A novel approach to expedite emergency investigation for suspected cauda equina syndrome referrals from community and primary care services: A service evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Although a rare spinal emergency, cauda equina syndrome (CES) can result in significant physical, emotional, and psychological sequalae. Introducing a CES pathway enhances diagnosis but may increase Radiology and Orthopaedic workload. To address this, one NHS hospital in England introduced a novel CES pathway. Utilising a criteria-led pathway, patients were referred directly from community/primary care, via the Emergency Department, for an emergency MRI scan. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients referred via an original and redesigned Community and Primary Care CES pathway. DESIGN: A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken of all emergency MRI scans investigating suspected CES via either pathway. METHODS: Two 3-month time periods were analysed; pre-(original) and post-implementation of the redesigned pathway; time to surgery was reviewed over two 12-month periods. RESULTS: Increased MRI scan utilisation was seen following the implementation of the redesigned pathway: original n = 50, redesigned n = 128, increasing Radiology workload. However, the redesigned pathway resulted in a reduction in time to MRI from 3h:01m to 1h:02m; reduction in time spent in ED 4h:55m to 3h:24m; reduction in time to surgery 18h:05m to 13h:38m; reduction in out-of-hour scanning from 10 to 2 patients during the evaluation period; and a reduction in on-call Orthopaedic involvement by 38%. CONCLUSION: All timed outcomes were improved with the implementation of this novel pathway. This suggests expediting MRI scans can result in substantial downstream benefits; albeit while increasing MRI scan utilisation. This pathway aligns with the emergency management of suspected CES under the new national CES pathway in England.

A service evaluation of patients suspected of Cauda Equina Syndrome referred to accident and emergency departments from a national telephone triage service.

BACKGROUND: The presentation and management of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) remains contentious in medical literature, however it is widely agreed that CES requires emergency medical attention. Physiotherapists will often refer suspected cases to A&E departments for emergency medical review in order to safeguard patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the management of patients triaged by a national telephone service referred to A&E for suspected CES. METHOD: Known escalations (17 cases) from January 2017 to June 2017 from a national telephone triage service referred to A&E with suspected CES were included. RESULTS: 53% of cases with CES symptoms that conformed to the BASS definition of having a requirement for diagnostic imaging were not investigated by MRI scan. The MRI and non-MRI groups had similar group sizes (8 : 9) and mean ages (42.4 years ± 8SD and 45.7 years ± 12SD). Overall, there were more females (11) compared to males (6) referred to A&E. CONCLUSION: There appears to be significant variability in the management of this cohort of patients once referred to emergency departments. Further guidance is needed as to when watchful waiting is clinically appropriate, and what best practice should be to facilitate safe patient management.

Safety netting; best practice in the face of uncertainty.

Safety netting is a recognised General Practitioner (GP) diagnostic strategy often used in the face of uncertainty to help ensure that a patient with unresolved or worsening symptoms knows when and how to access further advice. It is an important way of reducing clinical risk. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid move to mainly remote consultations within the musculoskeletal field, safety netting is an important strategy to embed within all consultations. Only those presenting with potentially serious conditions are offered face to face consultations. Screening for Red Flags and any indication of a serious cause of symptoms is always first line in any consultation, however, clinical presentations are not always black and white with patients falling into a clear diagnostic category. With patients minds more focussed on COVID-19 symptoms this can be problematic. With the additional ramifications of public health social restrictions, onward management can be a conundrum. Many people with risk factors of serious pathology are also as a consequence, vulnerable to contracting COVID-19. In situations of uncertain clinical presentations, to avoid unnecessary social contact, safety netting can help to monitor symptoms over time until the clinical context becomes more certain. Embedding safety netting within physiotherapy best practice could be a silver lining in this pandemic black cloud.

Assessment and management of cauda equina syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition that affects the nerves in the spine supplying the bladder, bowel and sexual function. Identification and subsequent urgent action is required to avoid permanent damage to these essential organs. Delays in diagnosis can have devastating and life changing consequences for patients and result in high cost negligence claims. PURPOSE: The purpose of this masterclass is to examine the current evidence and provide an evidence-based, clinically reasoned approach in the safe management of patients presenting with CES. It will include a focus on the importance of communication, documentation and a practical approach to safety netting those at risk. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: CES has significant implications for patients and clinicians alike. Timely, effective diagnosis and management of patients with CES results in a better outcome.

Development of a toolkit for early identification of cauda equina syndrome.

Aim To develop a simple cauda equina syndrome (CES) toolkit to facilitate the subjective examination of low back pain patients potentially at risk of CES. To undertake preliminary validation of the content of the toolkit. BACKGROUND: CES is a rare condition which can be very challenging to identify in a generalist medical setting. METHOD: A three phase iterative design with two stake holder groups; extended scope practitioners experienced in managing CES patients and CES sufferers. Toolkit development Synthesis of existing CES literature with CES patient data generated from in depth interviews. Toolkit validation Content validation of the draft toolkit with CES patients. Toolkit validation Content validation of the draft toolkit with extended scope physiotherapists. Findings A three arm toolkit has been developed for use with patients considered by the clinician as at risk of developing CES (eg, worsening low back pain with symptoms/signs of progressive sensory-motor deficit in the lower limbs); patient expertise, clinical expertise, research and pathways. Uniquely, the toolkit drew upon the lived experiences of patients suffering from CES to inform the content.

Developing an early alert system for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC): Red Flag credit cards.

AIM: To produce a user-friendly list of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) Red Flags for non-specialist 'generalist' front-line clinicians working in primary-care settings. BACKGROUND: The issue of identifying MSCC early to prevent serious long-term disability was a key theme identified by the Task and Finish Group at Greater Manchester and Cheshire Cancer Network (GMCCN) in 2009. It was this group who initially brokered and then coordinated the current development as part of their strategic approach to improving care for MSCC patients. METHODS: A consensus-building approach that considered the essential minimum data requirements to raise the index of suspicion suggestive of MSCC was adopted. This followed a model of cross-boundary working to facilitate the mutual sharing of expertise across a variety of relevant clinical specialisms. RESULT: A guideline aimed at helping clinicians to identify the early signs and symptoms of MSCC was produced in the form of a credit card. This credit card includes key statements about MSCC, signposting to key sources of additional information and a user-friendly list of Red Flags which has been developed into an eight-item Red Flag mnemonic. To date, an excess of 120,000 cards have been printed by a variety of organisations and the distribution of the cards is ongoing across the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.

Navigating practice and academic change in collaborative partnership with a community advisory board.

University-based allied health programs must prepare entry-level professionals for a continually-evolving practice landscape. Health care education must demonstrate relevance to community needs in an environment of diminishing resources and increased scrutiny from governmental and accreditation bodies. Diverse perspectives, insights, and strategic counsel are needed to meet these challenges. Strategies associated with the development and functions of corporate and non-profit boards were used to tailor a community advisory board for a dietetics program at a public university. Over a 4-year period, this new board established an annual scholarship conference, funded an endowed scholarship, organized a student mentorship program, and secured new program equipment. The board played a pivotal role in development of and securing administrative approval for the establishment of a Nutrition Center for research, innovative practice, and service learning. In a recent accreditation site visit report, the role of the advisory board was cited as helping to meet education standards. An active advisory board can support strategic program innovation, resource development and help prepare health professionals for 21st century practice. The change-oriented, creative approach described can serve as a model for professional education programs seeking to engage the community in the success of their students.

Anterior knee pain and cold knees: a possible association in women.

Abnormal reactions to environmental cold have been observed in some patients with Anterior Knee Pain (AKP). The aims of this study were to investigate whether palpation of the knee could classify patients into those with and those without cold knees; whether this classification could be objectively validated using thermal imaging; whether the cold and not cold knee groups varied in response to a cold stress test and in patient-reported measures. Fifty eight patients were recruited; palpation classified them into cold and not cold groups. Twenty-one (36%) patients were classified as having a cold knee by palpation: fourteen (36%) females and seven males (37%). Preliminary analysis suggested gender might be an effect modifier and the number of men was small, therefore the analysis focussed on females. Women with cold knees had a significantly smaller patellar skin fold, lower levels of activity and worse scores on the MFIQ, there also appeared to be an association with a traumatic onset. Women with cold knees were more likely to report cold weather affected their knees and they preferred a hot water bottle compared to an ice-pack on their knee; there was also a trend towards having to wear extra tights/long johns in the winter. This study has helped to define a clinical profile for a group of females with AKP and cold knees. This group appears to demonstrate a mild form of Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy.