The impact of child-specific characteristics on warfarin dosing requirements.

Background: The influence of child characteristics on warfarin dosing has been reported; however, there is no consensus on the nature and extent of this effect. Objectives: To investigate the impacts of the demographic and clinical characteristics of children on the warfarin dose required to achieve a therapeutic international normalization ratio (INR). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included children aged 3 months to 14 years old who were prescribed warfarin for 3 months or longer with a "stable INR." The primary outcome was the total daily dose (TDD) and total weekly dose of warfarin required to achieve a therapeutic INR target. Results: We included 127 patients with a mean age of 7.7 ± 3.7 years and a median weight of 22 (IQR, 16-33) kg. Of the sample, 55 patients (43.3%) required a TDD of ≤0.1 mg/kg. The TDD for children younger than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and older than 10 years were 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg, 0.12 ± 0.05 mg/kg, and 0.096 ± 0.04 mg/kg, respectively (P = .002). Overweight and obese children required a smaller TDD than normal-weight children: 0.09 ± 0.05 vs 0.13 ± 0.05 mg/kg (P = .004), which was similar for underweight children. A lower body surface area (<0.5 m2) required a higher dose. All the other variables did not affect warfarin doses. The incidence of a subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic INR was independent of demographic or clinical variables. Conclusion: The study confirmed that the patient demographics affect the daily warfarin dose required to achieve the INR target. However, they do not have any predictive value for the incidence of out-of-range-INR.

Evaluation of Health Care Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice to Prevent the Pandemic Spread of COVID-19: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Abha, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) are at risk of transmitting the lethal COVID-19 virus globally and increasing its prevalence. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among HCPs in the Asir region for the first time. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional analysis with 491 healthcare professionals was tested using a pre-tested questionnaire in a tertiary care facility. The association between research variables and questions was determined using Chi-square tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Pharmacists and other HCPs exhibited good knowledge, a positive attitude, and a negative practice pattern regarding COVID-19. There was a strong association between knowledge and attitude (correlation coefficient: 0.17; p < 0.001). However, healthcare practitioners had a suboptimal practice score of 2.09 ± 0.62 regarding COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This study discovered that despite relatively insufficient practices for adherence to recommended techniques regarding COVID-19 prevention during the outbreak, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals have a high level of awareness and a positive attitude towards COVID-19 as a medical condition. There is a need for more involved HCPs, improved COVID-19 management training, and approaches to make healthcare providers feel less anxious.

Ribavirin and Interferon Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ribavirin and recombinant interferon (RBV/rIFN) therapy on the outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), accounting for time-varying confounders. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed MERS from 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia diagnosed between September 2012 and January 2018. We evaluated the association of RBV/rIFN with 90-day mortality and MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) RNA clearance using marginal structural modeling to account for baseline and time-varying confounders. RESULTS: Of 349 MERS patients, 144 (41.3%) patients received RBV/rIFN (RBV and/or rIFN-α2a, rIFN-α2b, or rIFN-ß1a; none received rIFN-ß1b). RBV/rIFN was initiated at a median of 2 days (Q1, Q3: 1, 3 days) from intensive care unit admission. Crude 90-day mortality was higher in patients with RBV/rIFN compared to no RBV/rIFN (106/144 [73.6%] vs 126/205 [61.5%]; P = .02]. After adjusting for baseline and time-varying confounders using a marginal structural model, RBV/rIFN was not associated with changes in 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .73-1.44]; P = .87) or with more rapid MERS-CoV RNA clearance (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, .30-1.44]; P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, RBV/rIFN (RBV and/or rIFN-α2a, rIFN-α2b, or rIFN-ß1a) therapy was commonly used in critically ill MERS patients but was not associated with reduction in 90-day mortality or in faster MERS-CoV RNA clearance.

Safe correction of severe hyponatremia in patient with severe renal failure using continuous venovenous hemofiltration with modified sodium content in the replacement fluid.

Optimal treatment of severe hyponatremia in patients requiring dialysis is not known. Rapid correction with the use of different dialysis modalities can lead to osmotic demyelination syndrome. We described a safe correction of severe hyponatremia in a 42-year-old male patient requiring dialysis, who was treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration using hypotonic replacement fluid which was prepared and adjusted on a daily basis.

Effect of Amantadine on Agitation in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the presence of agitation in traumatic brain injury patients treated with amantadine with those not treated with amantadine in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conduced in a trauma ICU of a tertiary care institution in the United States. Patients who received amantadine were compared with patients who did not receive amantadine. The primary outcome measure was the presence of agitation, defined as the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of +2 or higher. Secondary comparisons included haloperidol use, benzodiazepine use, opioid use, and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the study cohort (70 patients in the amantadine group, 69 patients in the no-amantadine group). There were more patients who had agitation in the amantadine group (38% vs 14%, P = 0.018). Patients who received amantadine received more opioids in fentanyl equivalents (10.3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 6.3-20.4] µg/kg vs 7.4 [IQR, 2.1-12.6] µg/kg, P = 0.009) and had a longer ICU length of stay (4.5 [IQR, 3-10] days vs 3 [IQR, 2-5] days, P = 0.010). Haloperidol use and benzodiazepine use were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The early use of amantadine after traumatic brain injury may increase the risk of agitation. This could increase opioid consumption and ICU length of stay.