Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Surgeon ; 20(5): e288-e295, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35144899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection, where appropriate, remains one of the best treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however outcomes can be compromised by the development of liver failure. We reviewed our experience of liver resection for HCC patients to identify factors that may predict the development of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and survival. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study. Data was collected between 1999 and 2017 from all patients undergoing HCC resection in a tertiary university hospital from electronic medical records. PHLF was defined as per the International Study Group for Liver Surgery criteria. Variables with p < 0.15 on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine correlations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and variables with p < 0.15 on univariate analysis selected for a step-down Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 120 patients underwent liver resection within the study period, of which 22 (18%) developed PHLF. Patients with normal INR ≤1.20 at day 2 did not develop PHLF whereas patients with INR >1.60 were at significant risk. Resection of multiple tumours (odds ratio 21.63, p = 0.002) and deranged postoperative day 2 INR>1.6 (odds ratio 21.05, p < 0.0001) were identified as independent prognostic markers of PHLF. CONCLUSION: The use of INR measurement at day 2 predicts PHLF and may enable us to objectively identify and stratify patients who may be eligible for enhanced recovery programs from those who will merit close monitoring in high dependency areas.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Failure , Liver Neoplasms , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Liver Failure/etiology , Liver Failure/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(3): 288-298, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27474844

ABSTRACT

AIM: A large, prospectively collected, clinical database was analysed to determine the various pre- and intra-operative factors affecting anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery. METHOD: Data on 17 518 patients having a colorectal resection with anastomosis, taken from the 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, were included in the study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify risk-adjusted predictive factors for AL. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and confidence intervals were reported at the 95% level. RESULTS: The AL rate was 3.9% (687/17 518). Younger patients, male gender and an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of ≥ 3 (P < 0.001), smoking (P = 0.001), diabetes (P = 0.035), a preoperative serum albumin level of < 4 g/dl (P = 0.030), elective rectal cancer surgery (P = 0.024), emergency colectomy for bleeding (P = 0.013) and splenic flexure mobilization (P = 0.043) were associated with an increased risk of AL. Preoperative oral antibiotics (P < 0.001), right hemicolectomy (open or laparoscopic) and laparoscopic partial colectomy were associated with a reduced risk of AL compared with the entire group. Body mass index, preoperative chemotherapy, emergency surgery and mechanical bowel preparation were not related to AL. CONCLUSION: In contrast to most studies, younger age was found to be an independent risk factor for AL. The risk for AL was lower with laparoscopic partial colectomy and open or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Preoperative oral antibiotic preparation significantly reduces the risk of AL and should be incorporated as a standard protocol.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Colectomy , Colon/surgery , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Databases, Factual , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Laparotomy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Serum Albumin , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 33 Suppl A: 121-9, 1994 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7928829

ABSTRACT

A total of 538 patients from 45 different general practice centres across the UK was admitted to an open study and randomized to one of the following treatment groups: nitrofurantoin modified release (MR) 100 mg bd, trimethoprim 200 mg bd or co-trimoxazole 960 mg bd. Each patient received seven days of medication. Clinical cure, defined as relief from symptoms at visit 2, occurred in 87.2% of the patients treated with nitrofurantoin MR, 84.5% of the co-trimoxazole group and 86.5% of the trimethoprim group. The bacteriological cure rate for nitrofurantoin MR was comparable to co-trimoxazole at 82.3% and 83.2%, respectively, with trimethoprim the lowest at 76.8%. Whilst the cure rate for Escherichia coli infection was similar, 81.5% cured with nitrofurantoin MR, 82.5% with co-trimoxazole and 78.4% by trimethoprim, for non-E. coli pathogens nitrofurantoin MR was equivalent to co-trimoxazole with 86.7% cure but higher than trimethoprim at 72.0%. In-vitro sensitivity to all pathogens isolated at baseline was very high for nitrofurantoin at 96.1%, significantly higher than either co-trimoxazole or trimethoprim at 87.5% (P < 0.01). The test drugs were equally well tolerated with 28 patients (15.7%) reporting adverse events with nitrofurantoin MR, 28 (15.5%) with co-trimoxazole and 28 (15.6%) with trimethoprim. However, nitrofurantoin MR showed fewer patients with drug-related adverse events (5.6%) as judged by the investigator, compared to co-trimoxazole (8.8%) or trimethoprim (7.3%). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Nitrofurantoin/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Delayed-Action Preparations , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Nitrofurantoin/administration & dosage , Nitrofurantoin/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim/adverse effects , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
4.
Pediatr Radiol ; 7(4): 235-7, 1978 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-733401

ABSTRACT

A case of primary neuroblastoma in a seven year old boy is presented in which 99Tcm methylene diphosphonic acid (MDP) used as a bone scanning agent localised in the primary tumour. The possible mechanism for this is discussed.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diphosphonates , Neuroblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Technetium , Child , Humans , Male , Radionuclide Imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...