The Business of Employed Plastic Surgery: Creating Your Seat at the Table.

BACKGROUND: While the landscape of medicine changes, hospital employment continues to gain popularity in surgical specialties. The number of plastic surgeons entering an employed relationship has also grown, offering new opportunities and challenges alike. The authors studied the profitability of plastic surgery to the hospital and the necessity of the specialty to hospital administration through financial net revenue, contribution margin, and payer mix, to help plastic surgeons realize and capitalize on their importance and contribution to the hospital system. METHODS: Facility net revenue and contribution margin from Houston Methodist West Hospital were evaluated. Average net revenue and contribution margin for inpatient and outpatient cases for plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, and all combined surgical specialties were studied for the 2018 and 2019 fiscal years. RESULTS: The authors demonstrated net increase per year for both outpatient and inpatient revenue in favor of plastic surgery versus orthopedics and combined surgical specialties. Plastic surgery contributed higher facility net revenue when compared to orthopedics, contributing 20 percent more per outpatient case and 86 percent more per inpatient case. A higher contribution margin for each year was realized for inpatient cases versus orthopedics and combined surgical specialties, increasing by 8 percent and 53 percent and 61 percent and 86 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A surgeon's ability to present objective financial data and develop leadership roles within the hospital system can lead to a favorable outcome for both physician and hospital. An objective dialogue with hospital administration is critical and offers an avenue to negotiate the development of your practice.

Is Our Effort Appropriately Valued? An Analysis of Work Relative Value Units in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The work relative value units system was developed as a quantifier of physician labor, technical skill, and training time required to complete surgical procedures. Thus, more complex surgical procedures that require greater technical skills and are more time consuming should yield a greater compensation. It is known that prosthetic breast reconstruction reimburses more per hour than autologous breast reconstruction. However, there are limited data comparing work relative value units and operative times in breast reconstruction procedures. Therefore, this study aims to compare mean operative times and work relative value units per minute across three different modalities of breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was performed to identify all patients undergoing implant-, pedicle-, and free flap-based reconstruction over a 6-year period. Calculation and comparison of median operative times, work relative value units, and dollars per minute was performed. RESULTS: A total of 3135 patients were included in the analysis: 2249 (71.7 percent) underwent immediate implant-based reconstruction, 745 (23.8 percent) underwent immediate free flap-based breast reconstruction, and 141 (4.5 percent) underwent immediate pedicle flap-based reconstruction. Patients were distributed in unilateral and bilateral cases. Consistently, median operative time was greater for free flap breast reconstruction, followed by pedicle flap- and implant-based reconstruction (p < 0.0001). However, work relative value units per minute and dollars per minute were found to be higher for prosthetic reconstruction in all comparisons (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the authors' analysis, more complex and time-consuming procedures resulted in a lower reimbursement in dollars and work relative value units per minute for the procedure.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Protocol Expedites Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.

Bed availability remains a constant struggle for tertiary care centers resulting in the use of management protocols to streamline patient care and reduce length of stay (LOS). A standardized perioperative management protocol for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UA) was implemented in April 2014 to decrease both CT scan usage and LOS. Patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for UA from April 2012 to May 2013 (PRE group) and April 2014 to May 2015 (POST group) were compared retrospectively. There were no differences in patient demographics or clinical findings between the groups. All patients in the PRE group had a CT scan for the diagnosis of appendicitis, whereas there was a 14 per cent decrease in the POST group (P = 0.002). There was a significant decrease in median LOS between the groups [PRE 1.3 vs POST 0.9 days; (P < 0.001)]. There was no difference in subsequent emergency department visits for complications [3 (4%) vs 4 (4%); P = 1.0] or 30-day readmission rate [1 (1%) vs 5 (5%); P = 0.22] between the groups. A standardized perioperative management protocol for UA patients significantly decreased CT scan utilization and LOS without compromising patient care.

Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes of Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for the Treatment of Upper Extremity Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Therapy.

ABSTARCT: BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphedema following breast cancer therapy remains a major problem. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a surgical treatment for lymphedema that has shown promising results, but limited studies in the United States have investigated outcomes for single-stage VLNT to the axilla. The goal of this prospective, ongoing study was to investigate the clinical, psychosocial, and functional outcomes of patients who underwent VLNT for the treatment of upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer therapy. STUDY DESIGN: VLNT to the axilla were performed on patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer therapy. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals by circumferential measurements, pain/heaviness scales, and the LYMQOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty patients met the study criteria. Preliminary results showed a decrease in arm volumes by 34.57 % at 1 month, 52.03 % at 3 months, 42.34 % at 6 months, 65.23 % at 9 months, and 58.68 % at 12 months. Pain and heaviness consistently decreased over time to 0.38 and 1.67 respectively at 12 months. Overall quality of life scores steadily improved from 5.72 preoperatively to 7.79 at 12 months. There was a significant decrease in the number of infections of the affected arm postoperatively and a decreased need for physiotherapy. Complications occurred in 17 patients and consisted mainly of minor wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: VLNT continues to demonstrate its value as a safe and effective treatment option for lymphedema after breast cancer therapy. Significant reductions in volume are accompanied by a decrease in symptoms and improvement in quality of life.