Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Br J Neurosurg ; 37(4): 848-852, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31663376

ABSTRACT

Pleural effusions in children (PE) due to ventricle-peritoneal shunt (VPS) is very rare, with few cases reported. We present a new case of an infant with VPS who had a massive hydrothorax not associated with misplacement or migration of the distal catheter or with ascites. After the evacuation of the PE we managed the patient by adjusting the pressure of the adjustable valve (AV). Sequential thoracic ultrasounds showed a satisfactory outcome. We review the literature thoroughly and describe the possible pathophysiological mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Hydrothorax , Pleural Effusion , Humans , Child , Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Pleural Effusion/surgery , Hydrothorax/diagnostic imaging , Hydrothorax/etiology , Hydrothorax/surgery , Catheters , Ultrasonography
2.
Vacunas ; 21(2): 129-135, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32837461

ABSTRACT

The 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic can have an alarming impact on vaccination coverage. WHO, UNICEF and Gavi warn that at least 80 million children under the age of 1 are at risk of contracting diseases such as diphtheria, measles and polio due to the interruption of routine immunization and the temporary suspension of 93 campaigns of large-scale vaccination.In Spain, a new healthcare scenario, which prioritizes telematics over in person, fear of contagion by going to health centers, and recommendations for physical distance and restricted mobility, reduce attendance at primary care centers. Despite recommendations established by the health authorities, vaccination coverage has decreased in all Autonomous Communities between 5% and 60%, depending on the age and type of vaccine. School vaccinations have been suspended and only vaccination of pregnant women against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis has been maintained. The decrease has been more evident for non gratuity vaccines: the first dose of meningococcal vaccine B has decreased by 68.4% in the Valencian Community, and Andalusia has observed a 39% decrease in the total doses of this vaccine and of 18% for that of rotavirus.The recovering of vaccinations should be planned, organized and carried out in the shortest possible time.This article discusses some aspects of the recovery of vaccination coverage for different groups: children, adolescents and adults, and patients at risk and in special situations.

3.
An. pediatr. (2003, Ed. impr.) ; 79(4): 208-217, oct. 2013. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-116357

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la vacuna adyuvada MF59 en la gripe pandémica en población infantil. Métodos: Se ha elaborado una revisión sistemática de la literatura médica (2005-2012). Para ello se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en fuentes de datos electrónicas como MedLine o Embase y búsqueda manual en revistas especializadas, utilizando descriptores MeSH y términos de búsqueda libre. Los criterios de inclusión fueron ensayos clínicos que incluyeran a niños vacunados frente a la gripe A/H1N1 con la vacuna adyuvada MF59 y se comparaba frente a otras dosis vacunales con o sin adyuvante MF59, registrando resultados de seguridad e inmunogenicidad. La calidad de los ensayos clínicos se evaluó utilizando los criterios del cuestionario CASPe. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 4 ensayos clínicos de calidad moderada. Los efectos adversos locales y sistémicos fueron de carácter leve o moderado, sin diferencias entre los grupos vacunados. Los porcentajes de seroconversión y seroprotección alcanzados fueron superiores con las vacunas que utilizaron el adyuvante MF59. Los títulos de anticuerpos alcanzados también fueron mayores en las vacunas adyuvadas. Conclusiones: La vacuna pandémica antigripal adyuvada con MF59 presenta un buen perfil de eficacia y seguridad. Los efectos adversos que puede ocasionar son comunes y se presentan de manera similar a los que acontecen al utilizar vacunas no adyuvadas (AU)


Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of MF59-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A/H1N1vaccine in children. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed after searching the MedLine and Embase electronic databases, and manual search in specialties journals, with MeSH terms and free terms. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials with children vaccinated with MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1 vaccine, compared with other vaccines doses with/without MF59-adjuvanted. The immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine was recorded. The quality of the studies included was assessed by CASPe checklist. Results: Four clinical trials with moderate quality were selected. The local and systemic adverse effects were rare and mild, with no differences between groups. Seroconversion and seroprotection levels were higher with MF59-adjuvanted vaccines. Antibody titres were also higher with the adjuvant vaccines. Conclusions: The adjuvant vaccine has a good efficacy and safety profile. The adverse effects that may occur are common and appear similarly in both vaccination groups (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Influenza Vaccines/analysis , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Patient Safety
4.
Vaccine ; 31(46): 5349-58, 2013 Nov 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24055349

ABSTRACT

Pneumococcal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines represent major progress in the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in the paediatric population. We performed a meta-analysis, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, in order to assess the immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants. A literary search was conducted using electronic databases and specialized journals were searched manually. Inclusion criteria were: clinical trials with infants vaccinated with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate, compared to 7-valent vaccine. We recorded the results in terms of the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccines. The quality of the studies included was assessed using the CASP and Jadad checklists. We included nine randomized clinical trials of 258 potentially relevant references in the meta-analysis. The studies included had high-moderate quality. Both vaccines were well tolerated in all groups of infants, and most local reactions and systemic events were of mild or medium intensity and typical of any injected vaccine. All studies included in the meta-analysis showed high immunogenicity for both pneumococcal vaccines in all tested serotypes. An anti-polysaccharide antibody concentration of ≥0.35 µg/mL was achieved in at least 89% of the infants. Our results suggest that the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has a similar safety profile, and is as effective as, the 7-valent vaccine in the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by the seven common serotypes, and could provide expanded protection against the six additional serotypes.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Infant , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 79(4): 208-17, 2013 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490433

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of MF59-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in children. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed after searching the MedLine and Embase electronic databases, and manual search in specialties journals, with MeSH terms and and free terms. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials with children vaccinated with MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1 vaccine, compared with other vaccines doses with/without MF59-adjuvanted. The immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine was recorded. The quality of the studies included was assessed by CASPe checklist. RESULTS: Four clinical trials with moderate quality were selected. The local and systemic adverse effects were rare and mild, with no differences between groups. Seroconversion and seroprotection levels were higher with MF59-adjuvanted vaccines. Antibody titres were also higher with the adjuvant vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The adjuvant vaccine has a good efficacy and safety profile. The adverse effects that may occur are common and appear similarly in both vaccination groups.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pandemics , Polysorbates , Squalene , Child , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...