ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy with a CD4 cell count-driven structured treatment interruption (STI) strategy. The primary end-point was the proportion of subjects maintaining CD4 cell count > 400 x 10 cells/l. Secondary end-points were to identify the dynamic and predictive variables of CD4 cell loss. METHODS: The BASTA study is a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Patients with CD4 cell counts > 800 x 10 cells/l were enrolled and the immunological threshold to resume therapy was set to the lower normal limit of CD4 cells for HIV-uninfected adults. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were randomized and followed for 64 weeks. At baseline, all had undetectable plasma HIV RNA and their mean CD4 cell count was 1077 x 10 cells/l. None of the patients showed a disease progression or any AIDS-defining event. At each time point, the proportion of subjects in the STI group that had a CD4 cell count < 400 x 10 cells/l was not statistically different from the control group. In all cases, the 95% confidence interval for this difference was smaller than +/-10%. However, 57% of patients with nadir CD4 cell count 200-350 x 10 cells/l reached a CD4 cell count < 400 x 10 cells/l. This was statistically different (P = 0.02) from the nearly 90% of patients with a nadir CD4 cell count 350-500 x 10 cells/l who maintained a CD4 cell count of > 400 x 10 cells/l. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged STI in patients with fully suppressed virus and marked immune reconstitution is generally safe. The main predictor of CD4 cell decline is the nadir CD4 cell count. Pulse therapy warrants further careful prospective evaluation to investigate virological and clinical outcomes over a very long period.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1 , Adult , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral/blood , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Complex antiretroviral regimens require optimal adherence to maintain long-lasting effectiveness. Simpler regimens, possibly with easy schedule and low pill burden, are needed for the long-term treatment of HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compared with two other conventional twice-a-day regimens. METHODS: In a prospective and randomized study, antiretroviral-naive patients received either EFV+ddl+3TC (once-a-day regimen; OD), or EFV+Combivir (twice-a-day and low-pill burden regimen; BID-low) or NFV+Combivir (twice-a-day and high-pill burden regimen; BID-high). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 52 of follow-up. Results were evaluated according to intention-to-treat and on-treatment analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in each arm were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar in the three groups. The proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 52 were 74.4, 74.4 and 50.0% for OD group, BID-low group and BID-high group, respectively (P=0.02, ITT analysis). According to on-treatment analysis, the same figures were 88.9, 85.7 and 60% (P<0.02). Overall, 26 (25.5%) patients discontinued treatment for different reasons and immune recovery was similar in all study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Once-a-day HAART with ddl+3TC+EFV is a safe and effective alternative to twice-a-day regimens. Once-a-day therapy, with its simple daily schedule, may be proposed as one of the first choice treatments in HIV infection.
