Effects of emixustat hydrochloride in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of oral emixustat hydrochloride on pro-angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor, as well as other ophthalmic parameters, in subjects with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with PDR, with or without diabetic macular edema (DME), were assigned to emixustat or placebo in daily oral doses ranging from 5 to 40 mg over a step-up titration period, for 84 days. The main outcome measures included levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TGFß-1, and VEGF in the aqueous humor. RESULTS: Seven of 12 subjects (58%) who were randomized to emixustat and 11 of 12 subjects (92%) who were randomized to placebo completed the study. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for changes in any of the aqueous humor cytokines tested. However, median VEGF levels were slightly reduced in the emixustat but not the placebo group (- 70.0 pg/mL versus + 42.7 pg/mL, or - 11.8% versus + 6.7%). In a post hoc analysis of all subjects (with or without DME), statistically significant differences between treatment arms in mean changes from baseline in central subfield thickness (CST; emixustat - 11.9 µm, placebo + 36.2 µm; P = 0.076) and total macular volume (TMV; emixustat - 0.13 mm3, placebo + 0.23 mm3; P = 0.026) were observed, both favoring emixustat. Emixustat's safety profile was consistent with prior studies (i.e., the adverse events of delayed dark adaptation and visual impairment were more common in subjects treated with emixustat). CONCLUSION: Although this pilot study did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in changes in aqueous humor cytokine levels between the emixustat and placebo groups, VEGF levels were slightly reduced in the emixustat but not in the placebo group. In addition, statistically significant differences favoring the emixustat group were observed in CST and TMV among all subjects. These data warrant further investigation of emixustat's potential therapeutic effects in diabetic retinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02753400 (April 2016).

Emixustat Hydrochloride for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether emixustat hydrochloride (emixustat) reduces the rate of enlargement of geographic atrophy (GA) compared with placebo in subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of emixustat over 24 months of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with GA secondary to AMD, a visual acuity score of at least 35 letters, and GA with a total area of 1.25 to 18 mm2 were enrolled. METHODS: Subjects were randomized (1:1:1:1) to emixustat 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, or placebo, administered orally once daily for 24 months. Visits included screening, baseline, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 25. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the mean annual growth rate of total GA area in the study eye, as measured by a central reading center using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. The change from baseline in normal luminance best-corrected visual acuity (NL-BCVA) was a secondary efficacy end point. RESULTS: Of 508 randomized subjects, 320 completed the study. Demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. On average, GA lesions in the study eye grew at a similar rate in each group (emixustat: 1.69 to 1.84 mm2/year; placebo: 1.69 mm2/year; P ≥ 0.81). Changes in NL-BCVA were also comparable between groups. Subjects with a larger low luminance deficit (LLD) at baseline (≥20 letters) demonstrated a more rapid growth of GA over 24 months. No relationship was observed between the risk-allele status of the AMD-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms tested and the growth rate of GA. The most common adverse events in emixustat-treated subjects were delayed dark adaptation (55%), chromatopsia (18%), visual impairment (15%), and erythropsia (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Emixustat did not reduce the growth rate of GA in AMD. The most common adverse events were ocular in nature and likely related to the drug's mechanism of action. Data gained from this study over a 2-year period add to the understanding of the natural history of GA and the baseline characteristics affecting the growth rate of GA.