Attending and Resident Surgeon Perspectives and Prescribing Practices of Pain Medication During the Opioid Epidemic.

OBJECTIVE: Over 67,000 individuals died in the United States due to drug overdose in 2018; the majority of these deaths were secondary to opioid ingestion. Our aim was to determine surgeon perceptions on opioid abuse, the adequacy of perioperative and graduate medical education, and the role surgeons may play. We also aimed to investigate any differences in attending and resident surgeon attitudes. DESIGN: Anonymous online survey assessing surgeons' opioid counseling practices, prescribing patterns, and perceptions on opioid abuse, adequacy of education about opioid abuse, and the role physicians play. SETTING: Two Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited general surgery programs at a university-based tertiary hospital and a community hospital in the Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: Attending and resident physicians within the Departments of Surgery participated anonymously. RESULTS: Attending surgeons were more likely than residents to discuss posoperative opioids with patients (62% vs. 33%; p < 0.05), discuss the potential of opioid abuse (31% vs. 6%; p < 0.05), and check state-specific prescription monitoring programs (15% vs. 0%; p < 0.05). Surgeons and trainees feel that surgeons have contributed to the opioid epidemic (76% attending vs. 88% resident). Overall, attending and resident surgeons disagree that there is adequate formal education (66% vs. 66%) but adequate informal education (48% vs. 61%) on opioid prescribing. However, when attending physicians were broken down into those who have practiced ≤5 years vs. those with >5 years experience, those with ≤5 years experience were more confident in recognizing opioid abuse (61% vs. 34%) and fewer young faculty disagreed that there is adequate formalized education on opioid prescribing (45% vs. 84%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patient education should be improved upon in the preoperative setting and should be treated as an important component of preoperative discussions. Formalized opioid education should also be undertaken in graduate surgical education to help guide appropriate opioid use by resident and attending physicians.

Mid-Year Medical Knowledge Milestones and ABSITE Scores in First-Year Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Surgery milestone ratings in the "Knowledge of Diseases and Conditions" (MK1) sub competency have been shown to correlate with American Board of Surgery In Training Examination (ABSITE) scores, and hypothesized to predict them. To better assess the predictive value of the MK1 milestone and avoid the potential bias caused by previous years' ABSITE scores, we designed a study including only first-year (PGY-1) residents and analyzed the correlation between their mid-year MK1 ratings and their scores in the ABSITE they took approximately a month later. METHODS: De-identified United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores, mid-year MK1 milestone ratings and the subsequent ABSITE standard scores for the five academic years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 were collected and tabulated for 247 PGY-1 preliminary- and categorical-track residents from ten ACGME-accredited surgery residency programs. RESULTS: The mid-year rating of PGY-1 residents' MK1 was predictive of their subsequent first ABSITE score for the entire cohort and for the categorical residents' subset. Notably, controlling for all other independent predictors, each half-point increase in MK1 rating was associated with a 25-point increase in ABSITE score. Preliminary residents performed significantly worse on the ABSITE, and their scores did not correlate significantly with their MK1 ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-year rating of PGY-1 residents' MK1 was predictive of their subsequent first ABSITE score for the entire cohort and for the categorical but not the preliminary residents. This finding suggests that evaluators correctly rated MK1 higher in the categorical residents who did perform better on the subsequent ABSITE.

Racial disparities in breast cancer persist despite early detection: analysis of treatment of stage 1 breast cancer and effect of insurance status on disparities.

PURPOSE: Prior research demonstrates racial disparities in breast cancer treatment. Disparities are commonly attributed to more advanced stage at presentation or aggressive tumor biology. We seek to evaluate if racial disparities persist in the treatment of stage 1 breast cancer patients who by definition are not delayed in presentation. METHODS: We selected stage 1 breast cases in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on race and included White and Black patients. We also performed a subgroup analysis of patients with private insurance for comparison to determine if private insurance diminished the racial disparities noted. We analyzed differences in time to treatments by race. RESULTS: Our analysis included 546,351 patients of which 494,784 (90.6%) were White non-Hispanic and 51,567 (9.4%) were Black non-Hispanic. Black women had significantly longer times to first treatment (35.5 days vs 28.1 days), surgery (36.6 days vs 28.8 days), chemotherapy (88.1 days vs 75.4 days), radiation (131.3 days vs 99.1 days), and endocrine therapy (152.1 days vs 126.5 days) than White women. When patients with private insurance were analyzed the difference in time to surgery decreased by 1.2 days but racial differences remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite selecting for early-stage breast cancer, racial disparities between White and Black women in time to all forms of breast cancer treatment persist. These disparities while likely not oncologically significant do suggest institutional barriers for obtaining care faced by women of color which may not be addressed with improving access to mammography alone.

Outcomes associated with resident involvement in ventral hernia repair: A population based study using the NSQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of resident involvement on patient outcomes following major ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients with major VHR between 2007 and 2010. Patient outcomes were compared based on presence or absence of resident in the operating room. RESULTS: Residents participated in 57% of the 27,773 identified cases. There was no significant difference in return to operating room or 30-day mortality. A higher incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (4.9% vs 3.9%, P = 0.013) and longer operative time (129.2 vs 99.1 min, P < 0.001) were observed with resident involvement in open inpatient cases. We found no evidence of a "July effect" on outcomes. CONCLUSION: Resident involvement in VHR has little impact on morbidity, and patients can be reassured that resident participation in their care is safe.

Work-Related Quality of Life of US General Surgery Residents: Is It Really so Bad?

PURPOSE: The quality of working life of US surgical residents has not been studied, and given the complexity of interaction between work and personal life there is a need to assess this interaction. We utilized a validated Work Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) questionnaire to evaluate the perceived work-related quality of life of general surgery residents, using a large, nationally representative sample in the United States. METHODS: Between January 2016 and March 2016, all US general surgery residents enrolled in an ACGME general surgery training program were invited to participate. The WRQoL scale measures perceived quality of life covering six domains: General Well-Being (GWB), Home-Work Interface (HWI), Job and Career Satisfaction (JCS), Control at Work (CAW), Working Conditions (WCS) and Stress at Work (SAW). RESULTS: After excluding for missing data, the final analysis included 738 residents. The average age was 30 (±3) years, of whom 287 (38.9%) were female, 272 (36.9%) were from a community hospital, and 477 (64.6%) were juniors (postgraduate year ≤ 3). Demographically, the respondents matched expected percentages. When male and female residents were compared, males had statistically better HWI (p<0.001), better GWB (p = 0.03), more CAW (p = 0.0003) and WCS (p = 0.001). Junior residents had a lower JCS (p = 0.002) and CAW (p = 0.04) compared to seniors. There were no differences between university and community residents in any of the domains of WRQoL. Although residents were more stressed than other professions but the overall WRQoL was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of surgical residency and a surgical career may in fact be more "stressful" than other professions, yet may not translate into a worsened Quality of Life. Our findings suggest further study is needed to elucidate why female residents have or experience a lower perceived WRQoL than their male colleagues.