Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am ; 38(1): 1-12, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37673697

ABSTRACT

Inequity exists along the continuum of cancer and cancer care delivery in the United States. Marginalized populations have later stage cancer at diagnosis, decreased likelihood of receiving cancer-directed care, and worse outcomes from treatment. These inequities are driven by historical, structural, systemic, interpersonal, and internalized factors that influence cancer across the pathologic and clinical continuum. To ensure equity in cancer care, interventions are needed at the level of policy, care delivery, interpersonal communication, diversity within the clinical workforce, and clinical trial accessibility and design.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Perinatal Care , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy
2.
Cancer J ; 29(6): 297-300, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37963362

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Marginalized populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, have historically faced significant barriers to accessing quality health care because of structural racism and implicit bias. A brief review and analysis of past and historic and current policies demonstrate that structural racism and implicit bias continue to underscore a health system characterized by unequal access and distribution of health care resources. Although advances in cancer care have led to decreased incidence and mortality, not all populations benefit. New policies must explicitly seek to eliminate disparities and drive equity for historically marginalized populations to improve access and outcomes.


Subject(s)
Racism , Systemic Racism , Humans , Healthcare Disparities , Bias, Implicit , Policy
4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(5): 263-269, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302272

ABSTRACT

The past decade has seen considerable innovation in the delivery of care and payment in oncology. Key initiatives have included the development of oncology medical home care delivery standards, the Medicare Oncology Care Model, and multiple commercial payer initiatives. Looking forward, our next challenge is to reflect on lessons learned from these limited-scale demonstration projects and work toward models that are scalable and sustainable and reflect true collaboration between payers and providers sharing common objectives and methods to advance cancer care delivery. To this end, ASCO continues its work on care delivery standards, quality measurement, and alternative payment models. Over the past year, ASCO has received input from physicians, administrators, payers, and employers to update its Patient-Centered Oncology Payment (PCOP) model. PCOP incorporates current work on provider-payer collaboration, the oncology medical home, and the value of clinical pathways and recognizes the need for common quality measurement, performance methodology, and payment structure across multiple sources of payment. The following represents a summary of the entire model. The model includes chapters on PCOP communities, clinical practice transformation, payment methodology, consolidated payments for oncology care, performance methodology, and implementation considerations. In future work, ASCO will continue its support of the PCOP model, including further development of care delivery standards, quality measures, and technology solutions (eg, CancerLinQ).


Subject(s)
Medicare , Neoplasms , Aged , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient-Centered Care , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...