Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 23(12): 1251-6, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10414911

ABSTRACT

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation results in rapid hematologic recovery when sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells/kg are infused. Recent studies suggest that filgrastim (G-CSF) administration following transplantation leads to more rapid neutrophil recovery and lower total transplant costs. This study compares the use of G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) with sargramostim (GM-CSF) 500 microg/day from day 0 until neutrophil recovery (ANC >1500/mm3) in patients with breast cancer or myeloma who had PBSC mobilized with the combination of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF. Twenty patients (13 breast cancer and seven myeloma) received GM-CSF and 26 patients (14 breast cancer and 12 myeloma) received G-CSF. The patients were comparable for age and stage of disease, and received stem cell grafts that were not significantly different (CD34+ x 10(6)/kg was 12.5 +/- 11.1 (mean +/- s.d.) for GM-CSF and 19.8 +/- 18.5 for G-CSF; P = 0.10). The use of red cells (2.8 vs 2.3 units), and platelet transfusions (2.5 vs 3.1) was similar for the two groups, as was the use of intravenous antibiotics (4.3 vs 4.6 days) and the number of days with temperature >38.3 degrees C (2.3 vs 1.8). Platelet recovery was also similar in both groups (platelets >50,000/mm3 reached after 11.8 vs 14.9 days). The recovery of neutrophils, however, was faster using G-CSF. ANC >500/mm3 and >1000/mm3 were reached in the GM-CSF group at 10.5 +/- 1.5 and 11.0 +/- 1.7 days, respectively, whereas with G-CSF only 8.8 +/- 1.2 and 8.9 +/- 2.2 days were required (P < 0.001). As a result, patients given G-CSF received fewer injections than the GM-CSF patients (10.9 vs 12.3). Resource utilization immediately attributable to the use of growth factors and the duration of pancytopenia, excluding hospitalization, were similar for the two groups. This study suggests that neutrophil recovery occurs more quickly following autologous PBSC transplant using G-CSF in comparison to GM-CSF, but the difference is not extensive enough to result in lower total cost.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/therapy
2.
Contraception ; 21(6): 563-9, 1980 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7428364

ABSTRACT

The use of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) as an injectable contraceptive for women has continued to be controversial for over 10 years. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved it for contraceptive use but the World Health Organization has. We undertook a case-control study to clarify the possible association of breast cancer and DMPA use. Subjects were selected from women enrolled in the Grady Memorial Hospital Family Planning Clinic in Atlanta, Georgia, from 1967 to 1979. The risk of breast cancer in DMPA users compared to nonusers is identical. The small number of women with breast cancer, the short average exposure to DMPA, and the lack of detail about the subjects themselves caused us to interpret our results cautiously. However, it seems reasonable to conclude that short-term use of DMPA among black women is not associated with any increased risk of breast cancer.


PIP: This case-control study attempted to determine the possible association of breast cancer and depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraceptive use. Of 11,400 women who had received the drug, 30 had breast cancer. 29 of these 30 were black women. 70% of cases were aged 30 years or older. Controls were matched for age and parity. Of the women with breast cancer, 16.7% had been exposed to DMPA whereas only 17.9% of controls had been exposed. The risk of breast cancer in DMPA users compared to nonusers was exactly 1. Controlling for parity did not alter this. For all 5 exposed cases, DMPA exposure preceded the diagnosis of the disease by an average of 4 years. The mean number of injections for women with breast cancer and for controls was 2.8 and 3.3, respectively. Hence, though the number of cases was small and the average exposure was short, it is still concluded that short-term use of DMPA among black women is not associated with any increased risk of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Medroxyprogesterone/adverse effects , Adult , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...