Effects of earplugs and protective headgear on auditory localization ability in the horizontal plane.

The purpose of this study was to determine how well humans localize sound sources in the horizontal plane while wearing protective headgear with and without hearing protection. In a source identification task, a stimulus was presented from 1 of 20 loudspeakers arrayed in a semicircular arc, and participants stated which loudspeaker emitted the sound. Each participant was tested in 8 conditions involving various combinations of wearing a Kevlar army helmet and two types of earplugs. Testing was conducted at each of 2 orientations (frontal and lateral). In the frontal orientation, overall error was slightly greater in all protected conditions than in the bare-head control condition. In the lateral orientation, overall error score in the protected conditions was substantially and significantly greater than in the bare-head control conditions. Most errors in the lateral orientation were accounted for by front-back confusions, indicating that the protective devices disrupted high-frequency spectral cues that are the basis for discriminating front from back sound sources. The results have practical implications for the use of protective headgear and earplugs in industrial or military environments where localization of critical sounds is important.

Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.

Measures of monaural temporal processing and binaural sensitivity were obtained from 12 young (mean age = 26.1 years) and 12 elderly (mean age = 70.9 years) adults with clinically normal hearing (pure-tone thresholds < or = 20 dB HL from 250 to 6000 Hz). Monaural temporal processing was measured by gap detection thresholds. Binaural sensitivity was measured by interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds. Gap and ITD thresholds were obtained at three sound levels (4, 8, or 16 dB above individual threshold). Subjects were also tested on two measures of speech perception, a masking level difference (MLD) task, and a syllable identification/discrimination task that included phonemes varying in voice onset time (VOT). Elderly listeners displayed poorer monaural temporal analysis (higher gap detection thresholds) and poorer binaural processing (higher ITD thresholds) at all sound levels. There were significant interactions between age and sound level, indicating that the age difference was larger at lower stimulus levels. Gap detection performance was found to correlate significantly with performance on the ITD task for young, but not elderly adult listeners. Elderly listeners also performed more poorly than younger listeners on both speech measures; however, there was no significant correlation between psychoacoustic and speech measures of temporal processing. Findings suggest that age-related factors other than peripheral hearing loss contribute to temporal processing deficits of elderly listeners.

Cross-spectral and temporal factors in the precedence effect: discrimination suppression of the lag sound in free-field.

In an anechoic chamber, subjects were required to discriminate a 20 degrees azimuthal change in a lag sound's position in the presence of a lead sound coming from a different direction. Delay between lead and lag sounds was adaptively varied in several conditions to track discrimination suppression thresholds. In experiment 1, lead and lag stimuli were 5-ms, 1-octave, A-weighted noise bursts (65 dB), with lead and lag parametrically set to center frequencies of 0.5, 2.0, or 3.0 kHz. Discrimination suppression thresholds were higher when lead and lag center frequencies coincided (mean: 11.3 ms) than when they did not coincide (mean: 2.9 ms). These results support the "spectral overlap hypothesis" of Blauert and Divenyi [Acustica 66, 267-274 (1988)], but not the "localization strength hypothesis" later proposed by Divenyi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1078-1084 (1992)]. Spectral overlap and localization strength appear to be two relatively independent factors governing discrimination suppression. It is proposed here that localization strength is weighted more when stimuli are presented via headphones and the only cue to lateral position is the interaural temporal difference, while spectral overlap is weighted more for free-field presented stimuli. In experiment 2, lead and lag stimuli were 8-ms, 1.5-kHz A-weighted tone bursts (65 dB), with lead and lag rise times parametrically set to 0, 2, or 4 ms. In this case the amount of discrimination suppression increased as lead rise time became more abrupt or as lag rise time became more gradual. These results support the localization strength hypothesis: The greater the localization strength of the lead stimulus (independently assessed by measuring its minimum audible angle in isolation), the greater suppression it exerted on discriminability of the lag sound's position. It appears that for stimuli presented in the free-field, spectral overlap is the primary factor affecting discrimination suppression, but when overlap is held constant, abruptness of stimulus onsets governs the amount of suppression.

Echo suppression and discrimination suppression aspects of the precedence effect.

The precedence effect is a phenomenon that may occur when a sound from one direction (the lead) is followed within a few milliseconds by the same or a similar sound from another direction (the lag, or the echo). Typically, the lag sound is not heard as a separate event, and changes in the lag sound's direction cannot be discriminated. The hypothesis is proposed in this study that these two aspects of precedence (echo suppression and discrimination suppression) are at least partially independent phenomena. Two experiments were conducted in which pairs of noise bursts were presented to subjects from two loudspeakers in the horizontal plane to simulate a lead sound and a lag sound (the echo). Echo suppression threshold was measured as the minimum echo delay at which subjects reported hearing two sounds rather than one sound; discrimination suppression threshold was measured as the minimum echo delay at which subjects could reliably discriminate between two positions of the echo. In Experiment 1, it was found that echo suppression threshold was the same as discrimination suppression threshold when measured with a single burst pair (average 5.4 msec). However, when measured after presentation of a train of burst pairs (a condition that may produce "buildup of suppression"), discrimination suppression threshold increased to 10.4 msec, while echo suppression threshold increased to 26.4 msec. The greater buildup of echo suppression than of discrimination suppression indicates that the two phenomena are distinct under buildup conditions and may be the reflection of different underlying mechanisms. Experiment 2 investigated the effect of the directional properties of the lead and lag sounds on discrimination suppression and echo suppression. There was no consistent effect of the spatial separation between lead and lag sources on discrimination suppression or echo suppression, nor was there any consistent difference between the two types of thresholds (overall average threshold was 5.9 msec). The negative result in Experiment 2 may have been due to the measurements being obtained only for single-stimulus conditions and not for buildup conditions that may involve more central processing by the auditory system.

Human offset auditory brainstem response: effects of stimulus acoustic ringing and rise-fall time.

Offset auditory brainstem response (ABR) traditionally has been thought to be an artifactual response elicited by stimulus acoustic ringing. Additionally, offset ABR's sensitivity to stimulus rise-fall time has been associated with concurrent changes in acoustic ringing. The present study tested the validity of offset ABR by recording the response in 40 young, normal-hearing adults using tone burst stimuli with varying degrees of acoustic ringing and various rise-fall times. Stimuli were computer-generated 10-ms tone bursts of 500 and 2000 Hz. In Experiment 1, offset ABR was recorded using stimuli with no acoustic ringing, normal ringing, and excessive ringing. Rise-fall time was held constant at 0.5 ms. In Experiment 2, rise-fall time was manipulated in a stimulus with no ringing. In Experiment 3, only rise time was manipulated in a no-ringing stimulus, while fall time was held constant at 0.5 ms. Reliable offset ABRs were recorded for all degrees of acoustic ringing, including the "no-ringing' condition. Offset ABR was sensitive to rise and fall times, and was elicited best with a 500-Hz stimulus. The results indicate that offset ABR is a real response and not an artifact produced by acoustic ringing.

Left-right asymmetry in the buildup of echo suppression in normal-hearing adults.

Echo threshold is that critical delay of a logging signal (the echo) at which the echo is "suppressed"--i.e., at which one rather than two events is perceived. It has recently been shown that echo threshold increases in most subjects when they are exposed to a train of redundant information prior to the test stimulus presentation--that is, there is buildup of echo suppression in the presence of the preceding train [Clifton et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1525-1533 (1994)]. The present investigation measured echo threshold in 25 normal-hearing adult subjects, both for isolated (baseline) test stimuli and for test stimuli preceded by a redundant train of stimuli (buildup conditions). The test stimulus was a 4-microsecond wideband noise burst pair, in which the lead burst was presented from either the left or right side (from near -45 degrees or or near (+)45 degrees in different runs), and the lag burst was presented from the opposite side. Echo delay was varied adaptively, and the subject's task was to indicate on each trial which of two alternative positions (separated by 20 degrees) the lag sources was presented from. Average echo threshold in the baseline condition was 11.2 microseconds (in agreement with previous results) and did not depend on whether the lead burst was on the subject's left or right side. Average echo threshold in the buildup conditions was significantly elevated. Interestingly, there was a significantly greater buildup effect when the lead stimulus came from the subject's right side (average echo threshold: 24.4 microseconds) than when it came from the left side (average: 18.8 microseconds). This result agrees with informal observations made by Clifton and Freyman [Percept. Psychophys. 46, 139-145 (1989)] and suggests that there is more effective suppression of echo information when the lead stimulus originates from the right side (i.e., the side contralateral to the typically dominant hemisphere) that when it originates from the left side. The distribution of the magnitude of buildup effects across subjects (i.e., echo threshold in the presence of the train minus baseline echo threshold) was unimodal and symmetric, both for lag source on left (mean: 14.1 microseconds) and for lag source on right (mean: 6.7 microseconds). These results are discussed in relation to other hearing asymmetries that have been reported.

Stimulus intensity and fundamental frequency effects on duplex perception.

Duplex perception occurs when part of the acoustic signal is used for both a speech and a nonspeech percept. This phenomenon has been interpreted as evidence of a distinct system for speech perception that precedes other specialized systems of general auditory processing (such as auditory grouping, and perception of pitch, loudness, and timbre). This interpretation was investigated by using an intensity-dependent form of duplex perception with the acoustic pair /da/ and /ga/. The "base" portion of the stimulus, common to both, consisted of the first and second formants and the steady-state portion of the third formant (F3). The F3 transition (either a sinusoid or a true formant), which cued the difference between /da/ and /ga/, was varied in intensity and fundamental frequency (F0). For every subject, the level at which each type of F3 transition was barely audible in the context of the base, i.e., duplex perception threshold, was first established. Next, identification functions were obtained by varying the intensity of the F3 transition relative to each subject's duplex perception threshold. Results revealed that duplex perception thresholds decreased as the F0 of the F3 transition increasingly differed from the base. Also, identification functions showed that, as has been previously demonstrated, the F3 transition contributed to the speech percept over a wide range of intensities and fundamental frequencies. However, as F3 transition intensity increased well above duplex perception threshold, /ga/ identification decreased. Also, both /da/ and /ga/ identification progressively decreased as the F0 of the F3 transition increasingly differed from the base. Contrary to previous duplex perception reports, such findings indicate that both intensity and F0 information is available to the specialized speech perception system. Thus, the computations of the speech perception system and its relation to the general auditory processing systems need to be reexamined.

Motivation and methods for manipulating acoustic ringing of earphones.

Transient acoustic stimuli are used for generating auditory evoked responses (AERs). Common transducers do not accurately reproduce transient stimuli, since the transducer diaphragm oscillates at its resonant frequency at the abrupt initiation or termination of a stimulus. These oscillations are called "acoustic ringing." This paper discusses methods for reducing and canceling acoustic ringing, and describes one method, a systems approach, in detail. It also delineates one method for enhancing acoustic ringing. The methods described provide effective techniques for empirical study of the effects of acoustic ringing on AERs or for any application requiring accurate transduction of a transient stimulus.

Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability.

Thresholds for auditory motion detectability were measured in a darkened anechoic chamber while subjects were adapted to horizontally moving sound sources of various velocities. All stimuli were 500-Hz lowpass noises presented at a level of 55 dBA. The threshold measure employed was the minimum audible movement angle (MAMA)--that is, the minimum angle a horizontally moving sound must traverse to be just discriminable from a stationary sound. In an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice procedure, trials occurred every 2-5 sec (Experiment 1) or every 10-12 sec (Experiment 2). Intertrial time was "filled" with exposure to the adaptor--a stimulus that repeatedly traversed the subject's front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.7 m) at a constant velocity (-150 degrees/sec to +150 degrees/sec) during a run. Average MAMAs in the control condition, in which the adaptor was stationary (0 degrees/sec,) were 2.4 degrees (Experiment 1) and 3.0 degrees (Experiment 2). Three out of 4 subjects in each experiment showed significantly elevated MAMAs (by up to 60%), with some adaptors relative to the control condition. However, there were large intersubject differences in the shape of the MAMA versus adaptor velocity functions. This loss of sensitivity to motion that most subjects show after exposure to moving signals is probably one component underlying the auditory motion aftereffect (Grantham, 1989), in which judgments of the direction of moving sounds are biased in the direction opposite to that of a previously presented adaptor.

Fringe effects in modulation masking.

Modulation detection thresholds (20 log ms) for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noise were measured in the presence of a SAM noise masker with a modulation depth (mm) of 1.0 and a modulation frequency of 16 or 64 Hz. The signal and masker carriers were presented continuously, and the signal was modulated during one of the two 500-ms observation intervals. The masker was modulated during both observation intervals and, in some conditions, for a certain amount of time before and after signal modulation. The duration of this "fringe" ranged from 62.5 ms to continuous (masker modulated throughout the thresholds estimate). The first experiment showed that a 500-ms fringe could reduce masked thresholds by 4-6 dB, but only at low signal modulation frequencies (2-8 Hz). In the second and third experiments, it was found that the fringe had to have a duration of 500 ms and a depth of about 0.75 to be maximally effective. A final, supplementary experiment indicated that the fringe effect is not due solely to the fringe that occurs prior to the observation intervals. The results are discussed in terms of both peripheral and central auditory processing.

Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.

Minimum audible movement angles (MAMAs) were measured in the horizontal plane for four normal-hearing adult subjects in a darkened anechoic chamber. On each trial, a single stimulus was presented, and the subject had to say whether it came from a stationary loudspeaker or from a loudspeaker that was moving at a constant angular velocity around him. Thresholds were established by adaptively varying stimulus duration. In experiment 1, MAMAs were measured as a function of center frequency (500-5000 Hz), velocity (10 degrees-180 degrees/s), and direction of motion (left versus right). There was no effect of direction of motion. MAMAs increased with velocity, from an average of 8.8 degrees of arc for a target moving at 10 degrees/s to an average of 20.2 degrees of arc for a target moving at 180 degrees/s. MAMAs were higher for a 3000-Hz tone than for tones of lower or higher frequencies, as has been previously reported [D. R. Perrott and J. Tucker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1522-1527 (1988)]. In experiment 2, minimum audible angles (MAAs) were measured with sequentially presented stationary tone pulses (500-5000 Hz), and were shown to exhibit the same dependence on signal frequency that the MAMAs showed (average MAA at 3000 Hz: 8.4 degrees; average MAA at the other frequencies: 3.4 degrees). In experiment 3, MAMAs and MAAs were measured as a function of stimulus bandwidth (centered at 3000 Hz) and listening azimuth (0 degrees vs 60 degrees). Average MAAs decreased monotonically as stimulus bandwidth increased from 0 Hz to wideband (from 8.4 degrees to 1.2 degrees at 0 degrees azimuth; from 11.3 degrees to 1.5 degrees at 60 degrees azimuth). As in experiment 1, MAMAs increased with stimulus velocity, from values comparable to the MAAs for the slowest-velocity (10 degrees/s) targets to 70 degrees of arc or more in the poorest condition (third-octave band of noise presented at a velocity of 180 degrees/s and an azimuth of 60 degrees). MAMAs obtained in the slower-velocity conditions depended in the same way on stimulus bandwidth and listening azimuth that MAAs depended on these variables. In no case was the MAMA ever smaller than the MAA. It is hypothesized that a minimum integration time is required to achieve optimal performance in a dynamic spatial resolution task. Average estimates of this minimum time based on the current data vary from 336 ms (for targets presented at midline) to 1116 ms (for narrow-band targets presented at 60 degrees azimuth).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Binaural modulation masking.

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.

Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase.

Modulation thresholds were measured for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) broadband noise in the presence of a SAM broadband background noise with a modulation depth (mm) of 0.00, 0.25, or 0.50, where the condition mm = 0.00 corresponds to standard (unmasked) modulation detection. The modulation frequency of the masker was 4, 16, or 64 Hz; the modulation frequency of the signal ranged from 2-512 Hz. The greatest amount of modulation masking (masked threshold minus unmasked threshold) typically occurred when the signal frequency was near the masker frequency. The modulation masking patterns (amount of modulation masking versus signal frequency) for the 4-Hz masker were low pass, whereas the patterns for the 16- and 64-Hz maskers were somewhat bandpass (although not strictly so). In general, the greater the modulation depth of the masker, the greater the amount of modulation masking (although this trend was reversed for the 4-Hz masker at high signal frequencies). These modulation-masking data suggest that there are channels in the auditory system which are tuned for the detection of modulation frequency, much like there are channels (critical bands or auditory filters) tuned for the detection of spectral frequency.

Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Identification of place of articulation in the synthesized syllables /bi/, /di/, and /gi/ was examined in three groups of listeners: (a) normal hearers, (b) subjects with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, and (c) normally hearing subjects listening in noise. Stimuli with an appropriate second formant (F2) transition (moving-F2 stimuli) were compared with stimuli in which F2 was constant (straight-F2 stimuli) to examine the importance of the F2 transition in stop-consonant perception. For straight-F2 stimuli, burst spectrum and F2 frequency were appropriate for the syllable involved. Syllable duration also was a variable, with formant durations of 10, 19, 28, and 44 ms employed. All subjects' identification performance improved as stimulus duration increased. The groups were equivalent in terms of their identification of /di/ and /gi/ syllables, whereas the hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal listeners showed impaired performance for /bi/, particularly for the straight-F2 version. No difference in performance among groups was seen for /di/ and /gi/ stimuli for moving-F2 and straight-F2 versions. Second-formant frequency discrimination measures suggested that subjects' discrimination abilities were not acute enough to take advantage of the formant transition in the /di/ and /gi/ stimuli.

Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field.

A horizontally moving sound was presented to an observer seated in the center of an anechoic chamber. The sound, either a 500-Hz low-pass noise or a 6300-Hz high-pass noise, repeatedly traversed a semicircular arc in the observer's front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.5 m). At 10-sec intervals this adaptor was interrupted, and a 750-msec moving probe (a 500-Hz low-pass noise) was presented from a horizontal arc 1.6 m in front of the observer. During a run, the adaptor was presented at a constant velocity (-200 degrees to +200 degrees/sec), while probes with velocities varying from -10 degrees to +10 degrees/sec were presented in a random order. Observers judged the direction of motion (left or right) of each probe. As in the case of stimuli presented over headphones (Grantham & Wightman, 1979), an auditory motion aftereffect (MAE) occurred: subjects responded "left" to probes more often when the adaptor moved right than when it moved left. When the adaptor and probe were spectrally the same, the MAE was greater than when they were from different spectral regions; the magnitude of this difference depended on adaptor speed and was subject-dependent. It is proposed that there are two components underlying the auditory MAE: (1) a generalized bias to respond that probes move in the direction opposite to that of the adaptor, independent of their spectra; and (2) a loss of sensitivity to the velocity of moving sounds after prolonged exposure to moving sounds having the same spectral content.

Detectability of tonal signals with changing interaural phase differences in noise.

Detectability of binaurally presented 400- and 800-Hz tonal signals was investigated in an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice experiment. A continuous 3150-Hz low-pass noise masker was presented either diotically (No), interaurally uncorrelated (NU), or interaurally phase-reversed (N pi), at an overall level of 70 dB SPL. Signal duration was either 100 or 1000 ms. The interaural phase difference (IAPD) of the signal was either fixed (0 degree-180 degrees) or time-varying (slightly different frequencies were presented to the two ears). The range of interaural phase variations was selected to yield the same varying interaural temporal differences that would be produced if real auditory targets moved through various arcs in the horizontal plane. In no case was a signal with varying IAPD any more (or less) detectable than would be expected from averaging subjects' performance in the corresponding fixed-IAPD conditions through which the variation occurred. However, in detecting these signals, subjects placed relatively more weight on the temporal central portion than on either the onset or offset. It is proposed that this weighting effect is based on two factors: (1) the signal's 20-ms rise-decay time (i.e., the onset and offset receive less binaural weight because of monaural attenuation); and (2) the very low-pass filtering effected by the binaural system, which results in some minimum time required for it to become "fully engaged." Another finding was that signal detectability became gradually worse as the antiphasic moment in a varying-IAPD signal was moved from the temporal midpoint toward the onset. No evidence was found that a signal's onset and offset were weighted differently in a binaural signal detection task.

Temporal effects in simultaneous pure-tone masking in subjects with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Temporal effects in simultaneous pure-tone masking were studied in three subjects with a high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. The masker level was generally 80 dB SPL, and the signal level was varied adaptively to threshold. Masker frequency was always 1.2 times the signal frequency, and three different frequency regions were studied: (1) signal and masker in region of normal hearing; (2) signal in region of normal hearing and masker in region of hearing loss; and (3) signal and masker in region of hearing loss. In the first experiment, the masker was either gated synchronously with the 20-ms signal or was presented continuously. The gated-continuous threshold difference was largest when both the masker and signal were in a region of normal hearing; that difference decreased, though was not eliminated, when either the masker or the signal-plus-masker was in a region of hearing loss. In the second experiment, threshold was measured for the 20-ms signal as a function of its temporal position within a 400-ms masker. Consistent with the first experiment, the biggest change in masking over time generally occurred when the signal and masker were in a region of normal hearing. These data suggest that the mechanisms responsible for temporal effects in normal-hearing subjects (and in regions of normal hearing in subjects with a hearing loss) are adversely affected by (even a mild) sensorineural hearing loss. Moreover, these data suggest that what may be most important for a normal temporal effect is the integrity of the frequency region where the masker is presented.

Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.

Three experiments investigated subjects' ability to detect and discriminate the simulated horizontal motion of auditory targets in an anechoic environment. "Moving" stimuli were produced by dynamic application of stereophonic balancing algorithms to a two-loudspeaker system with a 30 degree separation. All stimuli were 500-Hz tones. In experiment 1, subjects had to discriminate a left-to-right moving stimulus from a stationary stimulus pulsed for the same duration (300 or 600 ms). For both durations, minimum audible "movement" angles ("MAMA's") were on the order of 5 degrees for stimuli presented at 0 degrees azimuth (straight ahead), and increased to greater than 30 degrees for stimuli presented at +/- 90 degrees azimuth. Experiment 2 further investigated MAMA's at 0 degrees azimuth, employing two different procedures to track threshold: holding stimulus duration constant (at 100-600 ms) while varying velocity; or holding the velocity constant (at 22 degrees-360 degrees/s) while varying duration. Results from the two procedures agreed with each other and with the MAMA's determined by Perrott and Musicant for actually moving sound sources [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 1463-1466 (1977b)]: As stimulus duration decreased below 100-150 ms, the MAMA's increased sharply from 5 degrees-20 degrees or more, indicating that there is some minimum integration time required for subjects to perform optimally in an auditory spatial resolution task. Experiment 3 determined differential "velocity" thresholds employing simulated reference velocities of 0 degrees-150 degrees/s and stimulus durations of 150-600 ms. As with experiments 1 and 2, the data are more easily summarized by considering angular distance than velocity: For a given "extent of movement" of a reference target, about 4 degrees-10 degrees additional extent is required for threshold discrimination between two "moving" targets, more or less independently of stimulus duration or reference velocity. These data suggest that for the range of simulated velocities employed in these experiments, subjects respond to spatial changes--not velocity per se--when presented with a "motion" detection or discrimination task.

Discrimination of dynamic interaural intensity differences.

An experiment was conducted to measure observers' ability to detect time-varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs). In a two-interval forced-choice task, observers discriminated a binaural amplitude modulated (AM) noise in which the modulating sinusoid was interaurally in-phase from the same AM noise in which the modulator was interaurally phase-reversed. The latter stimulus produces a sinusoidally varying IID whose rate and peak IID depend on the frequency (fm) and depth (m) of modulation. The carrier was a narrow-band noise, interaurally uncorrelated, centered at 500, 1000, or 4000 Hz. Presentation level was 75 dB SPL; duration was 1.0 s. For a given fm, m was varied in an adaptive procedure to estimate the depth required for 71% discriminability (mthr). Three of the four observers displayed "low-pass" modulation functions: at 500 Hz, as fm increased from 0-50 Hz, mthr increased from 0.08 (IID = 1.3 dB) to 0.50 (peak IID = 9.5 dB). At 1000 and 4000 Hz observers were more sensitive to IID and the functions (mthr vs fm) were flatter than at 500 Hz. Comparison of these data to previously published data indicates that the binaural system can follow fluctuations in IID more efficiently than it can follow fluctuations in interaural time difference, although there are large individual differences in subjects' capacity to process these two types of binaural cues.