Antibiotic resistance in wastewater treatment plants: understanding the problem and future perspectives.

Antibiotics residues (AR), antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) are a new class of water contaminants, due to their adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health. Contamination of water bodies occurs mainly by the excretion of antibiotics incompletely metabolized by humans and animals and is considered the main source of contamination of antibiotics in the environment. Given the imminent threat, the World Health Organization (WHO) has categorized the spread of antibiotics as one of the top three threats to public health in the twenty-first century. The Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants (UWWTP) bring together AR, ARB, ARG, making the understanding of this peculiar environment fundamental for the investigation of technologies aimed at combating the spread of bacterial resistance. Several methodologies have been employed focusing on reducing the ARB and ARG loads of the effluents, however the reactivation of these microorganisms after the treatment is widely reported. This work aims to elucidate the role of UWWTPs in the spread of bacterial resistance, as well as to report the efforts that have been made so far and future perspectives to combat this important global problem.

Removal of microorganisms and antibiotic resistance genes from treated urban wastewater: A comparison between aluminium sulphate and tannin coagulants.

The presence of antibiotic resistant-bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in treated effluents of urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) may represent a threat to the environment and public health. Therefore, cost-effective technologies contributing to minimize loads of these contaminants in the final effluents of WWTP are required. This study aimed at assessing the capacity of coagulation to reduce the ARB&ARG load in secondary treated urban wastewater (STWW), as well as the impact of the process on the structure and diversity of the bacterial community. Coagulation performance using aluminium sulphate, a synthetic substance, and tannins, a biowaste, was compared. Samples were analysed immediately before (STWW) and after the coagulation treatment (Alu, Tan), as well as after 3-days storage in the dark at room temperature (RSTWW, RAlu, RTan), to assess possible reactivation events. Both coagulants decreased the turbidity and colour and reduced the bacterial load (16S rRNA gene copy number, total heterotrophs (HET), and ARB (faecal coliforms resistant to amoxicillin (FC/AMX) or ciprofloxacin (FC/CIP) up to 1-2 log immediately after the treatment. Both coagulants reduced the load of intl1, but in average, aluminium sulphate was able to decrease the content of the analysed ARGs (blaTEM and qnrS) to lower levels than tannin. Reactivation after storage was observed mainly in RTan. In these samples the load of the culturable populations and qnrS gene prevalence increased, sometimes to values higher than those found in the initial wastewater. Reactivation was also characterized by an increment in Gammaproteobacteria relative abundance in the bacterial community, although with distinct patterns for RTan and RAlu. Curvibacter, Undibacterium and Aquaspirillum were among the most abundant genera in RAlu and Aeromonas, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas in RTan. These bacterial community shifts were in agreement with the variations in the culturable bacterial counts of HET for RTan and FC/CIP for RAlu. In summary, the overall performance of aluminium sulphate was better than that of tannins in the treatment of treated urban wastewater.