Management of the third stage of labor in second-trimester deliveries: How long is too long?

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta is the most common second-trimester delivery complication. As the optimal third stage of labor duration remains undefined, complications associated with retained placentas are difficult to study. OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the optimal third stage of labor duration in second-trimester deliveries based on estimates of time-specific probabilities of placental delivery, placental intervention, and postpartum complication. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively studied adult women with singleton second-trimester vaginal deliveries. We identified third stage of labor duration, placental delivery method (spontaneous vs. manual/operative intervention), and indication for intervention. Postpartum complication was examined as a composite outcome. Differences among groups defined by delivery method and postpartum complication were tested using parametric and nonparametric tests. Probability curves describing the time-specific probabilities of placental delivery were derived using lifetable methods with group differences tested using the log-rank test. Probability of placental intervention and complication by time to placental delivery were examined using logistic regression with adjustment for confounders and other predictors. RESULTS: We identified 215 second-trimester placental deliveries (77% spontaneous, 23% intervention). Overall, 27% experienced postpartum complication, primarily hemorrhage (91%). Complication rates differed significantly between spontaneous placental deliveries (16%) and interventions (61%, P < 0.01). Both placental intervention and postpartum complication were strongly associated with longer time to placental delivery. Spontaneous placental deliveries occurred earlier than deliveries requiring intervention (P < 0.01). At 2 h, placental delivery rates were 93% in spontaneous deliveries and 39% in those requiring intervention. The overall postpartum complication rate for spontaneous placental deliveries (16%) was used as the threshold of tolerable risk and the criterion for placental intervention. Adjusted probability curves for deliveries of average gestational age (21.6 weeks) suggested that most patients (63.9%) may not require intervention until approximately 2 h following fetal delivery. Patients with PPROM would require intervention by 34 min, and those with intrapartum fever or delivery EBL ≥500 mL would already exceed the risk threshold at fetal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an optimal third stage of labor duration of approximately 2 h maximizes probability of spontaneous delivery and minimizes complication risk. Timing of intervention may be further individualized for patients based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum conditions.

Does current cefazolin dosing achieve adequate tissue and blood concentrations in obese women undergoing cesarean section?

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of antibiotics preceding cesarean delivery is the most effective measure taken for preventing postpartum infection. While obese women are at greater risk for infection than non-obese women, evidence-based recommendations for modifying dosing in these women are limited. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether obese women undergoing cesarean delivery similarly reach adequate cefazolin concentrations within tissue and blood when weighing <120kg and dosed 2g versus weighing ≥120kg and dosed 3g. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively studied women ≥18 years old with body mass index ≥30kg/m2 who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery with singleton pregnancy from August 2014 through March 2016. Women were dosed with 2g and 3g of cefazolin for body weights <120kg and ≥120kg, respectively. Samples of subcutaneous adipose tissue (following skin incision and before skin closure), myometrial tissue, fetal cord blood, and maternal blood were collected to assess whether cefazolin concentrations were adequate, i.e., at/above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Concentrations, based on inhibition zones for Streptococcus sanguinis, were calculated per gram of solid tissue and milliliter of blood. For all sample types, log-transformed concentrations were compared between dosage groups. Using a range of published MICs (1-8µg/mL or µg/g), odds ratios, describing differential odds of falling below the MIC between dosage groups, were also computed. RESULTS: Women who received 2g (n=65) versus 3g (n=19) of cefazolin did not significantly differ by maternal or gestational age, race/ethnicity, pre-operative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss, fluid administration, duration of surgery, or timing of sample collections relative to cefazolin administration (Ps>0.05). Dosage groups also did not differ in cefazolin concentration (median [interquartile range]) within adipose tissue following skin incision (5.30µg/g [3.00-9.60] vs. 6.35µg/g [3.90-8.40]; P=0.551), adipose tissue before skin closure (4.45µg/g [2.78-7.25] vs. 6.90µg/g [2.60-10.6]; P=0.342), myometrial tissue (13.1µg/g [8.60-19.6] vs. 15.7µg/g [10.8-21.7]; P=0.116), or maternal blood (41.6µg/mL [26.3-57.0] vs. 45.3µg/mL [36.7-68.3]; P=0.143). However, cord blood concentrations differed significantly (19.5µg/mL [13.7-28.5] vs. 27.9µg/mL [15.8-39.4]; P=0.032), and, in 3 of 5 sample types, group concentrations differed at the dosing cut-point of 120kg (Ps<0.02). Within the range of MICs considered, differences in the odds of concentration inadequacy were not detected between dosage groups for any sample type. Across all patients, inadequate concentrations in one or more solid tissue types were observed in 1.19%, 17.9%, 59.5%, and 86.9% of patients, given the MICs of 1µg/g, 2µg/g, 4µg/g and 8µg/g, respectively. In adipose tissues, specifically, and both dosage groups, mean concentrations were significantly lower than the MIC of 8µg/g (Ps<0.03). Concentrations in one or both blood sample types were inadequate for only 8.33% of patients, given the 8-µg/mL MIC. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate cefazolin concentrations were achieved in blood for the majority of our patients. However, concentration adequacy was not achieved in solid tissue for a nearly equally large proportion of patients. Larger scale studies for determining modified protocols for dosing and applying MICs are warranted.

Trends and Progress in Reducing Teen Birth Rates and the Persisting Challenge of Eliminating Racial/Ethnic Disparities.

PURPOSE: We examined progress made by the Milwaukee community toward achieving the Milwaukee Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative's aggressive 2008 goal of reducing the teen birth rate to 30 live births/1000 females aged 15-17 years by 2015. We further examined differential teen birth rates in disparate racial and ethnic groups. METHOD: We analyzed teen birth count data from the Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health system and demographic data from the US Census Bureau. We computed annual 2003-2014 teen birth rates for the city and four racial/ethnic groups within the city (white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Hispanic/Latina, Asian non-Hispanic). To compare birth rates from before (2003-2008) and after (2009-2014) goal setting, we used a single-system design to employ two time series analysis approaches, celeration line, and three standard deviation (3SD) bands. RESULTS: Milwaukee's teen birth rate dropped 54 % from 54.3 in 2003 to 23.7 births/1000 females in 2014, surpassing the goal of 30 births/1000 females 3 years ahead of schedule. Rate reduction following goal setting was statistically significant, as five of the six post-goal data points were located below the celeration line and points for six consecutive years (2010-2014) fell below the 3SD band. All racial/ethnic groups demonstrated significant reductions through at least one of the two time series approaches. The gap between white and both black and Hispanic/Latina teens widened. CONCLUSION: Significant reduction has occurred in the overall teen birth rate of Milwaukee. Achieving an aggressive reduction in teen births highlights the importance of collaborative community partnerships in setting and tracking public health goals.

Tumor diameter as a predictor of lymphatic dissemination in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of tumor diameter (TD) for predicting lymphatic dissemination (LD) and determining need for lymphadenectomy following diagnosis of endometrioid endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III endometrioid endometrial cancer during 2003-2013 who underwent pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy during hysterectomy were studied. Intraoperative predictors of LD included TD, grade, myometrial invasion (MI), age, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Candidate logistic regression models of LD were evaluated for model fit and predictive power. RESULTS: Of 737 cancer patients, 68 (9.2%) were node-positive. Single-variable models with only continuous TD (c-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and dichotomous TD with 50-mm cut-off (TD50; c-statistic 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.78) were significantly more predictive than with the standard 20-mm cut-off (c-statistic 0.56, 95% CI 0.53-0.59). Overall, the most important LD predictors were TD50 and MI3rds (three-category form). The best candidate model (c-statistic 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) suggested odds of LD were five times greater for TD >50mm than ≤50mm (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.73-8.82) and six and ten times greater for MI >33% to ≤66% (OR, 5.70; 95% CI, 2.25-14.5) and >66% (OR 10.2, 95% CI 4.11-25.4), respectively, than ≤33%. Best-model false-negative (0%) and positive (57.2%) rates demonstrated marked improvement over traditional risk-stratification false-negative (1.5%) and positive (76.2%) rates (c-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor diameter is an important predictor of LD. Our risk model, containing modified forms of MI and TD, yielded a lower false-negative rate and can significantly decrease the number of lymphadenectomies performed on low-risk women.

Foley catheter placement for induction of labor with or without stylette: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Foley catheters are used for cervical ripening during induction of labor. Previous studies suggest that use of a stylette (a thin, rigid wire) to guide catheter insertion decreases insertion failure. However, stylette effects on insertion outcomes have been sparsely studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare catheter insertion times, patient-assessed pain levels, and insertion failure rates between women who received a digitally placed Foley catheter for cervical ripening with the aid of a stylette and women who received the catheter without a stylette. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of women aged ≥ 18 years who presented for induction of labor. Inclusion criteria were singletons with intact membranes and cephalic presentation. Women received a computer-generated random assignment of a Foley catheter insertion with a stylette (treatment group, n = 62) or without a stylette (control group, n = 61). For all women, a standard insertion technique protocol was used. Three primary outcomes were of interest, including the following: (1) insertion time (total minutes to successful catheter placement), (2) patient-assessed pain level (0-10), and (3) failure rate of the randomly assigned insertion method. Treatment control differences were first examined using the Pearson's test of independence and the Student t test. Per outcome, we also constructed 4 regression models, each including the random effect of physician and fixed effects of stylette use with patient nulliparity, a history of vaginal delivery, cervical dilation at presentation, or postgraduate year of the performing resident physician. RESULTS: Women who received the Foley catheter with the stylette vs without the stylette did not differ by age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, or any of several other characteristics. Regression models revealed that insertion time, patient pain, and insertion failure were unrelated to stylette use, nulliparity, and history of vaginal delivery. However, overall insertion time and failure were significantly influenced by cervical dilation, with insertion time decreasing by 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-34%) and odds of failure decreasing by 71% (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.86) per 1 cm dilation. Resident postgraduate year also significantly influenced insertion time, with greater time required of physicians with less experience. Mean insertion time was 51% (95% CI, 23-69%) shorter for fourth-year than second-year residents. Statistically nonsignificant but prominent patterns in outcomes were also observed, suggesting stylette use may lengthen the overall insertion procedure but minimize variability in pain levels and decrease insertion failure. CONCLUSIONS: The randomized trial suggests that, even after accounting for nulliparity, history of vaginal delivery, cervical dilation, and physician experience, Foley catheter insertions with and without a stylette are equivalent in insertion times, patient pain levels, and failure of catheter placement.

Improving Quality Metric Adherence to Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy among Surgeons Within a Multihospital Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive breast biopsy (MIBB) is the procedure of choice for diagnosing breast lesions indeterminate for malignancy. Multihospital health care systems face challenges achieving systemwide adherence to standardized guidelines among surgeons with varying practice patterns. This study tested whether providing individual feedback about surgeons' use of MIBB to diagnose breast malignancies improved quality metric adherence across a large health care organization. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective matched-pairs study to test differences (or lack of agreement) between periods before and after intervention. All analytical cases of primary breast cancer diagnosed during 2011 (period 1) and from July 2012 to June 2013 (period 2) across a multihospital health care system were reviewed for initial diagnosis by MIBB or open surgical biopsy. Open surgical biopsy was considered appropriate care only if MIBB could not be performed for reasons listed in the American Society of Breast Surgeons' quality measure for preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Individual and systemwide results of adherence to the MIBB metric during period 1 were sent to each surgeon in June 2012 and were later compared with period 2 results using McNemar's test of marginal homogeneity for matched binary responses. RESULTS: Forty-six surgeons were evaluated on use of MIBB to diagnose breast cancer. In period 1, metric adherence for 100% of cases was achieved by 37 surgeons, for a systemwide 100% compliance rate of 80.4%. After notification of individual performance, 44 of 46 surgeons used MIBB solely or otherwise appropriate care to diagnose breast cancer, which improved systemwide compliance to 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Providing individual and systemwide performance results to surgeons can increase self-awareness of practice patterns when diagnosing breast cancer, leading to standardized best-practice care across a large health care organization.