Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Placenta Accreta , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Operating Rooms , Cesarean Section , Hysterectomy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: While the pressure points technique for proximal hemorrhage control is long known, it is not recommended in standard prehospital guidelines based on a study showing the inability to maintain occlusion for over two minutes. MAIN SYMPTOM: This report details a gunshot wound to the left axillary area with complete transection of the axillary artery, leading to profuse junctional hemorrhage and profound hemorrhagic shock. THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION: Proximal pressure of the subclavian artery was applied against the first rib (the pressure points technique) and maintained for 28 minutes. OUTCOMES: Cessation of apparent bleeding and excellent, enduring physiologic response to blood transfusion were observed. CONCLUSION: The pressure points technique can be life-saving in junctional arterial hemorrhage and should be reconsidered in prehospital guidelines.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Several reports of obstetric anesthesia management have been published since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to collect high-quality broad and detailed data from different university medical centers in several European Society of Anesthesiologist countries. METHODS: This prospective observational survey was performed in eight medical centers in Spain, Israel and Portugal from 1st April to 31st July 2020. Institutional review board approval was received at each participating center. Inclusion criteria: all women with a positive test for COVID-19. Retrieved data included maternal, delivery, anesthetic, postpartum details, and neonatal outcomes. Descriptive data are presented, and outcomes were compared for women with versus without respiratory signs and symptoms. RESULTS: Women with respiratory symptoms (20/12.1%) had significantly higher mean (standard deviation) temperature (37.2 °C (0.8) versus 36.8 °C (0.6)), were older (34.1 (6.7) years versus 30.5 (6.6)) and had higher body mass index kg m-2 - (29.5 (7.5) versus 28.2 (5.1)). Women with respiratory symptoms delivered at a significantly earlier gestational age (50% < 37 weeks) with a 65% cesarean delivery rate (versus 22.1% in the group without respiratory symptoms) and 5-fold increased rate of emergency cesarean delivery, 30% performed under general anesthesia. A higher rate of intrauterine fetal death (3%) was observed than expected from the literature (0.2-0.3%) in developed countries. There was no evidence of viral vertical transmission. CONCLUSION: Well-functioning neuraxial analgesia should be available to manage laboring women with respiratory symptoms, as there is a higher frequency of emergency cesarean delivery. We report a higher rate of undiagnosed parturient and intrauterine fetal death.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics , COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Infant , COVID-19/epidemiology , Peripartum Period , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Fetal Death , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of satisfaction of women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TOR) without anesthesia as well as the comfort of the gynecologists. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study of women undergoing TOR from July 2017 to January 2018. SETTING: This study was conducted in an academic public hospital. PATIENT(S): Women with ≤15 follicles for retrieval were eligible. Women with body mass index > 35, difficult vaginal approach, endometrioma > 5 cm, or pelvic inflammatory disease were excluded. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our primary endpoint was patient satisfaction. Secondary endpoints were women's willingness to recommend or undergo the procedure again without anesthesia, anxiety levels before the procedure, expected level of pain, actual pain levels during the procedure, and gynecologist's level of difficulty or technical compromise. RESULT(S): During the study period, 500 TORs were performed, of which 402 (80%) were screened for study eligibility. Overall, data were analyzed for 50 eligible women who had their first in vitro fertilization cycle (participating in the study) without anesthesia. High rates of satisfaction were reported, and 90% would recommend the procedure without anesthesia to their friends. Physicians graded the difficulty of the procedure as very easy in 35 procedures; in only two procedures was difficulty reported. CONCLUSION(S): TOR without anesthesia is feasible, with a relatively high satisfaction rate from both patients and gynecologists, suggesting that it should be considered in selected women.