A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of a Single Intravenous Infusion of Ferric Carboxymaltose vs Single Intravenous Iron Polymaltose or Daily Oral Ferrous Sulphate in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Pregnancy.

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is the most common nutritional deficiency affecting pregnant women worldwide. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a newly available intravenous (IV) iron preparation, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), against IV iron polymaltose (IPM), and standard oral iron (ferrous sulphate) for the treatment of IDA in pregnancy. This is an open-labelled prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis conducted at a primary health care facility with a single tertiary referral centre in Launceston. Tasmania, Australia. A 3-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing a single IV infusion of 1000mg of FCM (n = 83 patients) over 15 minutes against a single IV infusion of 1000mg of IPM (n = 82) over 2 hours against 325mg daily oral ferrous sulphate (n = 81) until delivery, for the treatment of IDA in pregnancy. A total of 246 consecutive pregnant women were recruited between September 2013 and July 2014. The median age was 28 years, with a median and mean gestation of 27 weeks. The median serum ferritin was 9µg/L, with a mean of 13µg/L. The mean haemoglobin (Hb) was 114g/L. The primary outcome was the change in ferritin and Hb levels at 4 weeks after intervention. Secondary outcomes included ferritin and Hb improvements at predelivery, safety, tolerability, quality of life (QoL), cost utility, and fetal outcomes. The mean Hb level differences between the baseline intervention time point and 4 weeks thereafter were significantly higher in the FCM versus the oral group by 4.35g/L (95% CI: 1.64-7.05; P = 0.0006) and in the IPM vs the oral group by 4.08g/L (95% CI: 1.57-6.60; P = 0.0005), but not different between the FCM and IPM groups (0.26g/L; 95% CI: -2.59 to 3.11; P = 0.9740). The mean ferritin level differences were significantly higher at 4 weeks in the FCM vs oral iron group by 166µg/L (95% CI: 138-194; P < 0.0001) and in the IPM vs oral iron group by 145µg/L (95% CI: 109-1180, P < 0.0001), but not between the 2 IV groups (21.5µg/L; 95% CI: -23.9 to 66.9; P = 0.4989). Administration of IV FCM during pregnancy was safe and better tolerated than IV IPM or oral iron. Compliance to oral iron was the lowest amongst treatment groups with one-third of the patients missing doses of daily iron tablets. Significant improvement in overall QoL scores was observed in both IV iron supplement groups by achieving normal ferritin following effective and prompt repletion of iron stores, compared to the oral iron group (P = 0.04, 95% CI: 21.3, 1.8). The overall cost utility of IV FCM and IV IPM appear to be similar to oral iron. There were no differences in the fetal outcomes between the 3 trial arms. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a single IV iron infusion is an effective and safe option for treatment of IDA during pregnancy. FCM was more convenient than other treatments. Rapid parenteral iron repletion can improve iron stores, Hb levels and QoL in pregnant women, with ongoing benefits until delivery. Integration of IV iron for IDA in pregnancy can potentially improve pregnancy outcomes for the mother. Update of guidelines to integrate the use of new IV iron preparations in pregnancy is warranted.

Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus standard care in the management of postoperative anaemia: a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing efforts in perioperative management, postoperative iron deficiency anaemia persists, and few data are available about the management of this condition. In this study, we aimed to determine whether giving postoperative intravenous iron (in the form of ferric carboxymaltose) improved iron stores, haemoglobin concentrations, and outcomes following surgery. METHODS: We did a prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled study of patients at two centres (a general hospital and a private health-care centre) in Tasmania, Australia, undergoing elective surgery with functional iron deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin 70-120 g/L and ferritin ≤100 µg/L or iron saturation ≤20%), measured at day 1 postoperatively. Consecutive routine elective surgical patients who were having major orthopaedic surgery, abdominal, and genitourinary surgery, and other surgeries were recruited. Via computer-generated randomisation, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single dose of intravenous 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose (intervention group) or standard care, consisting of observation (control group). The primary endpoints were changes in haemoglobin concentrations and iron stores at 4 weeks postoperatively, and the number of transfused units of blood required postoperatively until discharge. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry platform (number ACTRN12614001261606). FINDINGS: Between Dec 17, 2014, and May 7, 2015, we recruited 201 eligible patients, assigning 103 to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and 98 to standard care only. Baseline mean haemoglobin was 105·5 g/L (SD 13·8) in the standard care group versus 106·2 g/L (11·9) in the ferric carboxymaltose group, improving at 4 weeks to 121·5 g/L (SD 14·5) in the standard group and 130·1 g/L (11·3) in the ferric carboxymaltose group (mean difference of 7·84 g/L, 95% CI 3·79-11·9; p<0·0001 in favour of the ferric carboxymaltose group). Significant improvements in serum iron (5·36 µmol/L, 95% CI 3·62-7·09; p<0·0001), iron saturation (11·40%, 95% CI 8·33-14·50; p<0·0001), and serum ferritin concentrations (468 µg/L, 95% CI 355-582; p<0·0001) were also noted in the ferric carboxymaltose group at 4 weeks compared with standard care, although no differences were noted in transferrin concentrations (0·06 g/L, 95% CI -0·97 to 1·09; p=0·62). Fewer transfused blood units were given in the ferric carboxymaltose group (to one of 103 patients [<1%]) than in the standard care group (to five of 98 patients [5%]; incidence rate ratio 0·10; 95% CI 0·01-0·85; p=0·035). No adverse events were observed with ferric carboxymaltose treatment. INTERPRETATION: Postoperative intravenous ferric carboxymaltose is a feasible and pragmatic management approach in surgical patients with functional iron deficiency anaemia. Our study suggests that patient blood management guidelines should be updated, incorporating the use of postoperative intravenous iron infusion to optimise patient outcomes. Further trials to assess our approach are warranted. FUNDING: Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia, in affiliation with the University of Tasmania, TAS, Australia.