A study of the effect of a single neurotoxic dose of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; "ecstasy") on the subsequent long-term behaviour of rats in the plus maze and open field.

RATIONALE: Decreased 5-HT function has been shown to induce behaviour consistent with an "anxiolytic" effect. Administration of a single dose of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; "ecstasy" 12.5 mg/kg IP) to rats results in prolonged damage to central serotonergic nerve terminals. Thus we wished to assess whether an MDMA-induced lesion may have longer-term behavioural consequences. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to examine the behaviour of MDMA-pretreated and control animals in the elevated plus-maze and open field at a number of time-points, up to 80 days, after the administration of a single neurotoxic dose of MDMA (12.5 mg/kg IP). RESULTS: MDMA-pretreated Dark Agouti rats demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in anxiety-related behaviour, compared to saline-pretreated control rats, in both the elevated plus-maze and open field when the rats were tested on day 73 (open field) and day 80 (plus maze) after MDMA administration. CONCLUSIONS: The behavioural consequences of a single neurotoxic dose of MDMA can be demonstrated over 2 months after administration of the compound, thereby indicating that long-term adaptive changes occur within the brain following the neurodegeneration of 5-HT neurones produced by this recreationally used drug.

A comparison between Dark Agouti and Sprague-Dawley rats in their behaviour on the elevated plus-maze, open-field apparatus and activity meters, and their response to diazepam.

RATIONALE: Preliminary unpublished studies in our laboratory suggested that the behaviour of Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Dark Agouti (DA) rats was markedly different on both the elevated plus maze and in the open-field apparatus. We wished to confirm and extend this initial finding. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to examine the behaviour of SD and DA rats in the elevated plus maze, open-field apparatus and automated activity meters. The response of both strains on the elevated plus maze following diazepam (1 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg) administration was subsequently investigated. RESULTS: DA rats showed markedly greater anxiety-like behaviour than SD rats in both the plus maze and open field, with fewer percentage open/total arm entries and percentage time spent on open/total arms in the plus maze and fewer crossings in the open field. Acute handling plus administration of vehicle abolished this difference in anxiety levels, with DA rats showing similar open-arm behaviour to that of SD rats. Both strains demonstrated a clear anxiolytic response to diazepam (1 mg/kg) in terms of percentage time spent on the open arms, but only SD rats had a statistically significant increase in percentage open-arm entries compared with vehicle-injected control animals. CONCLUSIONS: While the high level of anxiety-like behaviour of DA rats versus SD rats could prove useful in future ethological studies on anxiety, the fact that acute handling decreased the anxiety-like behaviour on the elevated plus maze may limit the value of this strain for the study of putative anxiolytic drugs.