Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 103(2): 1012-21, 1998 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9479755

ABSTRACT

In experiment 1, masking patterns were obtained with a tonal masker that was sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at a rate of 8 Hz and a depth (m) of 1.0. The signal was centered at a masker peak or masker valley. Masker frequency (fm) was 750, 1350, or 2430 Hz, and signal frequency (fs) ranged from 0.8 to 1.62 fm. Thresholds were generally higher for a signal in a masker peak than in a masker valley. The magnitude of this peak-to-valley (PV) difference was governed by fs/fm, rather than by fs, and was largest for fs > fm. The PV differences were smallest at the lowest fm, at least when fs > fm. In experiment 2, growth-of-masking functions were measured (fm = 1350 Hz, fs = 1.44fm). The masker was modulated at a depth (m) of 1.0, 0.75, or 0.50. These thresholds were compared with those obtained with an unmodulated masker in forward or simultaneous masking. The comparisons suggest that thresholds for a signal at a peak of an 8-Hz SAM masker are due to simultaneous masking, while those in a valley are due primarily to forward masking when m = 1.0 or simultaneous masking when m = 0.75 or 0.50. For these masker depths, the PV difference first increased but then decreased as masker level increased from 60 to 90 dB SPL. This was a consequence of the slope of the masking function for peak placement changing from a value greater than 2.0 to a value of 1.0 at the highest signal levels (an effect that was also observed with the unmodulated simultaneous masker), a result that may be understood in terms of basilar membrane nonlinearity.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Perceptual Masking , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...