Treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma using docetaxel and gemcitabine plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.

BACKGROUND: A combination regimen comprised of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was studied in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) to determine its antitumor efficacy and tolerance. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with advanced measurable NSCLC (3 patients with Stage IIIB and 31 patients with Stage IV disease) were treated with an intravenous combination chemotherapy regimen comprised of docetaxel, 80 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), on Days 1 and 10; G-CSF, 5 microg/kg, was administered subcutaneously between Days 2 and 8. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response assessment. A total of 163 courses was administered. RESULTS: Objective tumor response was noted in 17 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval, 32. 5-67.5%), including 2 complete responses (6%) and 15 partial responses (44%). There was no change in 10 patients (29%) and 7 patients developed progressive disease. The median duration of response was 6.5 months (range, 3-15 months) and the median time to disease progression for all patients was 6.8 months (range, 1.8-18 months). The median overall survival time was 13.0 months (range, 2. 5-23+ months) with a 1-year survival rate of 55.8%. Myelosuppression was the most frequently encountered adverse reaction, although World Health Organization Grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia and/or granulocytopenia occurred in only 18% and 24% of patients, respectively. Other toxicities generally were mild to moderate, and always fully reversible. CONCLUSIONS: With a response rate of 50% and a median survival time of 13 months, the drug combination described in the current study appears to have significant activity against advanced metastatic NSCLC. Due to its fairly good tolerance and ease of administration, further investigation of this regimen appears warranted.

A phase II trial of biweekly high dose gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although the novel cytidine analog gemcitabine has shown superior antitumor activity compared with weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. The current Phase II study was initiated to investigate whether this might be achieved by dose intensification. METHODS: Between August 1997 and September 1998, 43 consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicenter Phase II trial. Patients received 4 weekly courses of gemcitabine 2200 mg/m((2)) given as intravenous infusion during 30 minutes on Days 1 and 15 for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of treatment was assessed according to standard criteria, i.e., objective response, progression free survival, and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as >/= 50% reduction in pain intensity, >/= 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or >/= 20 point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for >/= 4 consecutive weeks). RESULTS: Of 43 patients evaluable for objective response, 1 achieved complete and 8 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval, 10-36%); 18 additional patients (42%) had stable and 16 (37%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.3 months. Median survival was 8.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 26.3%. Of 36 patients with tumor-related symptoms who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 16 (44%) experienced significant palliation. The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 6 weeks, and its median duration was 27 weeks. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common side effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly high dose gemcitabine seems to represent a safe, tolerable, and effective regimen for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Mitomycin C, vinorelbine, carboplatin plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic potential of chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) seems modest. Thus, the search for novel agents and combination regimens with a superior therapeutic index has a high priority. The present combination regimen consisting of mitomycin C, vinorelbine, carboplatin and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was chosen because of the known activity of these agents in NSCLC and their potential drug synergism without (nonhematologic) cross-toxicity. To prevent/counteract neutropenia that was assumed to represent the dose-limiting toxicity, the hematopoietic growth factor GM-CSF was routinely adminstered. The objective of our trial was to determine the antitumor efficacy and tolerance of this combination regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with nonresectable, measurable NSCLC (stage IIIB, 7; stage IV, 33) were treated with an intravenous combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1, vinorelbine 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 21, and carboplatin 250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 21; GM-CSF 5 microg/kg was administered subcutaneously on days 2-8 and 22-28. Treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. All patients are evaluable in terms of toxicity and response assessment. A total of 123 courses was administered. RESULTS: Objective tumor response was notes in 16 patients (40%; 95% confidence interval 24.9-56.7%), including 3 (7.5%) complete and 13 partial responses. There was no change in 12 (31.5%) patients, and 12 had progressive disease. Median duration of response was 6 (range 3-15) months, the median time to progression for all patients was 6.2 (range 1-17.5) months, and the projected median survival time was 8.7 (range 1-23.3) months; the 1-year survival rate was 27.5%. Myelosuppression was the most frequently encountered adverse reaction; WHO grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia and/or thrombocytopenia occurred in 42.5 and 12.5%, respectively. Other toxicities were generally mild to moderate, and always fully reversible. CONCLUSION: With a 40% major response rate and disease stabilization in one additional third of our patients, this drug combination seems to have significant activity against advanced metastatic NSCLC. Due to its subjective tolerance and ease of administration, further investigation of this regimen in the palliative-intent care setting seems warranted.