Randomized crossover antiemetic study in cisplatin-treated patients. Comparison between high-dose i.v. metoclopramide and high-dose i.v. dexamethasone.

This prospective, randomized, nonblind study comparing the antiemetic effectiveness of high-dose IV metoclopramide and high-dose IV dexamethasone was performed in 78 advanced cancer patients. Chemotherapeutic treatment consisted in cisplatin at a high-dose (120 mg/m2) (HD-CDDP) and at a low-dose (LD-CDDP), either alone (60 mg/m2) or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents (50 mg/m2). The evaluation of the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy was based on three parameters: prevention of vomiting ("major protection"), number of emetic episodes, and subjective preference. Out of 78 study patients, 67 were evaluable. Overall, metoclopramide proved to be statistically superior to dexamethasone in preventing vomiting (P less than 0.005), in reducing the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.001/0.001), and in subjective preference (P less than 0.01). The results divided between HD-CDDP and LD-CDDP groups were also in favor of metoclopramide for reduction of the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.001/0.001 for the HD-CDDP group and P less than 0.001/0.005 for the LD-CDDP group) and in subjective preference (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.001 for the HD- and LD-CDDP groups, respectively). No statistical differences were noted when LD-CDDP was used in monochemotherapy, whereas when LD-CDDP was used in combination chemotherapy, statistical differences in favor of metoclopramide were noted again for the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.01/0.05) and for subjective preference (P less than 0.01), even though the effectiveness of both antiemetic agents was greatly reduced. The evaluation of previously untreated patients reflected the overall results: for the HD-CDDP group all three parameters demonstrated statistical significance in favor of metoclopramide; for the LD-CDDP group, of all three parameters, prevention of vomiting (major protection) was the only one for which there was no significant difference. Mild sedation was the only side effect of metoclopramide. No extrapyramidal reactions were noted during this trial, but concomitant orphenadrine treatment was given. Dexamethasone was always well tolerated. In conclusion, high-dose IV metoclopramide demonstrated its superiority over high-dose IV dexamethasone in all subsets of our population except the LD-CDDP monochemotherapy group, in which the two antiemetics were found to be equivalent in effect.

Reproductive and hormonal factors and breast cancer in a Northern Italian population.

Between January 1980 and March 1983, data were collected to evaluate risk factors for breast cancer in a case-control study based on 368 women with breast cancer admitted to the General Hospital of Pordenone (a district in North Eastern Italy with a particularly high breast cancer mortality rate), and 373 age-matched controls. Nulliparity or low parity, late age at first birth and later menopause were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The elevated risk associated with nulliparity could be almost completely explained by marital status, thus pointing to a specific protection given by parity, rather than some putative influence of infertility or subfertility in breast cancer cases. Likewise, risk did not vary materially according to history of abortions when marital status was controlled for. Increased risk associated with later age at first birth, on the other hand, was not accounted for by marital status or parity. The population studied, though frequently multiparous, showed late average at first birth: this might, at least partly, explain its high mortality rate from breast cancer. The risk estimate was higher if menarche occurred below age 15; however, there was no evidence of a trend for the relative risk to rise with lower age at menarche. The use of oral contraceptives or other female hormones (such as oestrogen replacement therapy) did not appear to be related to the risk of breast cancer. The role of the major menstrual and reproductive variables considered (age at menarche, parity, age at first birth) was apparently stronger in pre-menopausal women, thus suggesting an influence of these factors (and possibly, their hormonal correlates) on one of the latter stages of the process of carcinogenesis.

[Comparative evaluation of 3 tests for the determination of antistreptolysin titer]. / Valutazione comparativa di tre tests per la determinazione del titolo antistreptolisinico.

We have evaluated three commercial assays for ASLO titer determination Actually a hemolysis inhibition plate micromethod (ASLO Pasteur), an automated method based on kinetic measurement of an haemolytic reaction (TASOMATIC/TASOTEC, Diagnostica Senese), and another automated assays using the nephelometric quantitation of a latex particle agglutination.

Social factors, diet and breast cancer in a northern Italian population.

The relation of breast cancer to social and dietary variables was evaluated in a case-control study of 368 women with breast cancer admitted to the General Hospital of Pordenone (a town in the eastern side of Northern Italy) and 373 age-matched controls. Occupation was related to the risk of breast cancer, housewives and non-manual workers (teachers and other professionals, clerical workers, etc.) showing relative risks of 1.7 and 2.4 respectively when compared to women occupied in agriculture. The role of education was apparently less important, and not statistically significant. The risk was higher in women who were obese, the trend of increasing risk with increasing body mass index being confined to post-menopausal women. When indicators of dietary fat intake were analysed, a significantly increased risk was found with more frequent consumption of milk and dairy products but the risk estimates were only slightly above unity with reference to meat consumption. Women who drank alcoholic beverages showed a relative risk of 2.5 compared to women who had never drunk, when allowance was made for all identified potential confounding factors. The association between alcohol and breast cancer was not explained by the other dietary variables considered, and the risk estimates were higher for women who drank more wine, or more than one type of alcoholic beverage. Thus, the findings of the present study give evidence in favour of the hypothesis that alcohol consumption is related to the risk of breast cancer.