An International Virtual Classroom: The Emergency Department Experience at Weill Cornell Medicine and Weill Bugando Medical Center in Tanzania.

Emergency medicine (EM) is rapidly being recognized as a specialty around the globe. This has particular promise for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that experience the largest burden of disease for emergency conditions. Specialty education and training in EM remain essentially an apprenticeship model. Finding the required expertise to educate graduate learners can be challenging in regions where there are low densities of specialty providers.We describe an initiative to implement a sustainable, bidirectional partnership between the Emergency Medicine Departments of Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) in New York, NY, USA, and Bugando Medical Center (BMC) in Mwanza, Tanzania. We used synchronous and asynchronous telecommunication technology to enhance an ongoing emergency medicine education collaboration.The Internet infrastructure for this collaboration was created by bolstering 4G services available in Mwanza, Tanzania. By maximizing the 4G signal, sufficient bandwidth could be created to allow for live 2-way audio/video communication. Using synchronous and asynchronous applications such as Zoom and WhatsApp, providers at WCM and BMC can attend real-time didactic lectures, participate in discussion forums on clinical topics, and collaborate on the development of clinical protocols. Proof of concept exercises demonstrated that this system can be used for real-time mentoring in EKG interpretation and ultrasound technique, for example. This system was also used to share information and develop operations flows during the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of telecommunication technology and e-learning in a format that promotes long-term, sustainable interaction is practical and innovative, provides benefit to all partners, and should be considered as a mechanism by which global partnerships can assist with training in emergency medicine in LMICs.

Telehealth in emergency medicine: A consensus conference to map the intersection of telehealth and emergency medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth has the potential to significantly change the specialty of emergency medicine (EM) and has rapidly expanded in EM during the COVID pandemic; however, it is unclear how EM should intersect with telehealth. The field lacks a unified research agenda with priorities for scientific questions on telehealth in EM. METHODS: Through the 2020 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine's annual consensus conference, experts in EM and telehealth created a research agenda for the topic. The multiyear process used a modified Delphi technique to develop research questions related to telehealth in EM. Research questions were excluded from the final research agenda if they did not meet a threshold of at least 80% of votes indicating "important" or "very important." RESULTS: Round 1 of voting included 94 research questions, expanded to 103 questions in round 2 and refined to 36 questions for the final vote. Consensus occurred with a final set of 24 important research questions spanning five breakout group topics. Each breakout group domain was represented in the final set of questions. Examples of the questions include: "Among underserved populations, what are mechanisms by which disparities in emergency care delivery may be exacerbated or ameliorated by telehealth" (health care access) and "In what situations should the quality and safety of telehealth be compared to in-person care and in what situations should it be compared to no care" (quality and safety). CONCLUSION: The primary finding from the process was the breadth of gaps in the evidence for telehealth in EM and telehealth in general. Our consensus process identified priority research questions for the use of and evaluation of telehealth in EM to fill the current knowledge gaps. Support should be provided to answer the research questions to guide the evidenced-based development of telehealth in EM.

Clinical informatics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and implications for emergency department and inpatient operations.

In response to a pandemic, hospital leaders can use clinical informatics to aid clinical decision making, virtualizing medical care, coordinating communication, and defining workflow and compliance. Clinical informatics procedures need to be implemented nimbly, with governance measures in place to properly oversee and guide novel patient care pathways, diagnostic and treatment workflows, and provider education and communication. The authors' experience recommends (1) creating flexible order sets that adapt to evolving guidelines that meet needs across specialties, (2) enhancing and supporting inherent telemedicine capability, (3) electronically enabling novel workflows quickly and suspending noncritical administrative or billing functions in the electronic health record, and (4) using communication platforms based on tiered urgency that do not compromise security and privacy.

Utilizing Telemedicine in a Novel Approach to COVID-19 Management and Patient Experience in the Emergency Department.

Background: The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted telemedicine as a care delivery tool uniquely suited for a disaster pandemic. Introduction: With support from emergency department (ED) leadership, our institution rapidly deployed telemedicine in a novel approach to large-scale ED infectious disease management at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center (NYP/WCMC) and NewYork-Presbyterian/Lower Manhattan Hospital (NYP/LMH). Materials and Methods: Nineteen telemedicine carts were placed in COVID-19 isolation rooms to conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and mitigate infectious risk for patients and providers by decreasing in-person exposures. Results: The teleisolation carts were used for 261 COVID-19 patient interactions from March to May 2020, with 79% of overall use in March. Our urban academic site (NYP/WCMC) had 173 of these cases, and the urban community hospital (NYP/LMH) had 88. This initiative increased provider/patient communication and attention to staff safety, improved palliative care and patient support services, lowered PPE consumption, and streamlined clinical workflows. The carts also increased patient comfort and reduced the psychological toll of isolation. Discussion: Deploying customized placement strategies in these two EDs maximized cart availability for isolation patients and demonstrates the utility of telemedicine in various ED settings. Conclusions: The successful introduction of this program in both academic and urban community hospitals suggests that widespread adoption of similar initiatives could improve safe ED evaluation of potentially infectious patients. In the longer term, our experience underscores the critical role of telemedicine in disaster preparedness planning, as building these capabilities in advance allows for the agile scaling needed to manage unforeseen catastrophic scenarios.

An Evaluation of Kiosks for Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Using the National Quality Forum Assessment Framework.

Background: Evaluation of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine programs has focused on care delivery via personal electronic devices. Telemedicine kiosks for the delivery of virtual urgent care services have not been systematically described. Introduction: Our institution has placed kiosks for DTC urgent care in pharmacies. These kiosks can be used without a personal electronic device. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of adult patients using pharmacy-based kiosks (kiosk) or personal electronic devices (app) for DTC evaluation. Data for patient characteristics, wait time, technical quality, visit duration diagnosis codes, follow-up recommendations, and whether the patient was traveling were compared. Results were interpreted using the National Quality Forum framework for telemedicine service evaluation, focused on access, experience, and effectiveness. Comparisons were made using chi-square test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Over 1 year there were 1,996 DTC visits; 238 (12%) initiated from kiosks. Kiosk patients were slightly older (mean age 38 ± 13 vs. 35 ± 11; p < 0.001), more likely to be male (52% vs. 39%; p < 0.001), more likely to be remote from home (25% vs. 3%; p < 0.001), and had less technical difficulty (10% vs. 19%; p = 0.003). Referral for urgent in-person evaluation was low in both groups (10% kiosk vs. 16%; app p = 0.017). Discussion: Kiosks may increase access to care and improve technical experience. Low urgent referral rates suggest effective care for both types of visit. Conclusions: Despite their potential advantages, kiosk visits accounted for a minority of overall visits for our DTC telemedicine service line, and daily use of each kiosk location was low.

Telemedicine Evaluations for Low-Acuity Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: Implications for Safety and Patient Satisfaction.

Background:Telemedicine is being rapidly adopted by traditional health care systems. We have used telemedicine in a program we call Express Care to allow a single physician to remotely perform evaluations of low-acuity patients.Materials and Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of quality assurance data comparing low-acuity patients treated by an emergency department (ED) physician through telemedicine (Express Care) with those treated by an ED physician in person between July 16, 2016 and September 30, 2017. We compared patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), visit severity as measured by emergency severity index (ESI), visit diagnosis type, return visits, and patient satisfaction scores.Results:There were 3,266 low-acuity patients seen through telemedicine and 21,129 seen in person during the observation period. Patients receiving evaluation by telemedicine were younger (mean age ± standard deviation [in years]: 42 ± 18 vs. 45 ± 17; p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (51% vs. 46%; p < 0.001). Median ESI was slightly lower for patients treated by telemedicine [4 (4-5) vs. 4 (4-4); p < 0.001], and there were modest differences in diagnosis type between the two groups. Median ED LOS was 63.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 42.6-93.6) min for telemedicine patients and 133.8 (IQR 90.6-196.8) min for patients seen in person (p < 0.001). Seventy-two hour returns (3.4% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.302) and 72-h returns requiring admission (0.2% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.252) were similar between groups. Patient satisfaction scores were also similar between the groups.Conclusion:Telemedicine evaluation for ED patients can be effective and safe when treating low-acuity conditions without compromising patient satisfaction.

Use of Physician-Guided Patient Self-Examination to Diagnose Appendicitis: A Telemedicine Case Report.

Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine platforms have been increasingly implemented by large hospital systems. This care delivery mechanism shares similarities with bedside medical care, but also differs in key attributes such as the inability to perform a "hands-on" physical examination. Methods: We present a case of DTC telehealth evaluation that resulted in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The case of one female patient presenting to our urgent care mobile application and subsequently to the emergency department (ED) is discussed. Results: Physician-guided patient self-examination of the abdomen demonstrated concordance with findings on bedside physical examination in the ED, leading to the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conclusions: For the patient presented here, physician-guided patient self-examination resulted in appropriate referral to the ED and diagnosis of appendicitis. Additional research on the reproducibility of virtual physical examination findings and potential cost savings of telemedicine visits is warranted.

A Novel Emergency Department-Based Telemedicine Program: How Do Older Patients Fare?

Introduction:When we started using telemedicine to treat low acuity patients in the emergency department (ED), we assumed that this voluntary treatment pathway would primarily be used by younger patients. We were surprised to find that a significant portion of patients evaluated by telemedicine were older adults.Materials and Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of quality assurance data. Adult ED patients at an urban academic medical center who had their care provided by telemedicine from July 2016 to September 2017 were included. We measured demographic characteristics, ED length of stay (LOS), triage severity score, X-ray orders placed, ED revisit within 72 h, need for change in treatment plan or admission on 72-h return, and patient satisfaction.Results:Of 1,592 patients evaluated, 18% were age 65 and older. Older patients were more likely to be evaluated for wound care and less likely to be evaluated for nontraumatic connective tissue illnesses. Older patients also had shorter median LOS (59 min vs. 63 min). Unplanned 72-h return (2% vs. 2%), likelihood to have a change in treatment on return (1% vs. 0.2%), and patient satisfaction were similar between age groups. The percentage of patients who returned in 72 h requiring admission were similar between age groups (0.4% vs. 0.1% p = 0.325). Sensitivity analysis with an age threshold at 75 years did not change primary results.Conclusion:These findings suggest that among low acuity patients there are groups of older adults for whom an ED telemedicine evaluation can provide safe and effective medical care that is satisfactory to patients.

Increasing frequency and fatality of poison control center reported exposures involving medication and multiple substances: data from reports of the American Association of Poison Control Centers 1984-2013.

CONTEXT: Medication use has become increasingly prevalent in the United States, with up trending use of both prescription and over the counter medication. The increasing use and availability of medication may be changing the nature of poisoning fatality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in fatal poisoning over time, with respect to fatalities involving one or more medications, using annual reports published by the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: AAPCC annual reports were reviewed from 1984 to 2013. Data from tables in each annual report titled Number of Substances Involved in Human Exposure Cases and Summary of Fatal Exposures were abstracted. Fatality rates and changes in these rates over time were calculated for exposures to 1, 2, or ≥ 3 substances. All substances detailed in Summary of Fatal Exposures tables were then coded as medication or non-medication. The percentage of fatalities involving 1, 2, or ≥ 3 medications was calculated and trended over time. Subset analysis was performed to compare the periods 1984-2005 and 2006-2013 in order to limit confounding from changes in reporting. Secondary analysis linking the number of substances cases were exposed to and the fatality rate was performed for data from 2006-2013. RESULTS: There were 59,866,357 human exposures and 29,659 fatalities reported from 1984 to 2013. There were 49.5 fatalities per 100,000 exposures. The majority of fatalities (52.2%) involved more than one substance, although multiple substances were involved in only 8.3% of exposures. Fatality rates increased over time and were higher for cases involving multiple substances. Medications were involved in 79.2% of fatalities, a percentage that increased from 70% in the 1980s to nearly 90% after 2010. In recent years, the majority of fatalities have involved multiple medications. For data from 2006-2013 there was a strong association between fatality rate and number of substances involved in an exposure (221 additional fatalities per 100,000 exposures for each additional substance involved in an exposure). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Multiple substance exposures have become a greater percentage of cases reported to the AAPCC and have higher fatality rates than single substance exposures. The majority of fatal poisonings reported to the AAPCC between 1984 and 2013 involved medication. The percentage of fatal poisonings involving medication increased over the interval, as did the percentage of fatalities involving more than one medication. Fatalities involving multiple medications are now the most common type of fatal poisoning reported to the AAPCC.

The ED as the primary source of hospital admission for older (but not younger) adults.

INTRODUCTION: The elderly population in the United States is growing. This age shift has important implications for emergency departments (EDs), which currently account for more than 50% of inpatient hospitalizations. Our objective was to compare the percentage of inpatient admissions starting in the ED between elderly and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Source of admission to the hospital was evaluated for years 2003 to 2009. Total admissions from the ED and trends over time were analyzed for the following age groups: 22 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ years old. Likelihood of having been admitted from the ED was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1.7 million survey visits representing 216 million adult hospitalizations were analyzed. A total of 93 million (43.2%) were among patients 65 years and older. The ED was the source of admission for 57.3% of patients 65 years and older and 44.4% of patients 64 years and younger (95% confidence interval difference, 12.97%-13.00%). By 2009, more than 75% of nonelective admissions for patients 85 years and older were through the ED. There was a linear relationship between age and the ED as the source of admission, the odds increasing by 2.9% per year (95% confidence interval, 1.029-1.029) for each year beyond age 65 years. CONCLUSION: Emergency departments are increasingly used as the gateway for hospital admission for older adults. An aging US population may increase the effect of this trend, a prospect that should be planned for. From the patient perspective, barriers to care contributing to the age-based discrepancy in the use of the ED as source of admission should be investigated.

Trends in short-stay hospitalizations for older adults from 1990 to 2010: implications for geriatric emergency care.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric patients are more likely than younger patients to be admitted to the hospital when they present to the emergency department (ED). Identifying trends in geriatric short-stay admission may inform the development of interventions designed to improve acute care for the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in US geriatric short-stay hospitalizations from 1990 to 2010. METHODS: Retrospective study using the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS). Trends in short-stay hospitalizations were analyzed from 1990 to 2010 for age groups 22 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and at least 85 years using linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 4.5 million survey visits representing 580 million adult hospitalizations were available for analysis; 250 million (43%) were among patients 65 years or older. Of these, 12%, 25%, and 40% were ≤ 1, ≤ 2 and ≤ 3 days' short-stay admissions, respectively. Between 1990 and 2010, short-stay admissions increased as a percentage of total hospitalizations for each geriatric age group but remained relatively constant for younger adults. Admissions from NHDS were similar to admissions from the ED for years where ED-specific data were available. The older a patient was (age >65 years), the more likely their admission was to have started in the ED. DISCUSSION: For all elderly patients, short-stay admissions represented a growing proportion of total admissions, regardless of the definition of short stay. These trends were identified despite the NHDS exclusion of observation status hospitalizations. The increase in short-stay admissions was the most pronounced in the extreme elderly (age ≥ 85 years). Future research is needed to optimize treatment for geriatric patients presenting to the ED, some of whom, with brief observation and appropriate follow-up, may be better cared for without hospitalization.

Improving front-end flow in an urban academic medical center emergency department: the emergency department discharge facilitator team.

Length of stay (LOS) is an important determinant of patient satisfaction and overall emergency department (ED) operational efficiency. In an effort to reduce length of stay for low-acuity "treated and released" patients, our department created a discharge facilitator team (DFT) composed of an attending physician, physician assistant, and registered nurse. The DFT identified patients who could be rapidly treated and released in the low-acuity treatment Adult Urgent Care Center (AUCC) and provided them rapid treatment and discharge. To assess the efficacy of the DFT, linear regression was used to compare AUCC LOS at times the team was and was not active. Patients seen by the DFT had a LOS that was 35 % shorter than other AUCC patients. There was a 28-min reduction in AUCC LOS during periods where the DFT was active (95% CI 22 to 33 min). We conclude that the establishment of a DFT was associated with a significant reduction in LOS for all low-acuity patients. Other academic medical centers may consider implementing a similar program in order to reduce LOS and improve ED throughput for low acuity patients.

A novel comprehensive in-training examination course can improve residency-wide scores.

INTRODUCTION: The annual American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) in-training examination is a tool to assess resident progress and knowledge. We implemented a course at the New York-Presbyterian Emergency Medicine Residency Program to improve ABEM scores and evaluate its effect. Previously, the examination was not emphasized and resident performance was lower than expected. METHODS: As an adjunct to required weekly residency conferences, an intensive 14-week in-training examination preparation program was developed that included lectures, pre-tests, high-yield study sheets, and a remediation program. We compared each residents in-training examination score to the postgraduate year-matched national mean. Scores before and after course implementation were evaluated by repeat measures regression modeling. Residency performance was evaluated by comparing residency average to the national average each year and by tracking ABEM national written examination pass rates. RESULTS: Following the course's introduction, odds of a resident scoring higher than the national average increased by 3.9 (95% CI 1.9-7.3) and percentage of residents exceeding the national average increased by 37% (95% CI 23%-52%). In the time since the course was started the overall residency mean score has outperformed the national average and the first-time ABEM written examination board pass rate has been 100%. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted residency-wide examination curriculum focused around an intensive 14-week course was associated with marked improvement on the in-training examination.

Injury and illness in college outdoor education.

OBJECTIVE: Many colleges offer outdoor education courses such as rock climbing, kayaking, and mountain biking. Since these sports may be perceived as dangerous, we describe the prevalence of injuries and illnesses in a large, university-based outdoor education program. We also compare composite incident rates from this outdoor program to those of traditional college sports. METHODS: Cohort of college students participating in either Cornell Outdoor Education (COE) or National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports and comparison of incident rates. COE data were prospectively collected in the field; and NCAA data were prospectively collected through the Association's Injury Surveillance System. By definition, a COE injury or illness required follow-up care, prescription medication, or limited course participation. Similarly, a NCAA injury limited further practice or play. Incident rates were calculated as injuries and illnesses per 1000 participant-days (COE) or injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures (NCAA). RESULTS: Included COE courses during 2002-2007 totaled 74 005 participant-days. There were 111 injuries and illnesses, rate = 1.50/1000 participant-days (95% CI 1.24-1.81). The NCAA reported 32 646 899 athlete-exposures during 1988-2004 and 181 476 injuries, rate = 5.56/1000 athlete-exposures (95% CI 5.53-5.58). Compared to COE, the relative risk of injury in NCAA sports was 3.7 (95% CI 3.1-4.5) overall and 3.3 (95% CI 2.8-4.0) after excluding the high-contact sports of football, ice hockey, and wrestling. For COE, mountain biking had the highest incident rate (7.5/1000), which was significantly lower than game injury rates in NCAA football and soccer. The most common injuries for both NCAA and COE were soft-tissue injuries such as sprains and strains. CONCLUSION: Outdoor education at this university-sponsored program was at least as safe as traditional college sports. Overall, college students were less likely to be injured while participating in COE courses than while participating in NCAA sports, even after excluding high-contact sports from the comparison.

Low-dose naloxone does not improve morphine-induced nausea, vomiting, or pruritus.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that low-dose naloxone delivered with intravenous (IV) bolus morphine to emergency department patients in pain would reduce nausea. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients receiving 0.10 mg/kg morphine IV bolus rated pain, nausea, and pruritus on 100-mm visual analog scales at enrollment and 20 minutes. Patients were randomized to 0.25 microg/kg naloxone or equal volume placebo administered with IV morphine. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one enrolled, 99 (76%) treated according to protocol with sufficient data for analysis. At 20 minutes the difference between groups (naloxone-placebo) was 1 mm (95% CI [confidence interval], -9 to 11) for nausea, 1 mm (95% CI, -3 to 3) for pruritus, 4% (95% CI, -1 to 9) for vomiting, and 0% (95% CI, -5 to 5) for rescue antiemetics. Pain was significantly reduced in both groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of 0.25 microg/kg naloxone to bolus morphine does not improve nausea, pruritus, vomiting, or reduce use of rescue antiemetics when administered to emergency department patients in pain.

Emergency department visits for home medical device failure during the 2003 North America blackout.

OBJECTIVES: During a widespread North American blackout in August 2003, the authors identified a cluster of patients presenting to their northern Manhattan emergency department (ED) with complaints related to medical device failure. The characteristics of this group with respect to presenting complaint, type of device failure, time spent in the ED, and disposition are described in an effort to better understand the resource needs of this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review for all patients evaluated in an urban teaching ED during a 24-hour period spanning the duration of regional power failure. Charts for patients presenting with medical device failure as part of their triage complaint were abstracted. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 255 patients coming to the ED during the 24-hour period presented with medical device failure. Nineteen of the device failures were due to nonfunctioning oxygen conservers, three to ventilator failure, and two to airway suction device failure (one patient had two devices fail). Thirteen of these patients were admitted to the hospital and accounted for 22% of all admissions during the study interval. Discharged patients spent a mean of 15.1 hours (range: 3.8-24.4 hours) in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Patients using electrical medical devices seek care in the ED when power failure occurs, and they require significant ED and hospital resources. Effective disaster planning should anticipate the needs of this population.

Is single observer identification of wound infection a reliable endpoint?

The majority of wound studies over the past 20 years have relied on single observer determination of infection presence or absence as a study endpoint. Nevertheless, there are few data on the reliability of those determinations. If single observer determinations are not reliable, the validity of studies using this endpoint should be questioned. Two physicians independently evaluated wounds for presence or absence of the primary endpoint of infection and the secondary endpoints of purulence, tenderness, warmth, and erythema. Kappa values were calculated as measures of inter-observer agreement, which was used as a measure of reliability. Of 125 patients enrolled, 115 wounds were available for analysis. Kappa =.57 [95%CI.39 to.75] for the primary endpoint of infection,.84 for purulence,.72 for tenderness,.48 for warmth, and.48 for erythema. Agreement on two features of infection and overall agreement on the presence or absence of wound infection was only 'moderate.' Single observer determination of wound infection by inexperienced observers using imprecise definitions, though commonly used, is an unreliable measure for scientific study.