Anatomy, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes for the medial arm flap: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The medial arm flap (MAF) has been used as a pedicle flap and free flap to reconstruct various deformities, including those of the head and neck, axilla, elbow, chest, and hand. This study reviews the anatomy of the flap, the technique of flap harvest, its clinical applications, and a systematic review of the current published literature. METHODS: An online systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 30, 2023, was completed. Studies that investigate the anatomy, technique or clinical outcomes of medial arm flaps were included. Clinical data extracted includes patient, defect, flap characteristics, complications, and take-back procedures. Anatomic data extracted includes anatomical variations, and vascular characteristics and patterns. RESULTS: Between 1980 and 2023, 50 papers were published outlining the medial arm flap. Anatomic studies detail the anatomy of 384 medial arms, and outcomes are reported for 283 MAFs (75 free flaps and 208 pedicle flaps). The superior ulnar collateral artery is most commonly cited as the dominant arterial supply to the middle third of the medial arm. The majority of patients required reconstruction post-burn (39.2%), trauma (17.7%), and tumor excision (12.4%). MAFs were mostly used to reconstruct defects of the head and neck (41.7%), the hand and wrist (21.9%), and the elbow (16.3%). Eleven flaps (4.1%) suffered partial flap failure, and two flaps (0.7%) suffered total flap failure. CONCLUSION: This manuscript demonstrates that the MAF is a reliable and underutilized flap option with a well-hidden donor scar and a low complication rate.

Managing cold intolerance after hand injury: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review seeks to understand whether cold intolerance (CI) improves with time and if there is any role for management strategies such as behavioural therapy, surgery, or pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Two independent reviewers used a predefined search strategy to query MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Articles written in English, Studies of interventions (such as pharmacotherapy or behavioural therapy) for cold intolerance in adult patients with a history of hand injury along with prevalence over time were included for review. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included, with twelve prognostic studies of the effect of time on CI, four studies of self management/behavioural therapies, and a single study of surgical treatment of neuromas. No studies of pharmacotherapies were identified for inclusion in the hand injury literature. Most studies (76.4%) were either prevalence or prospective cohort studies; no level I or II evidence studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: Cold intolerance does not resolve over time for the vast majority of patients. Behavioral and self-management studies have low efficacy and studies presented had a high risk of bias. There is a lack of evidence for the use of pharmacotherapy in CI and this could be considered for future studies.

Incidence of the "Adrenaline Rush" and Vasovagal Response with Local Anesthetic Injection.

BACKGROUND: Many patients feel an "adrenaline rush" or a vasovagal reaction when injected with lidocaine and epinephrine during wide awake surgery. The incidence of these reactions is not well documented in the literature. METHODS: In total, 387 patients were prospectively injected with lidocaine and epinephrine for minor procedures without sedation between July 1, 2019 and November 1, 2020. A concentration of epinephrine with 1:100,000 in 2% lidocaine was injected, with most patients getting less than 20 mL of volume. RESULTS: Eight (2.2%) of the patients had adrenaline rush symptoms, which included nervousness, anxiety, tremors, shaky feelings, flushing, diaphoresis, light-headedness, tingling, and "heart racing." Seven patients (1.8%) experienced vasovagal responses, which included nausea, a feeling of being unwell, faint, or lightheaded, or had circumoral pallor. CONCLUSIONS: Patients run a low risk of feeling an adrenaline rush or vasovagal reaction when injected with lidocaine and epinephrine. Routinely advising patients that the adrenaline rush can happen, and that this is not an allergic reaction can be helpful to allay fear of the unknown and to prevent false allergy beliefs. Injecting patients lying down may decrease the incidence of vasovagal reactions by increasing cerebral blood flow with the advantage of gravity.