Perceived dilemma between protective measures and social isolation in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study among Swiss nursing home directors.

Background: Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) particularly affected older adults, with the highest risks for nursing home residents. Stringent governmental protective measures for nursing homes unintendedly led to social isolation of residents. Nursing home directors (NDs) found themselves in a dilemma between implementing protective measures and preventing the social isolation of nursing home residents. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe protective measures implemented, to investigate NDs' perception of social isolation and its burden for nursing home residents due to these measures, and to explore experiences of NDs in the context of the dilemma. Methods: Cross-sectional embedded mixed-method study carried out by an online survey between April 27 and June 09, 2022, among NDs in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The survey consisted of 84 closed-ended and nine open-ended questions. Quantitative findings were analyzed with descriptive statistics and qualitative data were evaluated using content analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 398 NDs (62.8% female, mean age 55 [48-58] years) out of 1'044 NDs invited.NDs were highly aware of the dilemma. The measures perceived as the most troublesome were restrictions to leave rooms, wards or the home, restrictions for visitors, and reduced group activities. NDs and their teams developed a variety of strategies to cope with the dilemma, but were burdened themselves by the dilemma. Conclusion: As NDs were burdened themselves by the responsibility of how to deal best with the dilemma between protective measures and social isolation, supportive strategies for NDs are needed.

[Implementation of an electronic clinical decision aid to support quality of care for COPD in family medicine]. / Implementierung einer elektronischen Entscheidungshilfe zur Unterstützung der Behandlungsqualität der COPD in der Hausarztmedizin.

BACKGROUND: Electronic clinical decision aids (eCDAs) have the potential to improve the quality of chronic disease management (CDM) and, therefore, patient relevant outcomes. However, eCDAs are only sparsely implemented in primary care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this pilot study was to develop and implement of an eCDA for COPD primary care in two Swiss primary care practices. METHOD: Two primary care practices, each with five primary care physicians and their assistants, participated in the study. The eCDA was developed in collaboration with one of the two GP practices (Practice 1) following a development cycle encompassing alpha- and beta-testing stages. Long-term testing for one year was conducted in both practices. The implementation of the eCDA was evaluated according to the RE-AIM framework counting occurrences as follows: Reach: the number of patients included in the CDM using the eCDA. EFFECTIVENESS: the number of treatment processes initiated per patient. Adoption: practice utilization of the diverse functions featured in the eCDA. Implementation and Maintenance: health care professionals' attitudes towards the impact of the eCDA on the quality of care and their willingness to continue using the eCDA after long-term testing. Data were collected by the eCDA itself, which was programmed to track user data, and from practice staff using questionnaires. RESULTS: Reach: After the long-term test, the number of patients recorded in the eCDA was 28 in practice 1, and 12 in practice 2. EFFECTIVENESS: The number of evidence-based treatment processes per patient was 14 (IQR 6 to 22) in Practice 1 and 6 (IQR 5 to 8) in Practice 2. Adoption: The utilization profiles of the eCDA differed greatly between practices. Implementation and Maintenance: After the long-term test, respondents were more critical of the quality of the CDM for patients with COPD, and attitudes consistent with interprofessional care were more prevalent compared to baseline. Respondents were optimistic regarding both the potential of the eCDA to improve the quality of CDM and their motivation to continue using the eCDA after long-term testing. CONCLUSION: This pilot study is a roadmap for future projects aiming to develop and implement eCDAs for the CDM of COPD in primary care. Future larger implementation studies in this domain should place greater emphasis on the measurement of structural practice characteristics as potential determinants of patient-relevant outcomes. The modifiable determinants should then be tested for their effects on patient-relevant outcomes in a randomized controlled design.

Detection of delirium by family members in the intensive care unit: Translation, Cross-Cultural adaptation and validation of the Family Confusion Assessment Method for the German-Speaking area.

AIM: The aim of this study was the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Family Confusion Assessment Method in critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Delirium is a frequently unrecognized disorder in critically ill patients. Visiting family members might be the first to notice subtle changes in a patient's cognition and behaviour. The Family Confusion Assessment Method was developed to detect delirium by family members, but has not been available for the German-speaking area yet. DESIGN: A prospective validation study was conducted between January 2020 and October 2020. METHODS: The Family Confusion Assessment Method was translated into German according to the Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes. Subsequently, we compared the Family Confusion Assessment Method with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in critically ill patients and their family members in a medical intensive care unit in Germany. RESULTS: We included 50 dyads of critically ill patients and their family members. The prevalence of delirium measured by Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit was 44%. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.84. The German Family Confusion Assessment Method had a high sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 89.3%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 87.5% and 96.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the German Family Confusion Assessment Method is an accurate assessment tool for delirium detection in the intensive care unit by family members. Furthermore, the results indicate that family members may identify delirium by the Family Confusion Assessment Method without prior training. IMPACT: Collaborating medical staff with patients' family members to detect delirium in the intensive care unit may lead to early recognition of delirium.