Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 85(8): 823-7, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199124

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: U.S. astronauts undergo extensive job-related screening and medical examinations prior to selection in order to identify candidates optimally suited for careers in spaceflight. Screening medical standards evolved over many years and after extensive spaceflight experience. These standards assess health-related risks for each astronaut candidate, minimizing the potential for medical impact on future mission success. This document discusses the evolution of the Shuttle-era medical selection standards and the most common reasons for medical dis-qualification of applicants. METHODS: Data for astronaut candidate finalists were compiled from medical records and NASA archives from the period of 1978 to 2004 and were retrospectively reviewed for medically disqualifying conditions. RESULTS: During Shuttle selection cycles, a total of 372 applicants were disqualified due to 425 medical concerns. The most common disqualifying conditions included visual, cardiovascular, psychiatric, and behavioral disorders. During this time period, three major expert panel reviews resulted in refinements and alterations to selection standards for future cycles. DISCUSSION: Shuttle-era screening, testing, and specialist evaluations evolved through periodic expert reviews, evidence-based medicine, and astronaut medical care experience. The Shuttle medical program contributed to the development and implementation of NASA and international standards, longitudinal data collection, improved medical care, and occupational surveillance models. The lessons learned from the Shuttle program serve as the basis for medical selection for the ISS, exploration-class missions, and for those expected to participate in commercial spaceflight.


Subject(s)
Astronauts , Personnel Selection/standards , Adult , Aerospace Medicine , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Space Flight , United States , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
3.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 214(2): 515-23, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21069516

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Melatonin and light treatment are recommended for hastening adaptation to time zone change. We evaluated an afternoon regimen of 3 mg sustained release (SR) melatonin with and without next morning green light treatment for circadian phase advance. Effects of melatonin and light were tested separately and then combined to determine if the total phase change is additive or synergistic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each condition (melatonin, placebo, light, melatonin plus light), 11 subjects spent from Tuesday evening until Friday afternoon in the laboratory. For all four conditions, the following sleep schedule was maintained: night 1, 2345 to 0630 hours, night 2, 1600 to 0530 hours, and night 3, 2345 to 0700 hours. For the light-only condition, light treatment was administered between 0700 and 0800 hours on Thursday. For melatonin-only or placebo conditions, capsules were administered at 1600 hours on Wednesday. For the combined condition, melatonin was administered at 1600 hours on Wednesday with light treatment between 0600 and 0700 hours on Thursday. Circadian phase was assessed by calculating dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) from salivary melatonin, using a mean baseline +2 standard deviations (BL+2 SD) threshold. For all four conditions, pre-treatment and post-treatment DLMO assessments were on Tuesday and Thursday evenings, respectively. RESULTS: Phase advances were: melatonin at 1600 hours, 0.72 h p<0.005, light treatment from 0700 to 0800 hours, 0.31 h, non-significant, and the combined treatment, 1.04 h p<0.0002. CONCLUSION: The phase advance from the combination of afternoon melatonin with next morning light is additive.


Subject(s)
Biological Clocks , Circadian Rhythm , Jet Lag Syndrome/prevention & control , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Phototherapy , Travel , Actigraphy , Adaptation, Physiological , Administration, Oral , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Biological Clocks/drug effects , Biological Clocks/radiation effects , Capsules , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Jet Lag Syndrome/etiology , Jet Lag Syndrome/metabolism , Jet Lag Syndrome/physiopathology , Male , Melatonin/metabolism , Middle Aged , Ontario , Saliva/metabolism , Sleep/drug effects , Sleep/radiation effects , Time Factors
4.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 81(12): 1128-32, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21197858

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In the process of crewmember evaluation and certification for long-duration orbital missions, the International Space Station (ISS) Multilateral Space Medicine Board (MSMB) encounters a surprisingly wide spectrum of clinical problems. Some of these conditions are identified within the ISS Medical Standards as requiring special consideration, or as falling outside the consensus Medical Standards promulgated for the ISS program. METHODS: To assess the suitability for long-duration missions on ISS for individuals with medical problems that fall outside of standards or are otherwise of significant concern, the MSMB has developed a risk matrix approach to assess the risks to the individual, the mission, and the program. The goal of this risk assessment is to provide a more objective, evidence- and risk-based approach for aeromedical disposition. Using a 4 x 4 risk matrix, the probability of an event is plotted against the potential impact. Event probability is derived from a detailed review of clinical and aerospace literature, and based on the best available evidence. The event impact (consequences) is assessed and assigned within the matrix. RESULTS: The result has been a refinement of MSMB case assessment based on evidence-based data incorporated into a risk stratification process. This has encouraged an objective assessment of risk and, in some cases, has resulted in recertification of crewmembers with medical conditions which hitherto would likely have been disqualifying. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes a risk matrix approach developed for MSMB disposition decisions. Such an approach promotes objective, evidence-based decision-making and is broadly applicable within the aerospace medicine community.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine , Risk Management/methods , Space Flight/standards , Certification/standards , Disease Progression , Humans , Hypothyroidism/epidemiology , International Cooperation , Occupational Health , Personnel Selection/standards , Physical Examination/standards , Risk Assessment , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/epidemiology , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/epidemiology
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 208(3): 377-86, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20013115

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Melatonin is recommended for hastening adaptation to phase shift, but there is little information on appropriate formulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of three melatonin formulations for circadian phase advance and delay: (a) 3 mg regular release (RR), (b) 3 mg sustained release (SR), and (c) 3 mg surge-sustained release (SSR; consisting of 1 mg RR and 2 mg SR). Circadian phase was assessed by salivary melatonin dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) or offset (MelOff) using thresholds of (1) 1.0 pg/ml and (2) mean baseline + 2 standard deviations (BL + 2SD). Subjects spent from Tuesday evenings until Thursday in the laboratory. Melatonin (or placebo) was administered at 1600 hours (phase advance) Wednesday, with DLMO assessment on Tuesday and Thursday and at 0600 hours (phase delay) Wednesday, with DLMO assessment Tuesday, Wednesday, and MelOff Thursday morning. Phase advances using the 1.0 pg/ml DLMO were as follows: placebo, 0.73 h; RR, 1.23 h (p < 0.003); SR, 1.44 h (p < 0.0002); SSR, 1.16 h (p < 0.012), with no difference between formulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Similar but smaller phase advances were found with BL + 2SD. Using MelOff, posttreatment phase position for the RR formulation was delayed compared to placebo by 1.12 h (p < 0.012), 1.0 pg/ml, and 0.75 h (p < 0.036), BL+2SD. Phase shifts for the SR and SSR conditions could not be determined due to persistent high melatonin levels during sampling times. Similar phase advances were induced by all formulations, and slow clearance of slow release preparations impeded the determination of phase delays. CONCLUSION: Appropriately timed 0.5 mg melatonin doses may avoid these problems.


Subject(s)
Biological Clocks/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Melatonin/pharmacology , Travel , Adult , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Jet Lag Syndrome/physiopathology , Light , Male , Middle Aged , Saliva/drug effects
6.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 79(6): 629-35, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18581950

ABSTRACT

Future long-duration spaceflights are now being planned to the Moon and Mars as a part of the "Vision for Space Exploration" program initiated by NASA in 2004. This report describes the design reference missions for the International Space Station, Lunar Base, and eventually a Mars Expedition. There is a need to develop more stringent preflight medical screening for crewmembers to minimize risk factors for diseases which cannot be effectively treated in flight. Since funding for space life sciences research and development has been eliminated to fund program development, these missions will be enabled by countermeasures much like those currently in use aboard the International Space Station. Artificial gravity using centrifugation in a rotating spacecraft has been suggested repeatedly as a "universal countermeasure" against deconditioning in microgravity and could be an option if other countermeasures are found to be ineffective. However, the greatest medical unknown in interplanetary flight may be the effects of radiation exposure. In addition, a Mars expedition would lead to a far greater level of isolation and psychological stress than any space mission attempted previously; because of this, psychiatric decompensation remains a risk. Historically, mortality and morbidity related to illness and injury have accounted for more failures and delays in new exploration than have defective transportation systems. The medical care system on a future Mars expedition will need to be autonomous and self-sufficient due to the extremely long separation from definitive medical care. This capability could be expanded by the presence of a physician in the crew and including simple, low-technology surgical capability.


Subject(s)
Ecological Systems, Closed , Life Support Systems , Space Flight , Weightlessness/adverse effects , Aerospace Medicine , Health Facility Planning , Humans , Radiation Protection , Time , United States , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration , Weightlessness Countermeasures
7.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 78(12): 1162-9, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18064923

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The medical community of the International Space Station (ISS) has developed joint medical standards and evaluation requirements for Space Flight Participants ("space tourists") which are used by the ISS medical certification board to determine medical eligibility of individuals other than professional astronauts (cosmonauts) for short-duration space flight to the ISS. These individuals are generally fare-paying passengers without operational responsibilities. MATERIAL AND CONTEXT: By means of this publication, the medical standards and evaluation requirements for the ISS Space Flight Participants are offered to the aerospace medicine and commercial spaceflight communities for reference purposes. It is emphasized that the criteria applied to the ISS spaceflight participant candidates are substantially less stringent than those for professional astronauts and/or crewmembers of visiting and long-duration missions to the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: These medical standards are released by the government space agencies to facilitate the development of robust medical screening and medical risk assessment approaches in the context of the evolving commercial human spaceflight industry.


Subject(s)
Space Flight/standards , Humans , International Cooperation , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination/standards , Risk Assessment , Safety
8.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 78(7): 693-7, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17679567

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Standard aeromedical doctrine dictates that aircrew receiving treatment for depression are grounded during treatment and follow-up observation, generally amounting to at least 1 yr. The Canadian Forces has initiated a program to return selected aircrew being treated for depression to restricted flying duties once stabilized on an approved antidepressant with resolution of depression. The currently approved medications are sertraline (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) and bupropion (noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor). This study was undertaken to determine whether or not citalopram or escitalopram affect psychomotor performance. METHOD: In a double-blind crossover protocol with counter-balanced treatment order, 24 normal volunteer subjects (14 men and 10 women) were assessed for psychomotor performance during placebo, citalopram (40 mg), and escitalopram (20 mg) treatment. Each treatment arm lasted 2 wk, involving a daily morning ingestion of one capsule. There was a 1-wk washout period between medication courses. Subjects completed a drug side-effect questionnaire and were tested on three psychomotor test batteries once per week. RESULTS: Neither citalopram nor escitalopram affected serial reaction time, logical reasoning, serial subtraction, multitask, or MacWorth clock task performance. CONCLUSIONS: While we found some of the expected side effects due to citalopram and escitalopram, there was no impact on psychomotor performance. These findings support the possibility of using citalopram and escitalopram for returning aircrew to restricted flight duties (non-tactical flying) under close observation as a maintenance treatment after full resolution of depression.


Subject(s)
Citalopram/pharmacology , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Adult , Aerospace Medicine , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time/drug effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 75(4): 367-9, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15086129

ABSTRACT

A case of a seizure in an active pilot with multiple sclerosis is presented. A 40-yr-old Canadian Forces pilot experienced a secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure while taxiing a CC-130 (Hercules) transport after landing. His multiple sclerosis had been in remission since 1997 and he had been returned to restricted flying duties. He was assessed and treated, with no further seizures or adverse sequelae. An MRI showed a new demyelinating lesion in the anterior corpus callosum. His seizure was the only clinical manifestation of his MS relapse. The prevalence of seizures in MS patients, possible causal mechanisms, and the disposition of pilots with MS are discussed.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine , Military Personnel , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Seizures/etiology , Adult , Canada , Humans , Male , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...