COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipient and Waitlist Patients: Implications of Chest Radiographic Severity Score.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the chest radiographic severity score (CXR-SS) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who are kidney transplant recipients compared with patients on the waitlist. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort includes 78 kidney transplant recipients (50 men, mean age 59.9±11.9 y) and 59 kidney transplant waitlist patients (33 men, mean age 58.8±10.8 y) diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 15 and May 30, 2020 with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patient chest radiographs were divided into 6 zones and examined for consolidation. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and intubation. Predictors of our primary and secondary outcomes were identified by bivariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in CXR-SS between 2 groups (P=0.087). Transplant recipients had significantly higher rates of hospitalization (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 39.3; P<0.001), ICU admission (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-35.9; P=0.002), intubation (odds ratio, 11; 95% CI: 2.4-96.9; P=0.001), and mortality (odds ratio, 17; 95% CI: 3.9-153.1; P<0.001). A higher CXR-SS was not predictive of mortality, intubation, or ICU admission. CXR-SS was associated with hospital admission overall (odds ratio, 1.613; 95% CI: 1.04-2.49; P=0.0314). CONCLUSION: The CXR-SS was not predictive of mortality, ICU admission or intubation in our population. Kidney transplant patients with COVID-19 had near universal hospital admission, more than one-third mortality and about a quarter were intubated and admitted to the ICU-all significantly worse outcomes than for patients on the transplant waitlist.

Commercial insurance delays direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C kidney transplantation into uninfected recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has created an avenue for transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). The donor transmission of HCV is then countered by DAA administration during the post-operative period. However, initiation of DAA treatment is ultimately dictated by insurance companies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 52 D+/R- kidney recipients who underwent DAA treatment post-transplant was performed. Patients were grouped according to their prescription coverage plans, managed by either commercial or government pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients had government PBMs and 13 had commercial PBMs. Demographics were similar between the two groups. All patients developed HCV viremia, but cleared the virus after treatment with DAA. Patients with government PBMs were treated earlier compared to those with commercial PBMs (11 days vs 26 days, P = .01). Longer time to DAA initiation resulted in higher peak viral loads (ß = 0.39, R2  = .15, P = .01) and longer time to HCV viral load clearance (ß = 0.41, R2  = .17, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access. However, treatment can be profoundly delayed by a third-party payer authorization process that may be subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and worsened outcomes.

Transplantation of viral-positive hepatitis C-positive kidneys into uninfected recipients offers an opportunity to increase organ access.

The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has provided the impetus to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C virus-positive donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). Thirty D+/R- patients received DAA treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was defined as an undetectable viral load in 12 weeks after treatment. An age-matched cohort of uninfected donor and recipient pairs (D-/R-) transplanted during same time period was used for comparison. The median day of viral detection was postoperative day (POD) 2. The detection of viremia in D+/R- patients was 100%. The initial median viral load was 531 copies/µL (range: 10-1 × 108 copies/µL) with a median peak viral load of 3.4 × 105 copies/µL (range: 804-1.0 × 108 copies/µL). DAAs were initiated on median POD 9 (range: 5-41 days). All 30 patients had confirmed SVR12. During a median follow-up of 10 months, patient and graft survival was 100%, and acute rejection was 6.6% with no major adverse events related to DAA treatment. Delayed graft function was significantly decreased in D+/R- patients as compared to the age-matched cohort (27% vs 60%; P = .01). D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access.

Comparing the Predictive Power of Preoperative Risk Assessment Tools to Best Predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing kidney transplantation have increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events due to histories of hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and dialysis. As such, they are especially in need of accurate preoperative risk assessment. METHODS: We compared three different risk assessment models for their ability to predict major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 1 year after transplant. These were the PORT model, the RCRI model, and the Gupta model. We used a method based on generalized U-statistics to determine statistically significant improvements in the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC), based on a common major adverse cardiac event (MACE) definition. For the top-performing model, we added new covariates into multivariable logistic regression in an attempt to create further improvement in the AUC. RESULTS: The AUCs for MACE at 30 days and 1 year were 0.645 and 0.650 (PORT), 0.633 and 0.661 (RCRI), and finally 0.489 and 0.557 (Gupta), respectively. The PORT model performed significantly better than the Gupta model at 1 year (p=0.039). When the sensitivity was set to 95%, PORT had a significantly higher specificity of 0.227 compared to RCRI's 0.071 (p=0.009) and Gupta's 0.08 (p=0.017). Our additional covariates increased the receiver operator curve from 0.664 to 0.703, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.278). CONCLUSIONS: Of the three calculators, PORT performed best when the sensitivity was set at a clinically relevant level. This is likely due to the unique variables the PORT model uses, which are specific to transplant patients.

Should functioning AV fistulas be ligated after renal transplantation?

PURPOSE: There is limited literature available to guide physicians on a course of action when they are approached by renal transplant recipients regarding the status of their vascular accesses. However, this is a frequent topic of discussion with these patients and there should be guidelines available to assist in the decision of whether to maintain or ligate an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in a successful renal transplant patient. This review intends to present some of the literature, as well as to establish guidelines for management. METHODS: The medical literature was reviewed and anecdotal information from our clinical experience was collected. RESULTS: Taking into account 10-year adjusted renal transplant graft survival rates, and the relative paucity of donors, it is possible that a successfully transplanted patient will have to return to dialysis at some point. After review of the literature, the impact of AVF ligation on the transplant patient's cardiac morphology and function is not clear. Patient and graft survival do not appear to be impacted by persistent AVFs. Emergent closure of the AVF might be required in cases of severe venous hypertension, risk of rupture from pseudoaneurysm, significant high output cardiac failure or ischemic hand. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that following successful renal transplantation, functioning AVFs should almost never be ligated. Many patients require return to dialysis and the physiologic impact of the patent AVF on these patients does not strongly advocate routine ligation following transplant.

Successful transplantation of a donor kidney with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis and crescents--a case report.

Pre-existing diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) in a potential deceased kidney donor has been considered a contraindication for transplantation. We report a case of a patient who underwent a successful deceased donor renal transplantation from a donor with history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) whose baseline biopsy revealed DPGN. Although the histology was relatively benign in the procurement kidney biopsy done by frozen section, the final light microscopy available after transplantation showed diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, WHO class IV, with 44% crescents. The post-transplant course was complicated by delayed allograft function requiring haemodialysis for the first week. A repeat biopsy performed after 4 months of transplant showed resolution of the proliferative lesions in the glomeruli with disappearance of the crescents. At 5.5 years of follow-up, the patient's creatinine has been stable at 2.0 mg/dL (176.8 µmol/L), but he has persistent proteinuria.

Excellent outcome using "impaired" standard criteria donors with elevated serum creatinine.

INTRODUCTION: To maximize organ utilization, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) encourages use of Expanded Criteria Donors (ECD). However, Standard Criteria Donors (SCD) may also be under-utilized, some centers discarding kidneys with serum creatinine (S.Cr) >2.0 at nephrectomy. Our experience with the use of such "impaired'' kidneys was reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: From January 1, 2003 to October 1, 2006, of 130 DD kidneys transplanted at our center, 26 were ECD. Also, 22 kidneys were from Impaired SCD (ISCD), with mean S.Cr 3.2 (2.1-4.4) at nephrectomy; eight of these had S.Cr >4.0. For these 22 ISCD, mean age was 22 yrs (11-42), sex: 16 Males; race:12 Caucasians/10 African-Americans; All had evidence of rhabdomyolysis (Mean peak CPK 11,924 u/l). Thirty-seven percent came from outside OPOs. Recipient demographics: age 45 years; sex 50% male, 45% African-American. Mean HLA match was 1; dialysis was required in 28% within the first week. Mean length of stay was 10.7 days. Average discharge S.Cr was 4.2. All kidneys are currently functioning (S.Cr at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year 1.6, 1.7 and 1.7 respectively). CONCLUSION: An elevated creatinine should not be the only cause for discarding deceased donor kidneys.

Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network recently implemented a policy allocating expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys by waiting time alone. ECD kidneys were defined as having a risk of graft failure > or = 1.7 times that of ideal donors. ECDs include any donor > or = 60 years old and donors 50 to 59 years old with at least two of the following: terminal creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, history of hypertension, or death by cerebrovascular accident. The impact of this policy on use of ECD kidneys is assessed. METHODS: The authors compared use of ECD kidneys recovered in the 18 months immediately before and after policy implementation. Differences were tested using t test and chi2 analyses. RESULTS: There was an 18.3% increase in ECD kidney recoveries and a 15.0% increase in ECD kidney transplants in the first 18 months after policy implementation. ECD kidneys made up 22.1% of all recovered kidneys and 16.8% of all transplants, compared with 18.8% (P<0.001) and 14.5% (P<0.001), respectively, in the prior period. The discard rate was unchanged. The median relative risk (RR) for graft failure for transplanted ECD kidneys was 2.07 versus 1.99 in the prepolicy period (P=not significant); the median RR for procured ECD kidneys was unchanged at 2.16. The percentage of transplanted ECD kidneys with cold ischemia times (CIT) <12 hr increased significantly; the corresponding percentage for CIT > or = 24 hr decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The recent increase in ECD kidney recoveries and transplants appears to be related to implementation of the ECD allocation system.

The effect of sirolimus on sex hormone levels of male renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether sirolimus, a newer immunosuppressive agent, widely used in renal transplantation, affects male sex hormone levels or sexual function. METHODS: Sex hormone profiles in male renal transplant recipients were obtained and compared between a sirolimus-treated group and a group not on sirolimus in a cross-sectional study. Both groups also completed a sexual dysfunction questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-six subjects were evaluated, 32 in the sirolimus group and 34 in the control group. Total testosterone level was significantly lower in the sirolimus group than the control group (393.3 +/- 188 vs. 537.4 +/-232 pg/mL; p = 0.08) while follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels were significantly higher in the sirolimus group (12.8 +/- 14 vs. 6.0 +/- 5, p = 0.013; 10.9 +/- 14 vs. 4.7 +/- 4, p = 0.018, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation between 24-h sirolimus trough and total testosterone levels (p < 0.03). By multiple regression analysis, use of sirolimus was independently associated with decreased total testosterone level. There was no significant difference in subjective sexual dysfunction as assessed by questionnaire scores between the two groups. There was no correlation between questionnaire scores and total testosterone level. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus is associated with decreased total testosterone levels in male renal transplant recipients. It is unclear whether sirolimus may affect other aspects of sexual function.

Successful rescue therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral renal transplant rejection.

Plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) remove donor-specific antibodies, a cause of acute humoral rejection (AHR). We describe the use of PP and IVIg as rescue therapy for AHR. The records of 143 renal transplants performed between October 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002 were reviewed. Patients who underwent PP and IVIg therapy for AHR were identified. The data reviewed included age, sex, source of transplant, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, transplant number, number of PP and IVIg treatments, dose of IVIg, time of AHR, serum creatinine (SCr) level at AHR, SCr level after PP and IVIg at 3 months, days to achieve 30% decline in SCr, and graft survival. Immunosuppression included basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, and prednisone (+/- sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept, Roche Pharmaceutical, Nutley, NJ]). PP was followed by IVIg infusion. Nine patients were treated for AHR with PP and IVIg. All nine patients demonstrated biopsy-proven AHR. One graft was lost. Mean 3-month and 1-year SCr levels were 1.9 and 1.8, respectively, in the remaining eight patients. AHR in renal transplantation can be effectively treated with PP and IVIg.

Inhibitory effect of brachytherapy on intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistula.

PURPOSE: To determine whether endovascular radiation can inhibit intimal hyperplasia in a swine model of hemodialysis access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts (6 mm in diameter) were placed between the common carotid artery and the external jugular vein bilaterally in 8 pigs. Two days after the surgery, fistulography was performed. Gamma radiation (12 Gy) was delivered endovascularly to one of the grafts at the venous anastomosis by using an iridium(192) source. Thus, the other graft in each pig served as an untreated control. Fistulas were evaluated with fistulography or venography 6 week after radiation. All grafts were then harvested for histological and immunohistochemical examination. RESULTS: Seven grafts on the treated side and 5 grafts on the control side remained patent for at least 6 weeks. Angiography demonstrated that the percentage stenosis at the venous anastomosis was significantly lower for the treated group (15.9 +/- 14.1 versus 32.6 +/- 16.7%, P = 0.045). Histopathologic analyses revealed that the mean intimal area and maximal intimal thickness were significantly lower with reduced smooth muscle cell proliferation at the venous anastomosis on the treated side compared to the control side (0.68 +/- 0.30 versus 1.06 +/- 0.29 mm(2), P = 0.017, and 0.18 +/- 0.08 versus 0.26 +/- 0.07 mm, P = 0.004, respectively). The residual lumen was significantly greater for the treated group (1.59 +/- 0.42 versus 1.06 +/- 0.37 mm(2), P = 0.031). No significant differences were found in the area, nor maximal thickness in the vein either proximal or distal to the anastomosis between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In an animal model of hemodialysis access, brachytherapy with iridium(192) delivered 2 days after graft implantation reduces intimal hyperplasia and stenosis at the venous anastomosis. The reduced smooth-muscle cells found in the radiated veins suggests that brachytherapy may exert its effect on neointimal formation by inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation.