Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 60(5): 245-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20533760

ABSTRACT

In a reference-controlled double-blind trial in patients with acute pharyngitis the effects of a newly developed lozenge containing 8 mg of benzocaine (p-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, CAS 94-09-7) were compared with those of an identically dosed commercial pastille. 246 patients were randomized to receive either the lozenges (group A, n = 123) or the pastilles (group B, n = 123). Each patient took a total of six doses within 12 h according to the double-dummy principle, with each single dose spaced by 2 h. The primary parameter was the assessment of the responder rate with = 50 % pain relief within 15 min post application. Further parameters included the relative relief of pain in the course of the study and the tolerability of the formulation. After application of the first unit the comparison of groups yielded very similar and statistically not differing results for efficacy in both groups, with responder rates of 25.2 % and 22.0 % in groups A and B, respectively. One adverse drug reaction was observed in group B (burning and tingling feeling on the tongue), which, however, did not lead to discontinuation of study participation. In all other cases tolerability was stated to be "good to very good". The application of the benzocaine lozenges was statistically non-inferior to the use of the pastilles.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Benzocaine/administration & dosage , Benzocaine/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Benzocaine/adverse effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pharyngitis/complications , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Br J Nutr ; 104(8): 1156-64, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20487584

ABSTRACT

In the present study, the immune-modulating efficacy of a polyphenol-rich beverage on symptoms associated with the common cold was evaluated. For this purpose, ninety-eight patients reporting common cold symptoms that began no longer than 24 h before the study intervention were randomly assigned to consume either the test beverage or placebo twice per d for 10 d. The severity of the disease was expressed as the total score of the five cold symptoms 'general feeling of sickness', 'headache and/or joint aches', 'sore throat and/or difficulty swallowing', 'hoarseness and/or cough' and 'stuffy nose/sniffle'. Consequently, the decrease from 10.2 (sd 3.1) points at the beginning to 2.1 (sd 2.7) points by the end of the study in the verum group demonstrated a clear improvement, whereas in the placebo group only a reduction from 10.5 (sd 3.0) to 6.3 (sd 3.8) points could be observed. The mean difference between the groups (primary efficacy criterion) of 3.9 points was highly significant (P < 0.01). At the end of the study there were highly significantly (P < 0.01) more patients in the verum group complaint free than in the placebo group (secondary efficacy criterion). In addition to these self-reported values, several local findings of the physical examination were also significantly improved in the verum group.


Subject(s)
Beverages/analysis , Common Cold/drug therapy , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Phenols/pharmacology , Adult , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Flavonoids/chemistry , Humans , Middle Aged , Phenols/chemistry , Polyphenols , Young Adult
3.
Adv Ther ; 26(9): 858-71, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19756416

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A total of 177 patients with moderate-to-severe hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) were tested over a period of 26 weeks in a two-center, two-armed, randomized, double-blind, comparison study. The aim was to see if a combination of glucosamine sulfate (1500 mg/day) and the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (group A), showed equivalence (noninferiority) or superiority as opposed to glucosamine sulfate alone (group B). METHODS: The primary therapy evaluation was performed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthrosis index (WOMAC) score. At the end of the study, a reduction in the pain score of > or =20% was required (primary target criterion) and the quantitative difference in the WOMAC subscores pain, stiffness, and function were analyzed (secondary target criteria). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: When a minimal pain reduction of > or =20% was chosen, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of responders between the two groups (92.2% group A, 94.3% group B). A higher responder criterion (> or =80% reduction in the WOMAC pain score) was chosen. Therefore, the frequency of responders showed a therapeutic and statistical superiority for the combination product of glucosamine sulfate and the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients who complied with the study protocol (group A 44%, group B 32%; P=0.044). OA symptoms (morning stiffness, pain in hips and knees) were reduced at the end of the study: by 48.5%-55.6% in group A and by 41.7%-55.3% in group B. The reduction was greater in group A than in group B. There was a tendency toward superiority shown in the secondary target criteria and concurrent variables. In the global safety evaluation, both products have been demonstrated to be very safe in long-term treatment over 26 weeks. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial in which glucosamine was given in combination with omega-3 fatty acids to patients with OA.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Docosahexaenoic Acids/therapeutic use , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Docosahexaenoic Acids/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/adverse effects , Female , Glucosamine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
Adv Ther ; 26(7): 719-27, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19649583

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Most episodes of recurrent herpes labialis are self-limited and mild, but can be troublesome when they occur frequently with painful and unsightly lesions. Therefore, there has been much interest in developing agents that can suppress outbreaks in addition to being therapeutically effective. The objective of the present study was to examine the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of 1,5-pentanediol (PD) gel in patients with recurrent episodes of herpes labialis. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, a total of 105 patients with frequent episodes of recurrent herpes were randomized to either PD or placebo. During the 26-week prophylactic phase of the study, the patients applied PD gel or placebo gel twice daily to both lips. Upon recurrence of an episode, a 5-day therapy phase started during which the gel was to be applied eight times daily. After the therapy phase, the patient resumed prophylactic treatment twice daily until the next herpes episode. The main outcome measures were number of herpes episodes during the prophylactic phase of 26 weeks, and successful therapy of occurring herpes episodes with a 5-day treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). During recurrence there was a statistically significant improvement regarding the therapeutic effect of the symptoms "blistering," "swelling," and "pain" in the PD group. The global evaluation of efficacy by the investigators and patients showed a statistically significant superiority for PD as opposed to placebo (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions used in the present study, PD did not show any prophylactic effect against recurrence of herpes episodes. A significantly better therapeutic effect of PD over placebo could be demonstrated on the symptoms "blistering," "swelling," and "pain." PD was very safe as no side effects were observed during the course of the study.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Glycols/therapeutic use , Herpes Labialis/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glycols/administration & dosage , Glycols/adverse effects , Herpes Labialis/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pentanes , Recurrence
5.
Int J Food Sci Nutr ; 57(7-8): 512-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17162329

ABSTRACT

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study was performed to investigate the dose-dependent response of serum cholesterol after consuming an ultra-heat-treated milk containing a soy protein preparation. Eighty hypercholesterolemic subjects were assigned to one of four study groups receiving 12.5 or 25 g soy protein (active treatment) or casein (placebo) daily over a period of 4 weeks. The trial substances were provided as ready-made, ultra-heated milk preparations. Before and after the treatment, serum concentrations of total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were determined. Unexpectedly, at the end of the study, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were significantly increased compared with baseline in all study groups. The magnitude of this increase (17-19%) was similar in all active and placebo study groups. Soy protein supplements previously shown to be effective in reducing serum cholesterol had in this study no such lipid-lowering effect after ultra heat treatment.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol/blood , Food Handling/methods , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Hypercholesterolemia/diet therapy , Soybean Proteins/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Beverages , Caseins/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lipoproteins, HDL/blood , Lipoproteins, LDL/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Phytosterols/metabolism , Glycine max , Treatment Failure
6.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 56(8): 574-81, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17009838

ABSTRACT

In a single-blind, randomized, bi-centric, prospective study, the non-inferiority of a fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root fluid extract (Bronchicum Elixir S, fluid test medication) was evaluated by comparison to a fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root tincture (Bronchcium Tropfen, drops test medication). The patients took either 6 x 5 ml of the fluid test medication (fluid group) or 5 x 1 ml of the drops test medication (drops group) daily. 189 outpatients (121 women, 68 men) suffering from acute, not previously treated bronchitis, lasting for less than 48 h, were randomized and treated with either fluid (94 patients: 66 women, 28 men) or drops (95 patients: 55 women, 40 men) over a time period of 7-9 days. 71 patients were excluded from the per-protocol (PP) collective because of violations regarding examination time points and/or intake of the study medication. The primary outcome criterion was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Score (BSS) at the end of the study compared to baseline. In the fluid group, the BSS decreased from 11.0 +/- 5.0 points at baseline to 2.6 +/- 4.6 (76%) at study end compared to a decrease from 11.0 +/- 4.8 points at baseline to 2.5 +/- 4.2 (77.1%) at study end in the drops group (Intention-to-treat (ITT) -analysis). The decrease of the BSS in both groups was highly significant (p < or = 10(-3)), but there was no difference between the two groups. Differences between the study sites were noticed regarding the baseline BSS, which were twice as high at study site 2 compared to study site 1 (probably due to the different way the patients were recruited). However, a statistically significant intergroup difference was not observed at any time point. At the end of the study, 52.1% of the patients of the fluid group were symptom free and 53.7% of the patients from the drops group were symptom free as compared by the ITT-analysis (secondary outcome criterion). For both parameters, the PP-analysis support the non-inferiority of the fluid compared to the drops. The global therapeutic efficacy of the fluid as well as of the drops was rated as being "very good" or "good" by 80% of the patients and clinical investigators. The tolerability was very good in both groups; neither serious adverse events nor clinically relevant findings in the safety parameters were observed. A total of 10 adverse events occurred, 5 in the fluid group and 5 in the drops group. Five of these adverse events (2 in the fluid group and 3 in the drops group) were considered to be possibly or probably related to the intake of the study medication. Neither serious nor unknown adverse drug reactions were observed. One drop-out occurred during the study, because of ineffectiveness of the study medication. In the global safety assessment, the tolerability of both medications was rated by about 90% of the patients and by clinical investigators as "good" or "very good". The study demonstrated that the fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root extract and the combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root tincture were well tolerated and showed comparable results regarding their efficacy, e.g. decrease of the bronchitis symptoms (primary outcome criterion) and in relief of symptoms (secondary outcome criterion). The results of the study confirm the non-inferiority of the fluid, a combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root extract when compared to the drops, a combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root tincture.


Subject(s)
Bronchitis/drug therapy , Primula/chemistry , Thymus Plant/chemistry , Adult , Drug Combinations , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Primula/adverse effects , Sample Size , Sick Leave , Single-Blind Method , Thymus Plant/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
Adv Ther ; 23(1): 171-8, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644619

ABSTRACT

The goal of this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial in 50 healthy volunteers sensitive to acidic foods was to evaluate whether Ester-C calcium ascorbate causes fewer epigastric adverse effects than are produced by regular ascorbic acid (AA). Volunteers were randomly separated into 2 groups of 25. The study comprised an observation period of 9 days (phase 1 medication for 3 consecutive days, washout phase for 3 consecutive days, phase 2 medication for 3 consecutive days). Participants took 1000 mg vitamin C as Ester-C during phase 1 of the study followed by 1000 mg of vitamin C as AA during phase 2, or vice versa. During the course of the study, 3 examinations for the evaluation of epigastric adverse effects were performed (on days 0, 3, and 9). Participants used a diary to record epigastric adverse effects on a daily basis. In total, 28 (56%) of 50 participants reported 88 epigastric adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity. Of these 88 adverse effects, 33 (37.5%) occurred after intake of Ester-C and 55 (62.5%) were noted after intake of AA. The tolerability of Ester-C was rated "very good" by 72% of participants, whereas AA was rated "very good" by only 54%. This difference is statistically significant (P<.05). Investigators concluded that Ester-C compared with AA caused significantly fewer epigastric adverse effects in participants sensitive to acidic foods and that Ester-C is much better tolerated.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/adverse effects , Ascorbic Acid/adverse effects , Threonine/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Antioxidants/chemistry , Ascorbic Acid/chemistry , Cross-Over Studies , Dehydroascorbic Acid/adverse effects , Dehydroascorbic Acid/chemistry , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Threonine/chemistry
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 107(2 Pt 1): 247-55, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16449108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of the fixed combination of black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) and St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) extracts in women with climacteric complaints with a pronounced psychological component. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized placebo-control study, 301 women experiencing climacteric complaints with psychological symptoms were treated with ethanolic St. John's wort extract and isopropanolic black cohosh extract or a matched placebo for 16 weeks. Climacteric complaints were evaluated by means of the Menopause Rating Scale mean score, and psychological complaints were evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale sum score. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation) Menopause Rating Scale score decreased 50% (0.46 +/- 0.13 to 0.23 +/- 0.13) in the treatment group and 19.6% (0.46 +/- 0.14 to 0.37 +/- 0.15) in the placebo group. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score decreased 41.8% in the treatment group (18.9 +/- 2.2 to 11.0 +/- 3.8 points), and 12.7% in the placebo group (18.9 +/- 2.1 to 16.5 +/- 4.3). The treatment was significantly (P < .001) superior to placebo in both measures. There were no relevant group differences regarding adverse events, laboratory values, or tolerability. CONCLUSION: This fixed combination of black cohosh and St. John's wort is superior to placebo in alleviating climacteric complaints, including the related psychological component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.


Subject(s)
Cimicifuga , Climacteric/drug effects , Hypericum , Phytotherapy , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
9.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 55(11): 669-76, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16366041

ABSTRACT

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, prospective study, the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primose root tincture (Bronchicum Tropfen) was investigated at a dosage of 30 drops (1 ml), taken orally five times daily. 150 outpatients (97 women, 53 men) suffering from acute, not previously treated bronchitis, lasting for less than 48 h, were randomized and treated with either verum (75 patients: 45 women, 30 men) or placebo (75 patients: 52 women, 23 men) over a time period of 7-9 days. 17 patients were excluded from the per-protocol (PP) collective because of either withdrawal from the trial (n = 2) or violations regarding examination time points and/or intake of the study medication (n = 15). The primary outcome criterion for efficacy assessment was the decrease of the Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) at the end of the study compared to baseline. In the verum group, the BSS decreased from 12.0 +/- 4.4 points at baseline to 1.0 +/- 2.1 at study end compared to a decrease from 11.7 +/- 4.3 points at baseline to 6.5 +/- 4.8 at study end in the placebo group. The inter-group difference of 5.8 points was highly significant (p < or = 10(-3)) in favour of the verum medication [Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis]. At the end of the study, significantly more patients were symptom free in the verum group (58.7%) than in the placebo group (5.3%) as compared by the ITT analysis (secondary outcome criterion). For both parameters, the PP analysis showed comparable results. The results for the concomitant variables of efficacy support the high superiority of the verum medication compared to placebo. The therapeutic effect was more pronounced the stronger the severity of the acute bronchitis was (as proofed by a stratified evaluation based on severity grade). The tolerability was very good in both groups; neither serious adverse events nor clinically relevant findings in the safety parameters were observed. A total of 7 adverse events occurred, 2 in the verum group and 5 in the placebo group. One of the two adverse events in the verum group was considered to be possibly related to the intake of the study medication. Neither serious nor unknown adverse drug reactions were observed. Two drop-outs occurred during the study related to adverse events, both in the placebo group. In the global safety assessment, the tolerability of both medications was rated as "good" or "very good" by more than 90% of the patients and physicians. In the present study, the fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root tincture was well tolerated and resulted in a clinically relevant and more pronounced decrease of the bronchitis symptoms (primary outcome criterion) and in shortening the duration of acute bronchitis (secondary outcome criterion) when compared to placebo.


Subject(s)
Bronchitis/drug therapy , Phytotherapy , Primula/chemistry , Thymus Plant/chemistry , Acute Disease , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Phytotherapy/adverse effects , Primula/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Thymus Plant/adverse effects
10.
Adv Ther ; 22(2): 175-86, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16020407

ABSTRACT

The lipid-lowering effect of a soy-based protein supplement was evaluated in an 8-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with hypercholesterolemia. A total of 117 patients (63 men and 54 women) received soy protein, either 15 or 25 g/d or placebo. In the active treatment groups low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased significantly by 5.9% and 1.1% respectively, but increased by 3.6% with placebo. Total serum cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels changed significantly in a similar manner. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, homocysteine, folic acid, and vitamin B12 levels did not change significantly compared with baseline in any of the study groups. All preparations were well tolerated. Soy protein 25 g/d was twice as effective as 15 g/d. In conclusion, soy protein supplementation may effectively reduce serum cholesterol levels and therefore is likely to diminish the risk for cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Hypercholesterolemia/diet therapy , Soybean Proteins/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cholesterol/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lipoproteins/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Triglycerides/blood
11.
Eur J Nutr ; 44(2): 65-71, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15309422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Soy protein is effective in lowering plasma cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. It has not been conclusively answered, whether and to what extent other soy constituents may also contribute to this effect. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the change in blood lipid levels after application of two soy-based supplements containing soy protein either without (SuproSoy) or with (Abacor) soy fiber and phospholipids in a randomized placebo-controlled triplearmed study. METHODS: 121 hypercholesterolemic adults (66 females, 55 males) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three treatments. Over 8 weeks they received daily either 25 g soy protein (as a component of the supplements Abacor or SuproSoy) or 25 g milk protein (as a component of placebo). Serum lipids were measured at baseline and after 4, 6 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of supplementation total cholesterol levels were reduced by 8.0 +/- 9.6% (Abacor) and 3.4 +/- 8.3% (SuproSoy); LDL cholesterol levels by 9.7 +/- 11.7% (Abacor) and 5.4 +/- 11.6% (SuproSoy); and Apolipoprotein B levels by 6.9 +/- 14.6% (Abacor) and 4.0 +/- 12.4 % (SuproSoy). Serum levels of HDL cholesterol and triglycerides remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: A preparation combining isolated soy protein with soy fibers and phospholipids showed twice the lipid-lowering effect of a preparation containing isolated soy protein alone. Therefore, such soy-based supplements can be useful in reducing the cardiovascular risk.


Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Cholesterol/blood , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Phospholipids/administration & dosage , Soybean Proteins/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Synergism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phospholipids/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Triglycerides/blood
12.
Adv Ther ; 21(4): 265-75, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15605620

ABSTRACT

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective study, the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral Hypericum extract STW 3-VI (Laif) 900 mg once daily was compared with that of placebo. A total of 140 outpatients (94 women; 46 men) with moderate depressive disorders and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score of 20 to 24 were enrolled in this study. Following a single-blind placebo run-in period of 7 days, the patients were randomized to Hypericum extract 900 mg or placebo for the 6-week treatment period. Nineteen patients have been excluded from the per protocol collective because of violations of protocol regarding the scheduling of study visits and intake of study medication. The primary endpoint for treatment efficacy was the change in total HAMD-17 score at the end of the 6-week treatment period. The HAMD-17 total score decreased significantly from baseline by approximately 11.1 +/- 4.5 points (from 22.8 +/- 1.1 to 11.8 +/- 4.4) in the Hypericum group and by approximately 3.4 +/- 3.9 points (from 22.6 +/- 1.2 to 19.2 +/- 3.8) in the placebo group (P < .001). Comparable group differences in favor of Hypericum were revealed by an additional responder analysis, the von Zerssen's Adjective Mood Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions scale, and a global efficacy assessment. Tolerability was very good in both groups; neither serious adverse events nor clinically relevant changes in safety parameters were observed, and only 2 cases demonstrated a possible connection between an adverse event and the study medication. The final safety assessment showed no differences between the Hypericum extract and placebo groups. The study provided evidence that Hypericum extract STW 3-VI in a once-daily dosing regimen may be an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with moderate depressive disorders.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Phytotherapy/methods , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypericum , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Probability , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
13.
Adv Ther ; 21(3): 197-201, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15509136

ABSTRACT

This 12-week drug-monitoring study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Sanhelios Mussel Lyprinol Lipid Complex on 50 adult men and women with inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 34 patients required drug therapy before and during the study. By the end of the study, 21 (62%) patients were able to reduce their dosage and 13 were able to terminate drug therapy. At the end of the treatment period, 38% were regarded symptom free, and the number of patients with severe pain decreased significantly from 60% at baseline to 25% at the completion of the trial. A significant effect was observed for each investigated parameter. The special combination of Lyprinol and omega-3 fatty acids was generally very well tolerated, with only one, nonserious adverse event (mild nausea) reported. This dietary supplement may therefore be considered an effective and well-tolerated component of treatment regimens for inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/administration & dosage , Lipids/administration & dosage , Pyrones/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/drug effects , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
14.
Adv Ther ; 19(3): 141-50, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12201355

ABSTRACT

This 6-month study evaluated a probiotic multivitamin preparation in 42 adult men and women suffering from stress or exhaustion. The preparation was taken daily with breakfast. A psychological-neurologic questionnaire assessed psycho-organic, central vegetative, and somatic discomforts, and a validated list of adjectives was used to indicate the effect of therapy. At the end of the study, an overall 40.7% improvement in stress was noted, representing significant improvements of 17.4% in positive conditions and of 23.3% in negative conditions (both P<.001). In addition, decreases of 29% in the frequency of infections and of 91% in gastrointestinal discomforts, both established indicators of stress, were recorded. The preparation was well tolerated. This probiotic multivitamin is suitable for reducing stress or exhaustion, or both, as well as for improving the immune system, specifically gastrointestinal health.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/drug therapy , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
15.
Adv Ther ; 19(2): 101-7, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12069368

ABSTRACT

In this pilot study, 43 patients with rheumatoid arthritis ingested 1 g of cod liver oil (one capsule) daily for 3 months. Decreases occurred in morning stiffness (52.4%; P<10(-3)), painful (42.7%) and swollen (40%) joints (P= 10(-3) each), and pain intensity (67.5%). Ratings of "good" or "very good" were awarded by 68% of the patients for efficacy and by 95% for tolerability. Eleven patients reported nonsevere adverse effects that in 3 cases may have been related to the study preparation. Cod liver oil can be recommended for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cod Liver Oil/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cod Liver Oil/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Adv Ther ; 19(1): 43-52, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12008860

ABSTRACT

In a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 70 patients (mean age, 49.7 years) suffering from mild to moderate depression received one tablet of either St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) extract (Calmigen) or fluoxetine hydrochloride (Prozac) twice a day for 6 weeks. Efficacy was determined according to the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD), the von Zerssen depression scale (DS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and patients' overall evaluation. Significant decreases (P<.001) of 50% in the Hypericum group and 58% in the fluoxetine group in the HAMD score and of 42% and 52% on the DS spoke to the efficacy of both medications. The Hypericum extract achieved 83% of the efficacy of fluoxetine on the HAMD and 78% on the DS. Assessments by physicians (CGI) and patients indicated considerable improvement with no between-treatment differences. Of the 9 dropouts (13%), 2 in the Hypericum group and 2 in the fluoxetine group were due to adverse reactions. Safety evaluations demonstrated only minor changes. The Hypericum preparation tested in this study is therapeutically equivalent to fluoxetine and is therefore a rational alternative to synthetic antidepressants.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Hypericum , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...