A preoperative predictive model for prolonged post-anaesthesia care unit stay after outpatient surgeries.

Study objective: To create a preoperative predictive model for prolonged post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay for outpatient surgery and compare with an existing (University of California-San Diego, UCSD) model. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Post-anaesthesia care unit. Patients: Outpatient surgical patients discharged on the same day in a large academic institution. Preoperative data were collected. The study period was three months in 2016. Measurements: Prolonged PACU stay defined as a length of stay longer than the third quartile. We utilized multivariate regression analyses and bootstrapping statistical techniques to create a predictive model for prolonged PACU stay. Main results: Four strong predictors for prolonged PACU stay: general anaesthesia, obstructive sleep apnoea, surgical specialty and scheduled case duration. Our model had an excellent discrimination performance and a good calibration. Conclusion: We developed a predictive model for prolonged PACU stay in our institution. This model is different from the UCSD model probably secondary to local and regional differences in outpatient surgery practice. Therefore, individual practice study outcomes may not apply to other practices without careful consideration of these differences.

Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Ambulatory Patient.

Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are often associated with increased perioperative risks and challenges for the anesthesiologist. This article addresses the current controversies surrounding perioperative care of morbidly obese patients with or without OSA scheduled for ambulatory surgery, particularly in a free-standing ambulatory center. Topics discussed include preoperative selection of obese and OSA patients for ambulatory surgeries, intraoperative methods to reduce perioperative risk, and appropriate postoperative care.

Millennial Resident Study Habits and Factors that Influence American Board of Anesthesiology In-Training Examination Performance: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we described Millennial anesthesiology residents' learning preferences and study habits and how they correlate with performance on the In-Training Exam (ITE). METHODS: A confidential questionnaire including personal characteristics, previous examination performance, study habits, study material preferences, and perceived residency program support was emailed to 1047 anesthesiology residents from 30 ACGME-accredited residency programs across the United States. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve residents (39.4%) responded to the survey, and 240 of those respondents (58.3%) self-reported their 2017 ITE scores. The majority (95.9%) were Millennials. Respondents preferentially used online multiple-choice questions (92.3%) to prepare for the ITE, but many also used traditional anesthesiology textbooks (35.5%) and review books (46.7%). Respondents preferred independent study (94.6%) to group study (5.4%), and handwritten notes (69.4%) to taking notes on a laptop (26.8%) or tablet (3.8%). Less than half (47.5%) of respondents felt supported by their residency program in exam preparation, and 30.7% felt lack of support. Factors correlated with ITE scores on univariate analysis included prior USMLE 1 scores (p < .0000) and USMLE 2 scores (p < .0000), clinical anesthesia year (p < .0000), test anxiety score (p = .0004), prior failure of the basic exam (p = .0026), and prior failure of any board exam (p = .0124). CONCLUSIONS: Millennial learners have consistent performance on ITE exams regardless of personal characteristics, preferred study methods, or materials used. Prior exam performance is the most important predictor of future performance. Currently available study materials are meeting residents' needs and preferences, and while residency program offerings do not affect ITE performance, residents would like to feel more supported.

Efficacy of the CHADS2 scoring system to assess left atrial thrombogenic milieu risk before cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The CHADS2 scoring system was found to be a good predictor for risk stratification of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness of this scoring system in assessing thrombogenic milieu before direct-current cardioversion has not yet fully been established on a large scale. In this study, data from 2,369 consecutive patients in whom transesophageal echocardiography was performed for screening before direct-current cardioversion from 1999 to 2008 were analyzed. Left atrial (LA) or LA appendage (LAA) thrombogenic milieu (spontaneous echo contrast, sludge, and thrombus) was investigated. The results were correlated with CHADS2 score findings. The mean age was 66 ± 13 years, and the ratio of men to women was 2.2:1. CHADS2 scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were present in 11%, 25%, 30%, 22%, 8%, 3%, and 1% of the studies, respectively. The prevalence of LA or LAA sludge or thrombus increased with increasing CHADS2 scores (2.3%, 7%, 8.5%, 9.9%, 12.3%, and 14.1% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or 6, respectively, p = 0.01). In a multivariate model, an ejection fraction ≤20% was the best predictor of LA or LAA sludge or thrombus (odds ratio 2.99, p <0.001). In conclusion, transesophageal echocardiographic markers of thrombogenic milieu were highly correlated with increasing CHADS2 scores in patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion. Giving more value to echocardiographic findings, such as the left ventricular ejection fraction, and its different levels (especially an ejection fraction ≤20%) might improve the precision of the CHADS2 scoring scheme to predict thrombogenic milieu in the left atrium or LAA as a surrogate to cardioembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Transesophageal echocardiography and cardioversion trends in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 10-year survey.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has long been used to assess for left atrial thrombus (LAT) in patients undergoing direct-current cardioversion (DCC) for atrial fibrillation or flutter. However, little is known about its recent trends and current applications. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 3,191 serial transesophageal echocardiographic studies in 2,705 unique patients (mean age, 66 ± 13 years; 68% men) with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who underwent TEE before DCC from 1999 to 2008 were identified using the Cleveland Clinic echocardiography database. Clinical data and information on the presence of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, sludge, or LAT before DCC were obtained as well as the total number of transesophageal echocardiographic studies and DCC procedures performed in outpatient or inpatient settings. RESULTS: Increasing trends of TEE-guided DCC were observed over the past 10 years (25% in 1999, 34% in 2008). TEE-guided DCC was also performed more often in the outpatient setting (21% in 1999, 37% in 2008). There was no yearly difference for the prevalence of LAT or sludge (8% overall; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 10 years, trends have suggested that the application of TEE-guided DCC compared with the conventional approach have consistently grown and that more DCC procedures are done in the outpatient setting. Given the high LAT or sludge detection rate of 8%, TEE-guided DCC has continued to be an important part of atrial fibrillation management.

Indications for TEE before cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: implications for appropriateness criteria.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate appropriateness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before direct current cardioversion (DCC), investigate indications for TEE, and analyze if indications are predictive of outcome. According to American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography 2011 Appropriateness Criteria, TEE is appropriate in the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to facilitate clinical decision making with regards to anticoagulation and/or DCC. However, it is unclear in which instances physicians utilize TEE. We reviewed 671 TEE studies in 604 AF patients (age 66 ± 13 years, 67% male) in which TEE was performed before DCC for left atrial thrombus (LAT)/sludge. Studies were divided by the main indication for TEE into the following 8 categories: 1) congestive heart failure (CHF)/hemodynamic compromise; 2) symptomatic; 3) new onset AF; 4) hospitalized and symptomatic; 5) high stroke risk; 6) subtherapeutic anticoagulation; 7) miscellaneous; and 8) inappropriate for TEE. The main indications for TEE before DCC were symptomatic (26.4%) and CHF/hemodynamic compromise (26.1%). We deemed 2.7% of the studies as inappropriate. LAT/sludge was found in 8.2% of studies. Incidence of LAT/sludge differed significantly between indications (p = 0.0021) and the highest incidences occurred in the high stroke risk (17.6%) and hospitalized and symptomatic (14.1%) categories. No LAT/sludge was found in the miscellaneous or inappropriate groups. Stroke occurred in 2.5% (n = 15) of all patients and in all groups except for miscellaneous and inappropriate (p = 0.3). TEE is appropriately used prior to DCC for patients with the main indications of symptomatic and CHF/hemodynamic compromise. In a minority of studies, TEE utilization was inappropriate. Incidence of LAT/sludge differed between indications.