The Roles of Histidines and Charged Residues as Potential Triggers of a Conformational Change in the Fusion Loop of Ebola Virus Glycoprotein.

Ebola virus (EBOV) enters cells from late endosomes/lysosomes under mildly acidic conditions. Entry by fusion with the endosomal membrane requires the fusion loop (FL, residues 507-560) of the EBOV surface glycoprotein to undergo a pH-dependent conformational change. To find the pH trigger for this reaction we mutated multiple conserved histidines and charged and uncharged hydrophilic residues in the FL and measured their activity by liposome fusion and cell entry of virus-like particles. The FL location in the membrane was assessed by NMR using soluble and lipid-bound paramagnetic relaxation agents. While we could not identify a single residue to be alone responsible for pH triggering, we propose that a distributed pH effect over multiple residues induces the conformational change that enhances membrane insertion and triggers the fusion activity of the EBOV FL.

Ebolavirus entry requires a compact hydrophobic fist at the tip of the fusion loop.

UNLABELLED: Ebolavirus is an enveloped virus causing severe hemorrhagic fever. Its surface glycoproteins undergo proteolytic cleavage and rearrangements to permit membrane fusion and cell entry. Here we focus on the glycoprotein's internal fusion loop (FL), critical for low-pH-triggered fusion in the endosome. Alanine mutations at L529 and I544 and particularly the L529 I544 double mutation compromised viral entry and fusion. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of the I544A and L529A I544A mutants in lipid environments showed significant disruption of a three-residue scaffold that is required for the formation of a consolidated fusogenic hydrophobic surface at the tip of the FL. Biophysical experiments and molecular simulation revealed the position of the wild-type (WT) FL in membranes and showed the inability of the inactive double mutant to reach this position. Consolidation of hydrophobic residues at the tip of FLs may be a common requirement for internal FLs of class I, II, and III fusion proteins. IMPORTANCE: Many class I, II, and III viral fusion proteins bear fusion loops for target membrane insertion and fusion. We determined structures of the Ebolavirus fusion loop and found residues critical for forming a consolidated hydrophobic surface, membrane insertion, and viral entry.

Role of sequence and structure of the Hendra fusion protein fusion peptide in membrane fusion.

Viral fusion proteins are intriguing molecular machines that undergo drastic conformational changes to facilitate virus-cell membrane fusion. During fusion a hydrophobic region of the protein, termed the fusion peptide (FP), is inserted into the target host cell membrane, with subsequent conformational changes culminating in membrane merger. Class I fusion proteins contain FPs between 20 and 30 amino acids in length that are highly conserved within viral families but not between. To examine the sequence dependence of the Hendra virus (HeV) fusion (F) protein FP, the first eight amino acids were mutated first as double, then single, alanine mutants. Mutation of highly conserved glycine residues resulted in inefficient F protein expression and processing, whereas substitution of valine residues resulted in hypofusogenic F proteins despite wild-type surface expression levels. Synthetic peptides corresponding to a portion of the HeV F FP were shown to adopt an α-helical secondary structure in dodecylphosphocholine micelles and small unilamellar vesicles using circular dichroism spectroscopy. Interestingly, peptides containing point mutations that promote lower levels of cell-cell fusion within the context of the whole F protein were less α-helical and induced less membrane disorder in model membranes. These data represent the first extensive structure-function relationship of any paramyxovirus FP and demonstrate that the HeV F FP and potentially other paramyxovirus FPs likely require an α-helical structure for efficient membrane disordering and fusion.

Structure and function of the complete internal fusion loop from Ebolavirus glycoprotein 2.

Ebolavirus (Ebov), an enveloped virus of the family Filoviridae, causes hemorrhagic fever in humans and nonhuman primates. The viral glycoprotein (GP) is solely responsible for virus-host membrane fusion, but how it does so remains elusive. Fusion occurs after virions reach an endosomal compartment where GP is proteolytically primed by cathepsins. Fusion by primed GP is governed by an internal fusion loop found in GP2, the fusion subunit. This fusion loop contains a stretch of hydrophobic residues, some of which have been shown to be critical for GP-mediated infection. Here we present liposome fusion data and NMR structures for a complete (54-residue) disulfide-bonded internal fusion loop (Ebov FL) in a membrane mimetic. The Ebov FL induced rapid fusion of liposomes of varying compositions at pH values at or below 5.5. Consistently, circular dichroism experiments indicated that the α-helical content of the Ebov FL in the presence of either lipid-mimetic micelles or small liposomes increases in samples exposed to pH ≤5.5. NMR structures in dodecylphosphocholine micelles at pH 7.0 and 5.5 revealed a conformational change from a relatively flat extended loop structure at pH 7.0 to a structure with an ∼90° bend at pH 5.5. Induction of the bend at low pH reorients and compacts the hydrophobic patch at the tip of the FL. We propose that these changes facilitate disruption of lipids at the site of virus-host cell membrane contact and, hence, initiate Ebov fusion.

Electrostatic interactions of monoclonal antibodies with subcutaneous tissue.

AIM: The majority of the subcutaneously injected monoclonal antibodies already on the market achieve 50-65% bioavailability, yet the fate of the portion that is lost remains unknown. This consistently incomplete systemic absorption affects the efficacy, safety and overall cost of the drug product. There are many potential factors that might influence the absorption, such as charge, hydrophobicity, formulation variables and the depth and volume of the injection. MATERIALS & METHODS: To explore the possibility that the charge of the injected protein and/or formulation components is partially responsible for drug retention at the subcutaneous site, an ex vivo study, where the monoclonal antibodies were exposed to homogenized rat subcutaneous tissue, was performed. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: It was found that positively charged monoclonal antibodies bind to subcutaneous tissue in a manner that is dependent on ionic strength and pH, suggesting the electrostatic nature of the interaction. As expected, saturation of both nonspecific and electrostatic subcutaneous binding sites was observed after incubation with highly concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions. Additionally, it was demonstrated using model proteins that electrostatic effects of buffer components depend on ionic strength of ions bearing opposite charge rather than total ionic strength of the solution. These results suggest that electrostatic interactions may play a role in absorption processes of positively charged therapeutic proteins after subcutaneous administration.

Magainin 2 revisited: a test of the quantitative model for the all-or-none permeabilization of phospholipid vesicles.

The all-or-none kinetic model that we recently proposed for the antimicrobial peptide cecropin A is tested here for magainin 2. In mixtures of phosphatidylcholine (PC)/phosphatidylglycerol (PG) 50:50 and 70:30, release of contents from lipid vesicles occurs in an all-or-none fashion and the differences between PC/PG 50:50 and 70:30 can be ascribed mainly to differences in binding, which was determined independently and is approximately 20 times greater to PC/PG 50:50 than to 70:30. Only one variable parameter, beta, corresponding to the ratio of the rates of pore opening to pore closing, is used to fit dye release kinetics from these two mixtures, for several peptide/lipid ratios ranging from 1:25 to 1:200. However, unlike for cecropin A where it stays almost constant, beta increases five times as the PG content of the vesicles increases from 30 to 50%. Thus, magainin 2 is more sensitive to anionic lipid content than cecropin A. But overall, magainin follows the same all-or-none kinetic model as cecropin A in these lipid mixtures, with slightly different parameter values. When the PG content is reduced to 20 mol %, dye release becomes very low; the mechanism appears to change, and is consistent with a graded kinetic model. We suggest that the peptide may be inducing formation of PG domains. In either mechanism, no peptide oligomerization occurs and magainin catalyzes dye release in proportion to its concentration on the membrane in a peptide state that we call a pore. We envision this structure as a chaotic or stochastic type of pore, involving both lipids and peptides, not a well-defined, peptide-lined channel.

A quantitative model for the all-or-none permeabilization of phospholipid vesicles by the antimicrobial peptide cecropin A.

The mechanism of the all-or-none release of the contents of phospholipid vesicles induced by the antimicrobial peptide cecropin A was investigated. A detailed experimental study of the kinetics of dye release showed that the rate of release increases with the ratio of peptide bound per vesicle and, at constant concentration, with the fraction of the anionic lipid phosphatidylglycerol in neutral, phosphatidylcholine membranes. Direct measurement of the kinetics of peptide binding and dissociation from vesicles revealed that the on-rate is almost independent of vesicle composition, whereas the off-rate decreases by orders of magnitude with increasing content of anionic lipid. A simple, exact model fits all experimental kinetic data quantitatively. This is the first time that an exact kinetic model is implemented for a peptide with an all-or-none mechanism. In this model, cecropin A binds reversibly to vesicles, which at a certain point enter an unstable state. In this state, a pore probably opens and all vesicle contents are released, consistent with the all-or-none mechanism. This pore state is a state of the whole vesicle, but does not necessarily involve all peptides on that vesicle. No peptide oligomerization on the vesicle is involved; alternative models that assume oligomerization are inconsistent with the experimental data. Thus, formation of well-defined, peptide-lined pores is unlikely.