Increasing Use of Video Telehealth Among Veterans Experiencing Homelessness with Substance Use Disorder: Design of A Peer-Led Intervention.

Telehealth offers promising opportunities, but also challenges, for veterans experiencing homelessness - during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Recent research found low utilization of clinical video visits among homeless veterans receiving a VA tablet, and having a substance use disorder (SUD) further reduced visit likelihood. Hence, this study sought to identify unique barriers to telehealth use among veterans experiencing homelessness with a SUD and design an intervention to promote adoption. This qualitative study was guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The study's three phases included veteran interviews (N = 28) to identify barriers and facilitators to video telehealth use and propose intervention candidates, a provider expert panel to obtain feedback on interventions, and a focus group with veterans to complete the intervention. Finally, a prototype was designed using the intervention mapping approach. Veteran interviews revealed that barriers to video telehealth included complex physical and mental health issues, lack of digital literacy, and insufficient technical support. Together, veterans and experts proposed five intervention candidates. In the end, a veteran focus group combined two candidates, peer-led digital training and motivational interviewing. Intervention mapping was used to design a "stepped care" intervention that trains and activates veterans at all skill levels. This study demonstrates how inclusion of expert and veteran views led to development of a novel intervention to support and sustain video telehealth use among veterans experiencing homeless with SUD.

Potential Concussive Event Narratives of Post-9/11 Combat Veterans: Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Study.

INTRODUCTION: Deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects a significant proportion of those who served in Post-9/11 combat operations. The prevalence of head injuries, including those that lead to mTBI, is often reported quantitatively. However, service member (SM) and Veteran firsthand accounts of their potential concussive events (PCEs) and mTBIs can serve as a rich resource for better understanding the nuances and context of these exposures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-9/11 SMs and Veterans with a history of combat deployment were recruited through the Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium's observational study of deployment-related mTBI. During a comprehensive assessment, participants completed the Virginia Commonwealth University retrospective Concussion Diagnostic Interview, a specialized validated interview measure which obtains detailed narratives of deployment-incurred blast and non-blast-related PCEs. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify and code recurring themes within the narratives. RESULTS: Among the sample of 106 SMs and Veterans, deployment-related mTBI was highly prevalent (67.0%). Over half (50.9%) of the participants identified a blast as the cause of their worst PCE, frequently with accompanying themes of self-reported acute neurological symptoms, intense physical blast forces, and tertiary head impact. Exposure to blast at close range, such as driving directly over an improvised explosive device, occurred in 24.7% of all blast-related narratives and in 59.3% of narratives where blast was identified as causing the worst PCE. Themes of potentially preventable head impacts experienced during noncombat circumstances were also frequent, accounting for 35% of all non-blast-related head injuries in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of deployment-related close-range blast exposure, non-blast impact PCEs, and mTBIs among this Post-9/11 combatant sample was substantial, and in many cases potentially preventable. The use of detailed semi-structured interviews may help health care providers and policymakers to better understand the context and circumstances of deployment-related PCEs and mTBIs.

A Systematic Review of Patient Safety Measures in Adult Primary Care.

Safety measure development has focused on inpatient care despite outpatient visits far outnumbering inpatient admissions. Some measures are clearly identified as outpatient safety measures when published, yet outcomes from quality improvement studies also may be useful measures. The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify published articles detailing safety measures applicable to adult primary care. A total of 21 articles were identified, providing specifications for 182 safety measures. Each measure was classified into one of 6 outpatient safety dimensions: medication management, sentinel events, care coordination, procedures and treatment, laboratory testing and monitoring, and facility structures/resources. Compared to the multitude of available inpatient safety measures, the number of existing adult primary care measures is low. The measures identified by this systematic review may yield further insight into the breadth of safety events causing harm in primary care, while also identifying areas of patient safety in primary care that may be understudied.