Comparison of long-acting injectable antipsychotics with oral antipsychotics and hospital readmission rates in pediatric patients.

Introduction: Studies indicate that long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) reduce the risk of relapse and hospitalization compared with oral antipsychotics (APs) in adults. Oral formulations of APs are well-studied in the pediatric population, but little is known regarding the off-label use of LAIAs in this population. Methods: This retrospective chart review evaluated readmission rates for pediatric patients admitted to a psychiatric ward in a large academic hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 1, 2022, requiring AP therapy. The experimental group included patients initiated on LAIA therapy, and the control group included patients initiated on a new oral AP. Patients were matched by several clinical factors. Results: Each group consisted of 38 patients. For the primary outcome, hospital readmission rates at 3 months, the LAIA group had a 13.2% readmission rate compared with 26.3% in the comparator group (p = .153). In months 4 through 6, there was a 5.3% versus 15.8% readmission rate, respectively (p = .139). In months 7 through 12, it was 7.9% versus 18.4% (p = .179). There were significantly fewer cumulative readmissions at the 1-year mark in the LAIA group (N = 9, 23.7%) compared with the oral AP group (N = 18, 47.4%) (p = .031). No statistically significant differences were seen in hospital length of stay although results numerically favored LAIA. Discussion: In a pediatric population, the administration of an LAIA when compared with the oral equivalent resulted in numerically fewer hospital readmissions, decreased length of stay, and fewer adverse effects, but these effects were not statistically significant except for cumulative readmissions at 1 year.

Efficacy of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Preventing Psychiatric Rehospitalizations.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a chronic, debilitating mental illness that incurs a large economic burden. Decreasing hospital readmissions is a priority in health care to improve patient quality of life and decrease health care costs. Determining ways to prevent readmissions such as improving access to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics is important to assess. METHODS/PROCEDURES: A single-center retrospective review was conducted comparing readmission rates of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder discharged on LAI or oral antipsychotics between August 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. The primary outcome was the 30-day psychiatric readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included chlorpromazine equivalent doses and use of anticholinergic medications. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 1.9% for the LAI antipsychotic group and 8.3% for the oral antipsychotic group ( P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-20.02). The average chlorpromazine equivalent antipsychotic dose of patients discharged on LAI versus oral antipsychotic medications was 477.3 and 278.6 mg/d, respectively ( P < 0.001). In addition, the prevalence of medications used to treat extrapyramidal symptom was 22.3% (n = 23) for the LAI antipsychotic group and 30.8% (n = 74) for the oral antipsychotic group ( P = 0.12). Sixty-four percent of LAI antipsychotics utilized were obtained from pharmaceutical company hospital inpatient free trial programs. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics showed a statistically significant reduction in 30-day rehospitalizations as compared with oral antipsychotics and hospital inpatient free trial programs aided in LAI antipsychotic acquisition.

Readmission Rates of Patients Discharged on Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Compared to Antipsychotic Monotherapy.

Antipsychotic medications are used to treat many psychiatric conditions and are paramount for relapse prevention in patients with mental illnesses. Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is a commonly recommended approach, however there is no clear consensus on the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP). A single-center retrospective review was conducted comparing readmission rates of behavioral health patients discharged on APP or APM between August 1st 2019 and July 31st 2021. The primary outcome was the one-year psychiatric readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included further readmission time frame stratification, olanzapine equivalent doses, and use of anticholinergic medications. The total readmission rate was 24.5% (24/98) in the APP group compared to 19.1% (107/560) in the APM group (p = 0.22). Patients discharged on APM were not found to have a statistically significant increase in readmission rate compared to patients discharged on APP. Further research is needed to assess the risks and benefits of APP.

Objective and subjective benefits of a psychiatric pharmacist-led long-acting injectable medication training at a large, multisite organization.

INTRODUCTION: Many psychiatric, long-acting injectable (LAI) medications are available, and each product comes with its own unique challenges. Improper administration can lead to pain, decreased efficacy, and loss of trust in the patient-provider relationship. This study was conducted to determine if a pharmacist-led, 1-hour training was successful in increasing psychiatric LAI medication knowledge through a pretest and posttest. The study also assessed staff satisfaction, confidence, and relevance to practice through a feedback questionnaire. METHODS: Four 1-hour live trainings took place in November 2019. Thirty-five nurses and 8 medical assistants attended 1 of the trainings. A pretest and posttest was administered to determine the training's efficacy, and then a final assessment was administered 4 to 6 weeks after the training. Additionally, a participant feedback questionnaire was given to determine the perceived benefits of the training. RESULTS: The primary outcome was to compare pretest and posttest scores. The pretest average score was 67%, the posttest average score was 97%, and the average score 4 to 6 weeks after the training was 97%. The secondary outcome was to review feedback questionnaires to determine the perceived benefit and effectiveness of the training. Ninety-five percent of participants selected that they were very satisfied with the training, 88% selected they would definitely use the information presented in their work, and 93% selected that they had a lot of confidence in the topic after the training. DISCUSSION: A psychiatric LAI medication training administered to nursing staff and medical assistants improved knowledge scores and was perceived as being useful.

Costs of adalimumab versus infliximab as first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomised controlled trials demonstrate that the anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) therapies infliximab and adalimumab are effective in inducing remission and preventing relapse of Crohn's disease (CD). As few studies have compared costs and efficacy of these two drugs directly, we examined this issue. METHODS: Data were collected for patients receiving either drug as first-line anti-TNFα for CD. Patients were matched as closely as possible on age, gender, weight, height, and date of commencement of therapy. Response to induction therapy was assessed at 12weeks, and sustained clinical benefit at last point of follow-up. Resource data were collected for all patients until study end, with National Health Services reference costs applied to calculate the total cost per patient with adalimumab compared with infliximab. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had been treated with adalimumab as first-line anti-TNFα since 2010. We matched an identical number of infliximab patients. Demographic data were similar between the two groups. Costs were significantly lower with adalimumab (£6692.95 less per patient (95% confidence interval £1816.61-£11569.29)), which was largely driven by the drug costs and drug administration costs associated with infliximab. Twenty-nine (80.6%) patients responded to induction therapy with both drugs, and 22 (61.1%) achieved glucocorticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit with either drug at last point of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Costs of infliximab used as first-line anti-TNFα therapy are greater, which may have implications for selection. Clinical outcomes appeared comparable, although power to detect a statistically significant difference would be limited.

Efficacy of infliximab in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a single-centre experience.

AIM: To suggest infliximab (IFX) is effective for acute severe ulcerative colitis, from real-life clinical practice. METHODS: All patients receiving IFX for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis in a single centre were included. Data were extracted from clinical records in order to assess response to IFX therapy. The primary endpoint was colectomy-free survival, and secondary outcomes included glucocorticosteroid-free remission and safety, which was evaluated by recording deaths and adverse events. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those who underwent colectomy and those who were colectomy-free, both at discharge from their index admission, and during follow-up after an initial response to IFX were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (16 females, mean age 36 years) received IFX between May 2006 and January 2012 for acute severe ulcerative colitis. The median duration of follow-up post-first infusion was 396 d (interquartile range = 173-828 d). There were 21 (47.7%) patients with < 1 year of follow-up, 10 (22.7%) with 1 years to 2 years of follow-up, and 13 (29.5%) with > 2 years of follow-up post-first infusion of IFX. Overall, 35 (79.5%) responded to IFX, avoiding colectomy during their index admission, 29 (65.9%) were colectomy-free at last point of follow-up (median follow-up 396 d), and 25 (56.8%) were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission at end of follow-up. There was one death from post-operative sepsis, 20 d after a single IFX infusion. Colectomy rates were generally lower among those "bridging" to thiopurine. Of 18 patients "bridged" to thiopurine therapy, 17 (94.4%) were colectomy-free, and 15 (83.3%) were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission at study end. No predictors of response were identified. CONCLUSION: IFX is effective for acute severe ulcerative colitis in real-life clinical practice. Two-thirds of patients avoided colectomy, and more than 50% were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission.