Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Genet ; 1032024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258319

ABSTRACT

Dissecting the molecular basis of adaptation remains elusive despite our ability to sequence genomes and transcriptomes. At present, most genomic research on selection focusses on signatures of selective sweeps in patterns of heterozygosity. Other research has studied changes in patterns of gene expression in evolving populations but has not usually identified the genetic changes causing these shifts in expression. Here we attempt to go beyond these approaches by using machine learning tools to explore interactions between the genome, transcriptome, and life-history phenotypes in two groups of 10 experimentally evolved Drosophila populations subjected to selection for opposing life history patterns. Our findings indicate that genomic and transcriptomic data have comparable power for predicting phenotypic characters. Looking at the relationships between the genome and the transcriptome, we find that the expression of individual transcripts is influenced by many sites across the genome that are differentiated between the two types of populations. We find that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), transposable elements, and indels are powerful predictors of gene expression. Collectively, our results suggest that the genomic architecture of adaptation is highly polygenic with extensive pleiotropy.


Subject(s)
Drosophila , Genomics , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Heterozygote , INDEL Mutation
2.
Physiol Biochem Zool ; 96(3): 192-205, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278586

ABSTRACT

Drosophila experimental evolution, with its well-defined selection protocols, has long supplied useful genetic material for the analysis of functional physiology. While there is a long tradition of interpreting the effects of large-effect mutants physiologically, identifying and interpreting gene-to-phenotype relationships has been challenging in the genomic era, with many labs not resolving how physiological traits are affected by multiple genes throughout the genome. Drosophila experimental evolution has demonstrated that multiple phenotypes change because of the evolution of many loci across the genome, creating the scientific challenge of sifting out differentiated but noncausal loci for individual characters. The fused lasso additive model method allows us to infer some of the differentiated loci that have relatively greater causal effects on the differentiation of specific phenotypes. The experimental material that we use in the present study comes from 50 populations that have been selected for different life histories and levels of stress resistance. Differentiation of cardiac robustness, starvation resistance, desiccation resistance, lipid content, glycogen content, water content, and body masses was assayed among 40-50 of these experimentally evolved populations. Through the fused lasso additive model, we combined physiological analyses from eight parameters with whole-body pooled-seq genomic data to identify potentially causally linked genomic regions. We have identified approximately 2,176 significantly differentiated 50-kb genomic windows among our 50 populations, with 142 of those identified genomic regions that are highly likely to have a causal effect connecting specific genome sites to specific physiological characters.


Subject(s)
Drosophila , Starvation , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Phenotype , Machine Learning
3.
Biogerontology ; 20(5): 699-710, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31317291

ABSTRACT

The genomic basis of ageing still remains unknown despite being a topic of study for many years. Here, we present data from 20 experimentally evolved laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster that have undergone two different life-history selection regimes. One set of ten populations demonstrates early ageing whereas the other set of ten populations shows postponed ageing. Additionally, both types of populations consist of five long standing populations and five recently derived populations. Our primary goal was to determine which genes exhibit changes in expression levels by comparing the female transcriptome of the two population sets at two different time points. Using three different sets of increasingly restrictive criteria, we found that 2.1-15.7% (82-629 genes) of the expressed genes are associated with differential ageing between population sets. Conversely, a comparison of recently derived populations to long-standing populations reveals little to no transcriptome differentiation, suggesting that the recent selection regime has had a larger impact on the transcriptome than its more distant evolutionary history. In addition, we found very little evidence for significant enrichment for functional attributes regardless of the set of criteria used. Relative to previous ageing studies, we find little overlap with other lists of aging related genes. The disparity between our results and previously published results is likely due to the high replication used in this study coupled with our use of highly differentiated populations. Our results reinforce the notion that the use of genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic data to uncover the genetic basis of a complex trait like ageing can benefit from experimental designs that use highly replicated, experimentally-evolved populations.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Transcriptome/genetics , Adaptation, Physiological , Animals , Biological Evolution , Drosophila , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Models, Theoretical , Selection, Genetic
4.
BMC Genomics ; 19(1): 743, 2018 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations. RESULTS: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Genomics , Phenotype , Animals , Beauveria/physiology , Desiccation , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Fertility/genetics , Heterozygote , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
5.
Mol Biol Evol ; 35(8): 2085-2095, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860403

ABSTRACT

Model organisms subjected to sustained experimental evolution often show levels of phenotypic differentiation that dramatically exceed the phenotypic differences observed in natural populations. Genome-wide sequencing of pooled populations then offers the opportunity to make inferences about the genes that are the cause of these phenotypic differences. We tested, through computer simulations, the efficacy of a statistical learning technique called the "fused lasso additive model" (FLAM). We focused on the ability of FLAM to distinguish between genes which are differentiated and directly affect a phenotype from differentiated genes which have no effect on the phenotype. FLAM can separate these two classes of genes even with relatively small samples (10 populations, in total). The efficacy of FLAM is improved with increased number of populations, reduced environmental phenotypic variation, and increased within-treatment among-replicate variation. FLAM was applied to SNP variation measured in both twenty-population and thirty-population studies of Drosophila subjected to selection for age-at-reproduction, to illustrate the application of the method.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Genetic Techniques , Models, Genetic , Phenotype , Adaptation, Biological/genetics , Algorithms , Animals , Computer Simulation , Drosophila , Gene Frequency , Genetic Linkage , Genetic Variation , Genome, Insect , Longevity/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sample Size , Selection, Genetic , Selective Breeding
6.
Sci Rep ; 6: 39281, 2016 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28004838

ABSTRACT

Experimental evolutionary genomics now allows biologists to test fundamental theories concerning the genetic basis of adaptation. We have conducted one of the longest laboratory evolution experiments with any sexually-reproducing metazoan, Drosophila melanogaster. We used next-generation resequencing data from this experiment to examine genome-wide patterns of genetic variation over an evolutionary time-scale that approaches 1,000 generations. We also compared measures of variation within and differentiation between our populations to simulations based on a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Our analysis yielded no clear evidence of hard selective sweeps, whereby natural selection acts to increase the frequency of a newly-arising mutation in a population until it becomes fixed. We do find evidence for selection acting on standing genetic variation, as independent replicate populations exhibit similar population-genetic dynamics, without obvious fixation of candidate alleles under selection. A hidden-Markov model test for selection also found widespread evidence for selection. We found more genetic variation genome-wide, and less differentiation between replicate populations genome-wide, than arose in any of our simulated evolutionary scenarios.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological/genetics , Alleles , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Computer Simulation , Domestication , Female , Gene Frequency , Genetic Variation , Genetics, Population , Genome, Insect , Genomics , Heterozygote , Markov Chains , Selection, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...