ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to report our experience with interprofessional simulations, executed in a mock-up of a proposed perioperative space, that were designed to elicit valuable end-user feedback on the design of the perioperative space. DESIGN: A styrofoam, life-sized model of a perioperative unit was constructed. Various medical professionals and support staff participated in interactive sessions, including workflow simulations, and provided feedback on the perioperative design. Based on participant feedback, the perioperative design was modified, and the styrofoam model was re-constructed. A second round of sessions was conducted, and the change in participant feedback was analyzed. SETTING: This study took place under the auspices of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, within Penn Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and ninety-three medical professionals and front line operating room staff participated in the initial round of interactive sessions, and 134 participated in the second round (after re-construction). RESULTS: In the first round of simulations and interactive sessions, participants spent 560 hours engaging with the space. Modifications were then made to the perioperative design based on participant feedback, and a second round was conducted, in which participants spent 403 hours in the space. Floor plans for round 2 show significant changes compared with round 1, and mean design satisfaction scores for round 2 (3.78 ± 0.41) were significantly higher than for round 1 (3.61 ± 0.49) (p = 0.02). The quality of feedback was associated with the type of interactive session the user participated in. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that simulations and other interactive sessions, when executed in a mock-up of a proposed perioperative space, can elicit valuable end-user feedback that impacts the final design of the perioperative space and that would traditionally be difficult to obtain until after construction and move-in.
