ABSTRACT
Purpose: It is unclear whether computed tomography (CT) scans alter the surgical plan when ordered before surgery for fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a preoperative CT scan alters the planned approach (PA) or planned fixation strategy (PFS) for open reduction internal fixation of intra-articular DRFs. Methods: Radiology records were retrospectively reviewed by one trauma surgeon and two hand surgeons for 33 intra-articular DRFs that met the inclusion criteria and previously underwent open reduction internal fixation. Surgeons were initially provided only preoperative radiographs; they were asked for their PA and PFS. Three months later, each surgeon was provided with the same preoperative radiographs as well as a CT scan. They were asked for their PA and PFS and to grade the usefulness of CT for each fracture. Results: The overall probability of having the same PA and PFS between the two presentations was 70.6% and 70.9%, respectively. There was a significant difference in opinion on the usefulness of the CT scan among the surgeons (P < .001). Conclusions: This study suggests that ordering a CT scan for preoperative planning of open reduction internal fixation for an intra-articular DRF does not affect the approach or fixation strategy in the majority of cases, regardless of how useful a CT scan was determined to be by the surgeon. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
ABSTRACT
Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity injury. Patients referred to safety-net tertiary facilities following a fracture experience significant delays in treatment because of financial and language barriers as well as poor access to care at outlying community hospitals. This delay in treatment can affect postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates because of failure to restore anatomic alignment. The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess for risk factors associated with delayed fixation of distal radius fractures and evaluate the impact of delayed treatment on radiographic alignment. Patients with a distal radius fracture treated surgically during a 2-year period were identified. Measures included time from injury to surgery, demographic information, fracture classification, and radiographic parameters. The effect of surgery delay on radiographic outcomes was assessed with delayed surgery defined as 11 or more days out from injury. A total of 183 patients met study inclusion criteria. Medicaid and indigent patients were more likely to experience a delay in surgical treatment. Specifically, 70% of these patients were treated in a delayed fashion. Delayed treatment of 11 days or more was associated with worse radial height and inclination on postoperative radiographic imaging. Medicaid and indigent patients are more likely to experience delayed fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures. This delayed surgery negatively affects postoperative radiographic outcomes. These findings suggest a need to improve access to care for Medicaid and indigent patients and to proceed with operative intervention within 10 days for distal radius fractures. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e93-e97.].
