Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(7): 1629-1638, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33586581

ABSTRACT

We evaluate the safety of bendamustine as a bridge to stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and residual disease after salvage therapy. Thirty-four subjects without complete responses (CR) received bendamustine 200 mg/m2/day for 2 days followed 14 days later by SCT. Sixteen subjects in partial remission (PR) with maximal FDG-PET SUVs ≤8 prior to bendamustine received autologous SCT, while 13 with suboptimal responses were allografted. Five subjects did not proceed to transplant. No bendamustine toxicities precluded transplantation and no detrimental effect on engraftment or early treatment-related mortality (TRM) was attributable to bendamustine. At 1 year, 75% of auto-recipients and 31% of allo-recipients were alive with CR. Two subjects in the autologous arm developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (t-MN). In conclusion, a bendamustine bridge to SCT can be administered without early toxicity to patients with suboptimal responses to salvage chemotherapy. However this approach may increase the risk of t-MN. (NCT02059239).Supplemental data for this article is available online at here.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Lymphoma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Humans , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Salvage Therapy , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 54(12): 2027-2038, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31190006

ABSTRACT

High-dose melphalan (MEL200) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM). Bendamustine induces responses in MM resistant to other alkylators. Our prior Phase I trial adding bendamustine to MEL200 transplant conditioning resulted in no additional toxicity. We now report a single-arm, phase II study that evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine 225 mg/m2 with MEL200 conditioning for ASCT in 18 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 17 with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). The primary end point was the complete response (CR/sCR) rate at day+ 100. Sample size was determined according to Simon's two-stage design. At stage 1, sixteen patients entered the study. As there were eight patients with CR/sCR, enrollment increased to 28 patients. Sixteen out of the first 28 evaluable patients achieved CR/sCR, meeting the design criteria. Enrollment was then expanded to a total of 35 patients. 51% achieved a CR/sCR. After a median follow-up of 65 months, 21 patients progressed, including 7 deaths. The median PFS for NDMM and RRMM was 48 and 45 months, respectively. Bendamustine/MEL200 conditioning resulted in excellent overall and depth of response as well as PFS, particularly in the RRMM patients, and is worthy of further investigation (NCT00916058).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Young Adult
5.
Haematologica ; 103(5): 770-777, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29419425

ABSTRACT

Gene therapy for sickle cell disease is limited by the yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells that can be harvested for transduction or gene editing. We therefore performed a phase I dose-escalation study of the hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilizing agent plerixafor to evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard dosing on peripheral blood CD34+ cell mobilization. Of 15 patients enrolled to date, only one was chronically transfused and ten were on hydroxyurea. Of eight patients who achieved a CD34+ cell concentration >30 cells/µL, six were on hydroxyurea. There was no clear dose response to increasing plerixafor dosage. There was a low rate of serious adverse events; two patients developed vaso-occlusive crises, at the doses of 80 µg/kg and 240 µg/kg. Hydroxyurea may have contributed to the limited CD34+ mobilization by affecting baseline peripheral blood CD34 counts, which correlated strongly with peak peripheral blood CD34 counts. Plerixafor administration did not induce significant increases in the fraction of activated neutrophils, monocytes, or platelets. However, increased neutrophils positive for activated ß2 integrin and Mac-1 were associated with serious adverse events. In summary, plerixafor was well tolerated but did not achieve consistent CD34+ cell mobilization in this cohort of patients, most of whom were being actively treated with hydroxyurea and only one was chronically transfused. The study will continue with escalation of the dose of plerixafor and modification of hydroxyurea administration. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02193191.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Hydroxyurea/administration & dosage , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/metabolism , Anemia, Sickle Cell/pathology , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Antisickling Agents/administration & dosage , Benzylamines , Cells, Cultured , Cyclams , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
6.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(2): 359-365, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29128555

ABSTRACT

Limited studies have reported on outcomes for lymphoid malignancy patients receiving alternative donor allogeneic stem cell transplants. We have previously described combining CD34-selected haploidentical grafts with umbilical cord blood (haplo-cord) to accelerate neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Here, we examine the outcome of patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing haplo-cord transplantation at the University of Chicago and Weill Cornell Medical College. We analyzed 42 lymphoma and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) patients who underwent haplo-cord allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Patients underwent transplant for Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 9, 21%), CLL (n = 5, 12%) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (n = 28, 67%), including 13 T cell lymphomas. Twenty-four patients (52%) had 3 or more lines of therapies. Six (14%) and 1 (2%) patients had prior autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplant, respectively. At the time of transplant 12 patients (29%) were in complete remission, 18 had chemotherapy-sensitive disease, and 12 patients had chemotherapy-resistant disease. Seven (17%), 11 (26%), and 24 (57%) patients had low, intermediate, and high disease risk index before transplant. Comorbidity index was evenly distributed among 3 groups, with 13 (31%), 14 (33%), and 15 (36%) patients scoring 0, 1 to 2, and ≥3. Median age for the cohort was 49 years (range, 23 to 71). All patients received fludarabine/melphalan/antithymocyte globulin conditioning regimen and post-transplant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 9 to 60) and to platelet engraftment 19.5 days (range, 11 to 88). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 11.6% at 100 days and 19 % at one year. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 9.3% at 100 days and 19% at one year. With a median follow-up of survivors of 42 months, the 3-year rates of GVHD relapse free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 53%, 62%, and 65%, respectively, for these patients. Only 8% of the survivors had chronic GVHD. In conclusion, haplo-cord transplantation offers a transplant alternative for patients with recurrent or refractory lymphoid malignancies who lack matching donors. Both neutrophil and platelet count recovery is rapid, nonrelapse mortality is limited, excellent disease control can be achieved, and the incidence of chronic GVHD is limited. Thus, haplo-cord achieves high rates of engraftment and encouraging results.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Lymphoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Lymphoma/complications , Lymphoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Premedication/methods , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Haploidentical , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 23(6): 930-937, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285081

ABSTRACT

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) conditioned with high-dose chemotherapy has long been established as the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Despite recent therapeutic advances, high-dose melphalan (HDM) remains the chemotherapy regimen of choice in this setting. Lenalidomide (LEN) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone is recognized as a standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and there is growing support for the administration of LEN as maintenance therapy post-ASCT. In view of the above, the present phase I clinical trial was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose LEN (HDLEN) in patients with RRMM, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of HDLEN when added to HDM before ASCT. Despite administering HDLEN at doses of up to 350 mg/day, the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined, owing to an insufficient number of dose-limiting toxicities in the 21 patients enrolled in the trial. Conditioning with HDLEN plus HDM was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Adverse events following ASCT were as expected with HDM. Median progression-free and overall survival were 10 months and 22 months, respectively, in this population of heavily pretreated patients. Our findings suggest that HDLEN in combination with HDM may offer significant potential as a conditioning regimen before ASCT in patients with RRMM. These preliminary findings are now being evaluated further in an ongoing phase II clinical trial.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Survival Analysis , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, Autologous
8.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 56(11): 3065-70, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25754579

ABSTRACT

Milatuzumab (hLL1), a humanized anti-CD74 monoclonal antibody, has activity in preclinical non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) models. We conducted a phase 1 trial in previously treated B-cell malignancies. Dose escalation included four planned dose levels (1.5, 4, 6 and 8 mg/kg) with milatuzumab given twice weekly for 6 weeks. After dose level 1, the schedule was changed to daily (Monday-Friday) for 10 days. Twenty-two patients were treated. The most common possibly related toxicities were infusion reaction, anemia, lymphopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, neutropenia, rash) at dose levels 1, 2 and 4, respectively. Eight patients had stable disease, with no objective responses. The serum half-life of milatuzumab was ∼2 h. In seven patients, In-111 imaging showed no clear evidence of tumor targeting. The short half-life may reflect CD74 rapid internalization and presence on extratumoral tissues; this antigen sink must be overcome to capitalize on the promising preclinical activity of the drug.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antigens, Differentiation, B-Lymphocyte/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Biomarkers , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/metabolism , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lymphoma, B-Cell/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Recurrence , Retreatment , Tissue Distribution , Treatment Outcome
9.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 56(2): 342-6, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24730538

ABSTRACT

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is effective treatment for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), but response durations are usually limited, especially in aggressive NHL. We hypothesized that administration of bortezomib as a radiosensitizer with RIT would be tolerable and improve efficacy in NHL. This phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated escalating doses of bortezomib combined with 131I-tositumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Twenty-five patients were treated. Treatment was well tolerated, with primarily hematologic toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 0.9 mg/m2 bortezomib, in combination with a standard dose of 75 cGy 131I-tositumomab. Sixteen patients responded (64%), including 44% complete responses (CRs), with 82% CR in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). At a median follow-up of 7 months, median progression-free survival was 7 months, and seven of 11 patients with FL remained in remission at a median of 22 months. In conclusion, bortezomib can be safely administered in combination with 131I-tositumomab with promising response rates.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Radioimmunotherapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Chills/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neutropenia/etiology , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/adverse effects , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Radioimmunotherapy/adverse effects , Remission Induction , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Treatment Outcome
10.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 19(5): 831-7, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23454184

ABSTRACT

Bendamustine has efficacy in multiple myeloma with a toxicity profile limited to myelosuppression. We hypothesized that adding bendamustine to autologous stem cell transplant conditioning in myeloma would enhance response without significant additional toxicity. We conducted a phase 1 trial adding escalating doses of bendamustine to the current standard conditioning of melphalan 200 mg/m(2). Twenty-five subjects were enrolled into 6 cohorts. A maximum tolerated dose was not encountered and the highest dose level cohort of bendamustine 225 mg/m(2) + melphalan 200 mg/m(2) was expanded to further evaluate safety. Overall, there was no transplant related mortality and only one grade 4 dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Median number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 (range, 9 to 14) and 13 (range, 10 to 21), respectively. Disease responses at day +100 posttransplantation were progression in 5 (21%), partial response in 1 (4%), very good partial response in 7 (33%), complete response in 1 (4%), and stringent complete response in 9 (38%). Six patients (24%) with pre-existing high-risk disease died from progressive myeloma during study follow-up, all at or beyond 100 days after autologous stem cell transplant. Bendamustine up to a dose of 225 mg/m(2) added to autologous stem cell transplantation conditioning with high-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma did not exacerbate expected toxicities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Nitrogen Mustard Compounds/therapeutic use , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bendamustine Hydrochloride , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Melphalan/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/surgery , Nitrogen Mustard Compounds/administration & dosage , Transplantation, Autologous
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 16(5): 477-83, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17710442

ABSTRACT

GOALS OF WORK: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of velafermin in patients at risk of developing severe oral mucositis (OM) from chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single-center, open-label, single-dose escalation, phase I trial in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). Velafermin was administered 24 h after stem cell infusion as a single intravenous dose infused over 15 min. Clinical safety variables were assessed and OM status scored daily for 30 days using the World Health Organization (WHO) grading scale. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with velafermin at doses of 0.03 (n = 10), 0.1 (n = 10), 0.2 (n = 8), or 0.33 mg/kg (n = 2). Patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma (n = 16), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 12), acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 1), or desmoplasmic round cell tumor (n = 1). Velafermin was well tolerated at doses up to 0.2 mg/kg. There were no drug-related serious adverse events. No patient discontinued because of adverse events; however, two patients administered 0.33 mg/kg developed adverse reactions immediately after infusion of the study drug. No other patients were treated at this dose level. The most frequent (>35% of patients) treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, pyrexia, vomiting, and nausea. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved the same day without sequelae. Eight (27%) patients developed WHO grade 3 or 4 OM during the study; seven of these patients received high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen. CONCLUSION: Velafermin was well tolerated by autologous PBSCT patients at doses up to 0.2 mg/kg.


Subject(s)
Fibroblast Growth Factors/adverse effects , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...