Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Psychol Health Med ; 29(4): 791-808, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37436407

ABSTRACT

Fibromyalgia is a burdensome pain causing patients a very negative emotional state that can worsen their clinical profile, perceived disability, and treatment outcomes. In particular, anger can negatively affect pain and patient adjustment to the disease. Recent studies suggest that metacognitions and anger rumination can negatively affect anger, which in turn can amplify the intensity of pain. This study aims to investigate whether anger rumination and state anger serially mediate the relationship between metacognitions and the intensity of pain. The study included 446 subjects who: declared having received a fibromyalgia diagnosis by a rheumatologist/pain physician; completed measures of metacognitions, anger rumination, state-anger, and pain intensity. The serial mediation analysis was conducted using Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 6). Negative beliefs about worry and beliefs about the need to control thoughts indirectly influenced the intensity of pain through two significant mediating pathways: state-anger and anger rumination to state-anger. Cognitive self-consciousness affected pain intensity directly (ß = .11, p < .05) and indirectly through two significant mediating pathways: state-anger and anger rumination to state-anger. This study highlights the role of serial mediation of anger rumination and state-anger in the relationship between metacognitions and pain intensity in the field of fibromyalgia. Our work introduces new targets for anger management interventions for patients with fibromyalgia. Such interventions could be effectively addressed with a metacognitive approach considering its specific focus on dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and repetitive negative thinking.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia , Metacognition , Humans , Pain Measurement , Anger , Pain
2.
Ann Ig ; 29(6): 572-583, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29048454

ABSTRACT

Tobacco smoking by young people is of great concern because it usually leads to regular smoking, nicotine addiction and quitting difficulties. Young people "hooked" by tobacco maintain the profits of the tobacco industry by replacing smokers who quit or die. If new generations could be tobacco-free, as supported by tobacco endgame strategies, the tobacco epidemic could end within decades. Smoking prevention programmes for teens are offered by schools with the aim to prevent or delay smoking onset. Among these, the Smoke Free Class Competition (SFC) was widely implemented in Europe. Its effectiveness yielded conflicting results, but it was only evaluated at short/medium term (6 - 18 months). The aim of this study is to evaluate its effectiveness after a longer follow-up (3 to 5 years) in order to allow enough time for the maturing of the students and the internalization of the experience and its contents. Fifteen classes were randomly sampled from two Italian high schools of Bologna province that regularly offered the SFC to first year students; 382 students (174 participating in the SFC and 208 controls) were retrospectively followed-up and provided their "smoking histories". At the end of their last year of school (after 5 years from the SFC), the percentage of students who stated that they were regular smokers was lower among the SFC students than in controls: 13.5% vs 32.9% (p=0.03). From the students' "smoking histories", statistically significant protective ORs were observed for SFC students at the end of 1st and 5th year: 0.42 (95% CI 0.19-0.93) and 0.32 (95% CI 0.11-0.91) respectively. Absence of smokers in the family was also a strongly statistically significant factor associated with being a non-smoker student. These results suggest that SFC may have a positive impact on lowering the prevalence of smoking in the long term (5 years).


Subject(s)
Smoke-Free Policy , Smoking Prevention , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy , Male , Program Evaluation , Schools , Time Factors
3.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 29(1 Suppl A): A64-74, 2007.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17650745

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of patients' opinions and beliefs about their illness is fundamental in interdisciplinary health care interventions. The IPQ and its revised version (IPQ-R) are questionnaires designed to assess components of the mental representation of illness described in Leventhal's self-regulation model. To validate the IPQ-R in the Italian population, verifying its psychometric properties and focusing on Part II of the instrument (opinions about disease), we enrolled 277 inpatients (216 males and 61 females) affected by myocardial infarction (n=70), coronary artery by-pass graft surgery (n=52), chronic heart failure (n=47), valve replacement (n=20), obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome associated to obesity (n=53) and respiratory failure (n=35). All patients completed the Italian version of the IPQ-R obtained by means of 3 translations and a back version. IPQ-R scores were compared to patients' scores on the SF-36 and AD schedule (on anxiety and depression). Structural validity and reliability (both internal and test-retest) of the Italian IPQ-R were assessed. The validity of Part II of the IPQ-R was confirmed. As in the original version, 7 factors were extracted. ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the different diseases. Correlations between IPQ-R and, respectively, the SF-36 and AD schedule were statistically significant and coherent with the constructs analyzed. Finally statistically significant correlations emerged between the IPQ-R factors. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were confirmed. The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the IPQ-R were demonstrated to be robust. Hence, the Italian version of the IPQ-R, which resulted homogeneous with the original version, could be useful in assessing the cognitive factors involved in patients' adjustment to various chronic illnesses.


Subject(s)
Disease/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Psychother Psychosom ; 64(3-4): 162-72, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8657848

ABSTRACT

Anger and hostility have long been considered important factors in the etiology of essential hypertension (EH) and coronary heart disease (CHD). This case-control study investigates the association of hostility, as measured by the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale (HO), and anger, as measured by the Multidimensional Anger Inventory (MAI), with CHD and EH in 80 CHD patients, 80 EH patients, and a control group of 80 healthy adults from Italy. Cases revealed significantly higher scores than controls in two subsets of HO and in two subscales of MAI. Some of these subscales appeared to be age-dependent. The results indicate that particular components of anger-hostility could be taken into consideration when studying psychological risk factors for CHD and EH.


Subject(s)
Anger , Coronary Disease/psychology , Hostility , Hypertension/psychology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...