ABSTRACT
We investigated feasibility and safety of the RhinoChill (RC) transnasal cooling system initiated before achieving a protected airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a prehospital setting.In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), transnasal evaporative cooling was initiated during CPR, before a protected airway was established and continued until either the patient was declared dead, standard institutional systemic cooling methods were implemented or cooling supply was empty. Patients were monitored throughout the hypothermia period until either death or hospital discharge. Clinical assessments and relevant adverse events (AEs) were documented over this period of time.In total 21 patients were included. Four were excluded due to user errors or meeting exclusion criteria. Finally, 17 patients (fâ=â6; mean age 65.5 years, CI95%: 57.7-73.4) were analyzed. Device-related AEs, like epistaxis or nose whitening, occurred in 2 patients. They were mild and had no consequence on the patient's outcome. According to the field reports of the emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, no severe technical problems occurred by using the RC device that led to a delay or the impairment of quality of the CPR.Early application of the RC device, during OHCA is feasible, safe, easy to handle, and does not delay or hinder CPR, or establishment of a secure intubation. For efficacy and further safety data additional studies will be needed.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Hypothermia, Induced/instrumentation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Aged , Ambulances , Austria/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Patient Safety , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the survival rate of those patients who received CPR in the city of Vienna. METHODS: A cohort of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and who were treated by the Vienna Ambulance Service between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, were followed up until either death or hospital discharge. The associations of survival and neurological outcome with their potential predictors were analysed using simple logistic regression models. Odds ratios were estimated for each factor. RESULTS: During the observation period, a total of 7030 (206.8/100,000 inhabitants/year) patients without signs of circulation were assessed by teams of the Vienna Ambulance Service, and 1448 adult patients were resuscitated by emergency medical service personnel. A sustained return of spontaneous circulation was reported in 361 (24.9%) of the treated patients, and in all 479 (33.0%) of the patients were taken to the emergency department. A total of 164 (11.3%) of the patients were discharged from the hospital alive, and 126 (8.7%) of the patients showed cerebral performance categories of 1 or 2 at the time of discharge. Younger age, an arrest in a public area, a witnessed arrest and a shockable rhythm were associated with a higher probability of survival to hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remain low. Efforts should be focused on rapidly initiating basic life support, early defibrillation, and high-quality CPR by emergency medical services and state-of-the art post-resuscitation care.
