Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in outpatients with indicators for heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite several new advances in the treatment of end-stage congestive heart failure (CHF) the number of patients moving onto the heart transplant list continues to rise. Recently, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for advanced CHF. Currently, there are no available data on CRT in cardiac transplant candidates. METHODS: To determine the effects of CRT on potential transplant candidates we retrospectively reviewed patients (n = 34) enrolled in resynchronization trials at our center who met accepted criteria for transplantation. Ventricular function, oxygen uptake and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were compared at baseline and after 6 months of active therapy for each patient. RESULTS: CRT reduced QRS duration from 178 +/- 29 to 143 +/- 17 msec (p < 0.0001) and NYHA class from 3.1 +/- 0.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.7 (p < 0.0001). Ejection fraction (EF) increased from 18.4 +/- 5.1 to 25.1 +/- 8.4% (p < 0.0001) and maximum VO(2) increased from 11.9 +/- 1.8 to 15.3 +/- 3 ml/kg/min (p < 0.0001). Only 2 of the initial 34 patients still met the criteria for transplantation at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: CRT improves ventricular function, oxygen uptake and NYHA class in ambulatory patients who have a QRS of >130 msec and might be considered candidates for cardiac transplantation. Transplantation can be prevented or deferred in the majority of patients. Outpatients with chronic CHF and a widened QRS should be evaluated for CRT before being listed for cardiac transplantation.

Acute renal artery thrombosis treated by percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy.

Renal artery thrombosis or embolus is a rare condition that may lead to hypertension and renal failure. Treatment options in the past have had limited success. We present a case which demonstrates the use of percutaneous rheolytic therapy with the Angiojet atherectomy catheter to treat this condition in the acute setting.

Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effects of biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular function, functional status, quality of life and hospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), prior atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and right ventricular (RV) pacing performed for chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of BVP in CHF should theoretically extend to the patient with chronic RV pacing and AF, to our knowledge, no study has determined the effects of BVP on symptoms and ventricular function in these patients. This patient population allows for the evaluation of ventricular resynchronization independent of any BVP-induced changes on the AV interval. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with severe CHF (ejection fraction < or = 0.35, New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III or IV), prior AV junction ablation and RV pacing performed for permanent AF of at least six months' duration were studied. Electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, functional status evaluations and quality of life surveys were completed before and at three to six months after implant. RESULTS: The NYHA functional classification improved 29% (p < 0.001). The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increased 44% (p < 0.001), the LV diastolic diameter decreased 6.5% (p <0.003) and the end-systolic diameter decreased 8.5% (p < 0.01). The number of hospitalizations decreased by 81% (p < 0.001). The scores on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure survey improved by 33% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that BVP improves the LV function and the symptoms of CHF in patients with permanent AF and chronic RV pacing. These benefits are comparable to those described for patients in sinus rhythm suggesting that BVP acts through ventricular resynchronization rather than optimization of the AV delay.