A retrospective review of breast reconstruction outcomes comparing AlloDerm and DermaCELL.

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become an accepted and advantageous adjunct to alloplastic breast reconstruction. The increase in demand has led to an upsurge of dermal-based products, both human and animal derived. There are few direct ADM comparative studies, but it is unclear whether there are any differences in complication rates. Our primary objective was to determine whether there is a difference in outcomes between AlloDerm and DermACELL in immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction. A retrospective chart review of those who underwent immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction from January to December 2016 was performed. This encompassed 64 consecutive patients (95 breasts) with tissue expander or direct-to-implant reconstruction and either AlloDerm or DermACELL ADM. Demographics, particulars of the surgery, additional treatments and complications were all recorded. Differences in seroma, haematoma and infection rates, as well as more serious complications including implant replacement, capsular contracture and failure, were all reviewed. The groups were comparable in terms of age, BMI and relevant comorbidities. Mastectomy weight and resulting implant volume were higher in the DermACELL group, with volume reaching statistical significance (p = 0.001). With an average follow-up of 18 months, there was no difference in capsular contraction or implant replacement. However, in those who developed capsular contracture in the DermACELL group, more breasts had no history of radiation, which was significant (p = 0.042). Overall, there were no significant differences in complication rates of seroma, haematoma, mastectomy flap necrosis and infection.

Structural and electrical cardiac abnormalities are prevalent in asymptomatic adults with myotonic dystrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac disease accounts for a large burden of premature mortality and morbidity in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy (MD). However, little is known about structural cardiac abnormalities particularly in asymptomatic patients with MD. We sought to describe the prevalence and extent of structural cardiac abnormalities in patients with MD and to assess their association with functional, electrical, biochemical and genetic disturbances. METHODS: In this case-control study, 40 adults with MD who had no contraindications to cardiac MRI (CMR) were identified from the Grampian region genetic database. Forty-one age-and-gender-matched healthy volunteers were also recruited. All subjects underwent detailed assessment including CMR, echocardiography, electrocardiography, signal-averaged electrocardiography, Holter monitoring and quantification of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Genetic testing of patients with MD was performed with quantification of CTG trinucleotide repeat sequences. Results of clinical, electrical, genetic and biochemical investigations were correlated with cardiac structural and functional abnormalities detected on CMR. RESULTS: Electrical disturbances including prolongation of PR (187±29 vs 156±23 ms, p<0.001) and QRS intervals (99±11 vs 89±9 ms, p<0.001) were the most prevalent abnormality. Patients with MD had a significantly lower left ventricular (LV) mass (142±44 vs 172±73 g, p=0.03) and lower right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (46±9 vs 50±7%, p=0.02) compared with controls, although LV ejection fraction was similar between the groups (58±8 vs 59±6%, p=0.34). LV non-compaction was also significantly more prevalent in the MD cohort (35% vs 12%, p=0.019). Late gadolinium enhancement was present in 13% of patients with MD. Muscular disability scores correlated with electrical changes (r=0.529, p<0.001); however, the number of CTG repeat sequences did not correlate with either electrical or structural abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MD have a high prevalence of both electrical and structural abnormalities. These include reduced LV mass, impaired RV contractility, a high prevalence of LV non-compaction and myocardial fibrosis. These findings illustrate the potential utility of CMR detecting subclinical disease in otherwise asymptomatic patients with MD.

Genetic polymorphism in ornithine decarboxylase and risk of breast cancer.

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first enzyme in the biosynthesis of polyamines, has increased activity in breast cancer tissue compared with benign and normal tissues. The ODC gene contains a single nucleotide polymorphism in which a guanine is substituted for an adenine. This study investigated whether the ODC +316 G > A polymorphism (rs2302615) was associated with the risk of developing breast cancer. A case-control study involving 121 controls, without breast cancer, 46 patients with breast cancer but without a family history, and 130 breast cancer cases with a family history of breast cancer was conducted. A nested PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism procedure and the TaqMan 5' nuclease assay was used to genotype individuals. Risk was significantly lower for heterozygote (GA genotype) individuals [odds ratio (OR) = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.86, P = 0.018], or individuals with at least one A allele (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92, P = 0.027), without family history. This protective effect of having at least one copy of the variant A allele was not as strong, however, in those with a family history of the disease. In sporadic breast cancer, the presence of at least one A allele is protective against the disease. The influence of this polymorphism may be less important in individuals with an inherited breast cancer predisposition.