Establishment of a national cervical screening programme in Ireland, CervicalCheck: the first 6 years.

The national cervical screening programme, CervicalCheck, commenced in Ireland in 2008. Free cervical smear tests are offered to over 1.2 million women aged 25-60 every 3 (aged 25-44) and 5 (aged 45-60) years. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the achievements and document the experience of the first 6 years of a new cervical screening programme. Data were extracted from the programme screening register and colposcopy management systems. SAS, version 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. Over 1.98 million smear tests were performed in over 1 million women during the first 6 years of the programme. Overall 5-year coverage at the end of the sixth year was 77.0%, where coverage is presented for the target population of women aged 25-60 years and is adjusted for hysterectomy rates. The numbers of women attending colposcopy increased significantly from 10 000 new patients attending for the first time in the first year to a peak of almost 17 500 in the third year. Increased capacity in colposcopy has delivered significant improvements in waiting times; the percentage of women referred to colposcopy offered an appointment within 8 weeks increased from 41.5% in year 1 to 93.4% in year 4 and has remained above the greater than 90% standard thereafter. The number of biopsies increased markedly, with 33 768 women being diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2 (CIN2), CIN3 or adenocarcinoma in situ and 860 being diagnosed with invasive cancer by the end of the sixth year. Lessons from CervicalCheck include the importance of capacity planning in programme delivery. The programme continues to evolve, particularly with the increased usage of human papillomavirus testing and planning for future testing of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-vaccinated cohort.

Complexity and conundrums. Citizens' evaluations of potentially contentious novel food technologies using a deliberative discourse approach.

This research considers the processes involved in the formation of attitudes by citizens on potentially contentious novel food technologies (NFTs). Observations of one-to-one deliberative discourses between food scientists and citizens, during which they discussed these technologies, form the basis of this enquiry. This approach enables an exploration of how individuals construct meaning around as well as interpret information about the technologies. Thematic analysis identifies key features that provide the frameworks for citizens' evaluations. How individuals make sense of these technologies is shaped by their beliefs, values and personal characteristics; their perceptions of power and control over the development and sale of NFT related products; and, the extent to which these products are relevant to their personal lives. Internal negotiations between these influences are evident, and evaluations are based on the relative importance of each influence to the individual. Internal conflicts and tensions are associated with citizens' evolving evaluative processes, which may in turn present as attitude ambivalence and instability. Many challenges are linked with engaging with the general public about these technologies, as levels of knowledge, understanding and interest vary.