Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 38(6): 1190-1219, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787762

ABSTRACT

Prior to the 1970s, blending food and liquids and putting them through an enteral access device (EAD) was the most common form of enteral nutrition (EN). However, in the 1970s, blenderized tube feedings (BTFs) became less popular due to the emergence of modern commercial enteral formulas (CEFs). Recently, a cultural shift toward consuming a natural diet, consisting of whole foods, has led to a resurgence in the use of BTF. The increasing use of BTF in a variety of patient care settings identifies a need for practice recommendations that provide guidance for nutrition professionals and patients. Members of the American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Enteral Nutrition Committee identified salient clinical questions concerning BTF, conducted a comprehensive literature search, and subsequently developed practice recommendations pertaining to the use of BTF. This paper was approved by the ASPEN 2022-2023 Board of Directors.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Food, Formulated , Humans , Diet , Nutritional Status , Parenteral Nutrition
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 46(7): 1470-1496, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35838308

ABSTRACT

Enteral nutrition (EN) is a vital component of nutrition around the world. EN allows for delivery of nutrients to those who cannot maintain adequate nutrition by oral intake alone. Common questions regarding EN are when to initiate and in what scenarios it is safe. The answers to these questions are often complex and require an evidence-based approach. The Board of Directors of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) established an Enteral Nutrition Committtee to address the important questions surrounding the indications for EN. Consensus recommendations were established based on eight extremely clinically relevant questions regarding EN indications as deemed by the Enteral Nutrition Committee. These consensus recommendations may act as a guide for clinicians and stakeholders on difficult questions pertaining to indications for EN. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Parenteral Nutrition , Consensus
3.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 35(2): 196-204, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994794

ABSTRACT

Many protocols and steps in the process of enteral nutrition (EN) use are not overly supported with strong research and have been done the same way over many years without questioning the use of best-practices evidence. This article reports many of the myths and unfounded practices surrounding EN and attempts to refute those myths with current evidence. These practices include those about enteral access devices, formulas, enteral administration, and complications.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/methods , Evidence-Based Practice , Food, Formulated , Humans , Parenteral Nutrition Solutions , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...