Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genome Med ; 9(1): 84, 2017 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28938910

ABSTRACT

National and international public-private partnerships, consortia, and government initiatives are underway to collect and share genomic, personal, and healthcare data on a massive scale. Ideally, these efforts will contribute to the creation of a medical information commons (MIC), a comprehensive data resource that is widely available for both research and clinical uses. Stakeholder participation is essential in clarifying goals, deepening understanding of areas of complexity, and addressing long-standing policy concerns such as privacy and security and data ownership. This article describes eight core principles proposed by a diverse group of expert stakeholders to guide the formation of a successful, sustainable MIC. These principles promote formation of an ethically sound, inclusive, participant-centric MIC and provide a framework for advancing the policy response to data-sharing opportunities and challenges.


Subject(s)
Information Dissemination , Medical Informatics , Humans , Information Services , Medical Informatics/ethics
2.
Am J Bioeth ; 15(9): 34-42, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26305750

ABSTRACT

Different types of consent are used to obtain human biospecimens for future research. This variation has resulted in confusion regarding what research is permitted, inadvertent constraints on future research, and research proceeding without consent. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center's Department of Bioethics held a workshop to consider the ethical acceptability of addressing these concerns by using broad consent for future research on stored biospecimens. Multiple bioethics scholars, who have written on these issues, discussed the reasons for consent, the range of consent strategies, and gaps in our understanding, and concluded with a proposal for broad initial consent coupled with oversight and, when feasible, ongoing provision of information to donors. This article describes areas of agreement and areas that need more research and dialogue. Given recent proposed changes to the Common Rule, and new guidance regarding storing and sharing data and samples, this is an important and timely topic.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Communication , Informed Consent/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Tissue Donors , Biological Specimen Banks/ethics , Biological Specimen Banks/organization & administration , Biological Specimen Banks/standards , Biological Specimen Banks/trends , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Congresses as Topic , Ethical Analysis , Ethics, Research , Humans , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , United States
3.
PLoS Genet ; 10(11): e1004780, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25375655
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...