Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 24(5): 818-826, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101475

ABSTRACT

To evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing heart transplants (HTs) using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) under exception status. Adult patients supported by an IABP who underwent HT between November 18, 2018, and December 31, 2020, as documented in the United Network for Organ Sharing, were included. Patients were stratified according to requests for exception status. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to look for differences in survival between groups. A total of 1284 patients were included; 492 (38.3%) were transplanted with an IABP under exception status. Exception status patients had higher body mass index, were more likely to be Black, and had longer waitlist times. Exception status patients received organs from younger donors, had a shorter ischemic time, and had a higher frequency of sex mismatch. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 93% for the nonexception and 88% for the exception IABP patients (hazard ratio: 1.85 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.86, P = .006]). The most common reason for requesting an exception status was inability to meet blood pressure criteria for extension (37% of patients). The most common reason for an extension request for an exception status was right ventricular dysfunction (24%). IABP patients transplanted under exception status have an increased 1-year mortality rate posttransplant compared with those without exception status.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Heart Transplantation , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Waiting Lists , Humans , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/mortality , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Waiting Lists/mortality , Survival Rate , Follow-Up Studies , Risk Factors , Adult , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart-Assist Devices , Postoperative Complications/mortality
2.
J Card Fail ; 29(4): 473-478, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36195201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiologists performing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk of health problems related to chronic occupational radiation exposure. Unlike during CA and PCI, physician radiation exposure during right heart catheterization (RHC) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' radiation doses during RHC with and without EMB and compare them to those of CA and PCI. METHODS: Procedural head-level physician radiation doses were collected by real-time dosimeters. Radiation-dose metrics (fluoroscopy time, air kerma [AK] and dose area product [DAP]), and physician-level radiation doses were compared among RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. RESULTS: Included in the study were 351 cardiac catheterization procedures. Of these, 36 (10.3%) were RHC, 42 (12%) RHC with EMB, 156 (44.4%) CA, and 117 (33.3%) PCI. RHC with EMB and CA had similar fluoroscopy time. AK and DAP were progressively higher for RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. Head-level physician radiation doses were similar for RHC with EMB vs CA (P = 0.07). When physicians' radiation doses were normalized to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB had the highest doses. CONCLUSION: Physicians' head-level radiation doses during RHC with EMB were similar to those of CA. After normalizing to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB were associated with significantly higher physician radiation doses than CA or PCI. These observations suggest that additional protective measures should be undertaken to decrease physicians' radiation exposure during RHC and, in particular, RHC with EMB.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Physicians , Radiation Exposure , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Biopsy/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects
3.
Am J Transplant ; 21(3): 1255-1262, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32978873

ABSTRACT

Historically, patients with restrictive (RCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) experienced longer wait-times for heart transplant (HT) and increased waitlist mortality. Recently, a new HT allocation system was implemented in the United States. We sought to determine the impact of the new HT system on RCM/HCM patients. Adult patients with RCM/HCM listed for HT between November 2015 and September 2019 were identified from the UNOS database. Patients were stratified into two groups: old system and new system. We identified 872 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 608 and 264 were classified in the old and new system groups, respectively. The time in the waitlist was shorter (25 vs. 54 days, P < .001), with an increased frequency of HT in the new system (74% vs. 68%, P = .024). Patients who were transplanted in the new system had a longer ischemic time, increased use of temporary mechanical circulatory support and mechanical ventilation. There was no difference in posttransplant survival at 9 months (91.1% vs. 88.9%) (p = .4). We conclude that patients with RCM/HCM have benefited from the new HT allocation system, with increased access to HT without affecting short-term posttransplant survival.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic , Heart Transplantation , Transplants , Adult , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/surgery , Databases, Factual , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists
4.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med ; 16(7): 322, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24874028

ABSTRACT

OPINION STATEMENT: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a common and under-diagnosed condition commonly associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration. It is particularly prevalent in the heart failure population affecting up to 40 % of all patients with heart failure. The pathophysiology associated with CSA is based on the underlying effects of hypoventilation and hyperventilation, with neurologic dysregulation of respiratory control as the primary defect. However, therapeutic options are limited because of the prevailing perception that CSA is a consequence, rather than cause of morbidity and mortality. At present, the main focus remains treating the underlying problem (ie, intensifying heart failure therapeutics, decongestion), whereas additional suggestions of using acetazolamide, progesterone, nocturnal oxygen, and theophylline have not been validated with contemporary clinical trials. Positive pressure ventilation is currently the primary recommendation for all patients with sleep-disordered breathing (CSA included), and in some patients may effectively reduce the apnea-hypopnea index. However, significant research is ongoing to determine how to treat this complex patient population.

5.
Case Rep Cardiol ; 2014: 826453, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25587457

ABSTRACT

HeartWare is a third generation left ventricular assist device (LVAD), widely used for the management of advanced heart failure patients. These devices are frequently associated with a significant risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The data for the management of patients with LVAD presenting with GI bleeding is limited. We describe a 56-year-old lady, recipient of a HeartWare device, who experienced recurrent GI bleeding and was successfully managed with subcutaneous (SC) formulations of octreotide.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...