset of action and a significantly larger integrated pH response compared to either famotidine 20 mg fast-dissolving tablets or omeprazole 20 mg capsules.

Adverse effects of cosmetics and toiletries reported to the Swedish Medical Products Agency 1989-1994.

In Sweden, a cosmetic control system was introduced in 1989 at the Medical Products Agency (MPA). It consists of a register of importers, manufacturers and their products, and a voluntary adverse reaction reporting system identical to that concerning drugs. Between 1989 and 1994, MPA evaluated 191 reports concerning adverse effects of 253 cosmetics and toiletries. 90% of the reports concerned women and the top-ranking product category was moisturizers, followed by hair care products and nail products. The majority of the adverse effects reported involved only the skin, and 90% were eczematous reactions. 70% of the eczemas were classified as contact allergic, as patch tests were positive to the product as is, and in 1/2 of these products, 1 or more relevant allergens could be identified when tests were made with individual cosmetic ingredients. The most common offending ingredients were fragrances, toluenesulfonamide-formaldehyde resin and preservatives. The number of reports is small in relation to the expected number of cosmetic adverse effects, which can be explained by under-reporting. Efforts are being made to persuade Swedish physicians to report more often.

An assessment of the systemic effects of single and repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and inhaled budesonide in healthy volunteers.

The systemic effects of single and multiple doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide were examined in 24 healthy male volunteers (age range 18-29 years). The study was of an open, placebo-controlled, randomized, three-way crossover design. On each study day, multiple blood samples were taken over a 20 h period after drug administration (after a single dose and after the last of seven doses) and area under the curve (AUC(0-20)) for plasma cortisol and white blood cell (WBC) counts was calculated. RESULTS. The present study shows that multiple dosing with FP 1.0 mg b.i.d. for 3.5 days (seven doses) resulted in a marked cortisol suppression from placebo which, at 55%, was more than double that seen with a single dose (25% suppression). Multiple dosing with budesonide 0.8 mg b.i.d. resulted in a 34% suppression in plasma cortisol compared with a suppression of 26% with a single dose. The increase in systemic activity of FP after multiple dosing is confirmed by both the number of subjects with 0800 hours plasma cortisol values below normal limits and by the changes in WBC and differential counts. CONCLUSION. The results of the present study confirm previous findings with regard to the more marked systemic effect of FP following multiple dosing as compared with a single dose. This increase in systemic effect from single dosing to multiple dosing is significantly greater for FP than for budesonide.

The influence of food intake on the effect of two controlled release formulations of furosemide.

Differences in the urinary excretion rate of furosemide may explain discrepancies observed between the bioavailability and the total diuretic effect of different formulations of this drug. Furosemide was given at a dose of 60 mg as two oral controlled release (CR) formulations (FR and LR), with and without breakfast, in a randomized, four-treatment, four-period, crossover design to 28 healthy volunteers. Urinary volume, and contents of furosemide and sodium, were measured in samples taken over 24 h. The extent and rate of absorption of furosemide from FR were decreased after breakfast as compared to fasting: the mean (SD) of total furosemide excreted decreased from 11.38 (3.12) to 7.73 (1.67) mg, p < 0.0001, and the median (range) mean residence time increased from 6.3 (4.1-9.3) to 9.5 (5.9-11.8) h, p < 0.001. On the other hand, the extent of absorption of LR was increased after breakfast, from 8.04 (3.32) to 9.45 (1.83) mg, p < 0.05, without a significant change in MRT. FR had a higher extent and rate of absorption than LR during fasting, but its extent of absorption was lower than that of LR in the postprandial state. Interestingly, the total fraction of furosemide absorbed, as estimated from total furosemide excretion, was not correlated with the total diuresis (r2 = 0.079) and the differences in drug response compared among the four periods were much smaller than would be expected from the differences in amount absorbed. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in urinary excretion rate of furosemide and, related to this, differences in efficiency profiles between the four treatments. Therefore, the urinary excretion profile of a formulation of furosemide may be more important for the cumulated drug effect than the amount absorbed.

An assessment of the systemic activity of single doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers.

1. The systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), administered via Diskhaler, on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis were assessed primarily by measuring plasma cortisol at frequent intervals for 20 h after drug administration. 2. FP showed a dose-related suppression of plasma cortisol measured as area under the plasma cortisol vs time curve (AUC 0-20). The cortisol suppression (expressed as % fall from placebo) was 8, 19, and 28% for single doses of 250 micrograms FP, 500 micrograms FP and 1000 micrograms FP, respectively. A single dose of budesonide, 800 micrograms (via Turbuhaler), resulted in a 16% cortisol suppression. The cortisol suppression for all three single doses of FP, and for the single dose of budesonide, was statistically significantly different from placebo. 3. Repeated dosing of FP (1000 micrograms twice daily for 3.5 days) resulted in a more marked plasma cortisol suppression; a fall of 65% from placebo (AUC FP 1000 mg twice daily vs AUC placebo, P < 0.001). 4. In a well-controlled study in healthy volunteers, inhaled FP, in therapeutic doses, was shown to exhibit systemic effects which appear to be more pronounced after repeated dosing.

Doxycycline carrageenate--an improved formulation providing more reliable absorption and plasma concentrations at high gastric pH than doxycycline monohydrate.

The effect of increased gastric pH (obtained by pre-treatment with omeprazole) on the bioavailability of doxycycline monohydrate and doxycycline carrageenate has been investigated in 24 healthy volunteers, using an open, randomised, four-treatment, four-period, cross-over, 2 x 2 factorial design. Each subject received a single dose of 100 mg of each of the doxycycline formulations with and without pre-treatment with omeprazole (40 mg daily for 7 days). The two formulations were bioequivalent (rate and extent) during fasting without omeprazole pre-treatment, whereas after omeprazole, the monohydrate showed a highly significant decrease in bioavailability (38% for AUC and 45% for Cmax) compared to the carrageenate formulation, which was not affected by prior administration of omeprazole. Many of the subjects did not reach a therapeutic plasma level of doxycycline during the combination of omeprazole and doxycycline monohydrate, and most adverse events (mainly gastrointestinal) were reported after this combination. As large populations of patients have a high gastric pH due to frequent use of H2-blockers, proton pump inhibitors and antacids, as well as to physiological achlorhydria, the decreased absorption of doxycycline monohydrate may well have a clinical impact, for example when the patients are treated with tetracyclines for an infection.

Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I given subcutaneously to healthy volunteers and to patients with growth hormone receptor deficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) were studied in healthy volunteers and in patients with growth hormone receptor deficiency (GHRD; Laron syndrome). Following single subcutaneous injections of rhIGF-I, 40 and 80 micrograms/kg, to healthy volunteers, the peptide was absorbed slowly, with a maximum concentration reached after about 7 hours. Following daily multiple subcutaneous injections of rhIGF-I, 40 micrograms/kg, trough concentrations of IGF-I were increased by 277 +/- 50 micrograms/l (mean +/- SD) from baseline. IGF-I was thus characterized as a low-clearance peptide, with a clearance and half-life estimated at about 0.20 ml/minute/kg and 20 hours, respectively, in healthy volunteers. The volume of distribution was low, about 0.20-0.36 litres/kg, the bioavailability of subcutaneously administered rhIGF-I was 100%, and the rate of production of IGF-I was estimated to be about 50 micrograms/kg/day (3.5 mg/day). Patients with GHRD had low baseline IGF-I concentrations (30-50 micrograms/l) and a much more rapid turnover of IGF-I compared with that in healthy volunteers. The clearance and half-life of IGF-I were estimated to be about 0.60 ml/minute/kg and 6 hours, respectively. The volume of distribution was about the same as in healthy subjects. Due to the rapid turnover of IGF-I, trough IGF-I concentrations were increased to just above baseline during subcutaneous injections of 40 micrograms/kg once daily for 7 days. The maximum increase in IGF-I levels was 111 +/- 12 micrograms/l and 150 +/- 3 micrograms/l following daily subcutaneous injections of 40 x 1 and 40 x 2 micrograms/kg for 7 days, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam after oral and intravenous dosing in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were studied in 18 young subjects, from 21 to 36 years of age, and 18 elderly subjects, ranging in age from 65 to 76 years. Nine men and 9 women per age group were studied in a randomized three-way crossover design. Single doses of one 30-mg adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablet, one 30-mg immediate release tablet, and 15 mg of intravenous adinazolam mesylate were administered. Plasma adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and psychomotor performance tests, including digit-symbol substitution and two card-sorting tasks, were performed. An effect index, defined as the maximal performance decrement divided by N-desmethyladinazolam maximum plasma concentration was calculated as a measure of sensitivity to these effects. Adinazolam oral and systemic clearances were reduced approximately 30% and 25%, respectively, in elderly volunteers. Adinazolam half-life was prolonged approximately 40% in the elderly after oral dosing. N-Desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations and half-life were increased approximately 40% in elderly volunteers. Psychomotor performance decrements were observed following all treatments; decrements were lowest following sustained release tablets and intravenous adinazolam. Maximal performance decrements in elderly subjects were approximately twice those observed in young subjects. No significant influence of age on the effect index for digit-symbol substitution was evident. Effect indices for card-sorting tests were significantly higher in the elderly. Lower clearances of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam are observed in elderly volunteers, and increased N-desmethyladinazolam levels contribute to increased psychomotor performance decrements in elderly subjects. Results also suggest that elderly subjects may be more sensitive to certain cognitive effects of N-desmethyladinazolam.

Discrepancy between bioavailability as estimated from urinary recovery of frusemide and total diuretic effect.

1. Frusemide was given at a dose of 60 mg as two oral controlled release (CR) formulations and as plain tablets in a randomised, balanced, three way cross over design to 26 healthy volunteers. Urinary volume, and contents of frusemide, sodium, chloride and potassium were measured in samples taken over 24 h. 2. There was a marked difference between the CR formulations on one hand and the plain tablets on the other, in excretion of frusemide and diuresis vs time. The total diuretic/saluretic effect was only marginally lower (19 and 28% respectively, P less than 0.05) after CR compared with plain tablets although the fraction absorbed was markedly decreased (39 and 51% lower, respectively, P less than 0.05), estimated as urinary recovery of frusemide. The total diuresis of the two CR formulations did not differ although the urinary recovery was significantly different (P less than 0.05). 3. The diuretic effect vs frusemide excretion rate showed minimal counter-clockwise hysteresis after plain tablets while the CR formulations produced clockwise hysteresis indicating tolerance. 4. In agreement with the concept of efficiency, the higher diuretic/saluretic effect per amount of excreted frusemide may be a consequence of the slower output of frusemide in urine with the CR formulations compared with plain tablets. The major part of the pharmacological effect was produced with a higher efficiency after CR compared with plain tablets. It should be noted that the pharmacokinetics of a drug and its pharmacodynamic potency independently determine the total response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of ketotifen after oral administration to healthy male subjects.

The pharmacokinetics of 2 mg ketotifen from four different oral dosage forms were examined in two randomized, balanced cross-over studies. Forty healthy male subjects participated. Each of 20 subjects received two capsule formulations and each of the other 20 subjects received two syrup formulations. Ketotifen concentrations in plasma were determined by a modified GC-MS method. The limit of quantitation was 40 pg ml-1. Inter-day precision and accuracy calculated from quality control samples were 16.3 per cent (-1.9 per cent), 19.8 per cent (+4.5 per cent) and 23.6 per cent (+5.9 per cent) at plasma concentration levels of 86 (n = 18), 215 (n = 19) and 343 (n = 18) pg ml-1, respectively. Ketotifen was rapidly absorbed from all dosage forms reaching Cmax in the order of 400 pg ml-1 after the syrup formulations and 300 pg ml-1 after the capsule formulations within 2 to 4 h. The syrup formulations showed a significantly more rapid rate of absorption as assessed by Tmax. No significant differences in extent of absorption between dosage forms were observed. The terminal elimination half-life of ketotifen varied between subjects from 7 to 27 hours with a mean of about 12 h. The minor pharmacokinetic difference between dosage forms observed in this study is unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of controlled-release levodopa products.

The multiple-dose (200 mg levodopa t.i.d.) pharmacokinetic profile of two controlled-release products of levodopa (Madopar HBS and Sinemet CR) was compared to conventional Madopar capsules in 18 healthy volunteers in a cross-over, randomized design. A pronounced controlled-release profile of the Madopar HBS and Sinemet CR product was demonstrated compared to conventional Madopar capsules with a significant (p < 0.001) decrease (-40 and -55%) in Cmax and a significant (p < 0.001) increase (+237 and +256%) in morning Cmin for the 200 mg t.i.d. dosage schedule. Almost equivalent bioavailability (85-90%) of levodopa was demonstrated for the controlled-release formulations relative to that of conventional Madopar capsules. The Madopar HBS formulation was bioequivalent with Sinemet CR with respect to levodopa, but it exhibited a moderately higher fluctuation index compared to Sinemet CR as a result of somewhat higher Cmax and lower Cmin values for the Madopar HBS formulation. 3-OMD (a metabolite of levodopa) levels were significantly (p < 0.05) higher for Madopar HBS and Madopar compared to Sinemet CR. The higher 3-OMD levels for the levodopa/benserazide combinations are consistent with a more potent decarboxylase inhibitory activity of benserazide as compared to carbidopa. The number of adverse events was highest for conventional Madopar (n = 18) compared to the controlled-release formulations (n = 12 for Sinemet CR and only 2 for Madopar HBS). A more efficient inhibition of dopamine formation from levodopa (resulting in higher 3-OMD levels) by Madopar HBS was consistent with the superior tolerability (especially for initial nausea) observed for the Madopar HBS formulation as compared to Sinemet CR.

Nonlinearity of amoxicillin absorption kinetics in human.

Specialised gastrointestinal absorption of amoxicillin has been suggested in man and has been demonstrated in animals. In order to study the rate and extent of amoxicillin absorption, six healthy subjects were given 500 mg IV and two oral doses (500 mg and 3 g as a suspension). Absorption kinetics was analysed by compartmental modelling, noncompartmental methods and by calculation of absorption rates using deconvolution. Dose-dependency of the extent of amoxicillin absorption was observed, with a lower than expected mean maximum plasma concentration (49%), and fraction of the dose absorbed (39%) after the 3 g dose calculated from the 500 mg dose, assuming kinetic linearity. Zero-order kinetics of absorption was apparent in some subjects after the 500 mg dose, both from model fitting and absorption rate profile. However, no pattern consistent with pure first-order or zero-order absorption was observed after both oral doses in any individual. The dose-dependency of amoxicillin absorption was confirmed by a trend to an increased time of absorption for the high dose. The results show the variable nature and nonlinearity of the gastrointestinal absorption of amoxicillin and indicate the involvement of a number of factors, in addition to simple diffusion.

Pharmacokinetics of intraarticular indomethacin in patients with osteoarthritis.

The pharmacokinetics of intraarticular indomethacin was evaluated in 10 patients with osteoarthritis in an open labelled, randomized, cross-over study. Each patient received a single dose of 10 mg indomethacin by the intraarticular and the intravenous routes with a seven-day interval between the injections. Blood was repeatedly collected and urine was collected for 24 h after dosing. Indomethacin was rapidly absorbed from the joint, giving a maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of 0.60 micrograms.ml-1 approximately 1 h after dosing. The systemic bioavailability (f) was 80% and the mean absorption time (MAT) was about 2 h. The apparent terminal half-life and mean residence time (MRT) were 2.8 h and 4 h, respectively. The urinary recovery of total indomethacin (unchanged + glucuronides) was 24% of the dose and renal clearance (CLR) was estimated to be about 21 ml.min-1. The disposition of indomethacin after intravenous and intraarticular administration appeared to be similar. The results suggest that the intraarticular administration of indomethacin would not exclude the risk of developing untoward, systemic, concentration-dependent effects.