Coalition for Global Clinical Surgical Education: The Alliance for Global Clinical Training.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the effect of the collaborative relationship between the high-income country (HIC) surgical educators of the Alliance for Global Clinical Training (Alliance) and the low-income country surgical educators at the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences/Muhimbili National Hospital (MUHAS/MNH), Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, on the clinical global surgery training of the HIC surgical residents participating in the program. DESIGN: A retrospective qualitative analysis of Alliance volunteer HIC faculty and residents' reports, volunteer case lists and the reports of Alliance academic contributions to MUHAS/MNH from 2012 to 2017. In addition, a survey was circulated in late 2016 to all the residents who participated in the program since its inception. RESULTS: Twelve HIC surgical educators provided rotating 1-month teaching coverage at MUHAS/MNH between academic years 2012 and 2017 for a total of 21 months. During the same time period 11 HIC residents accompanied the HIC faculty for 1-month rotations. HIC surgery residents joined the MUHAS/MNH Department of Surgery, made significant teaching contributions, performed a wide spectrum of "open procedures" including hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses. Most had had either no or limited previous exposure to hand-sewn anastomoses. All of the residents commented that this was a maturing and challenging clinical rotation due to the complexity of the cases, the limited resources available and the ethical and emotional challenges of dealing with preventable complications and death in a resource constrained environment. CONCLUSIONS: The Alliance provides an effective clinical global surgery rotation at MUHAS/MNH for HIC Surgery Departments wishing to provide such an opportunity for their residents and faculty.

A Consortium Approach to Surgical Education in a Developing Country: Educational Needs Assessment.

IMPORTANCE: Surgical disease is a global health priority, and improving surgical care requires local capacity building. Single-institution partnerships and surgical missions are logistically limited. The Alliance for Global Clinical Training (hereafter the Alliance) is a consortium of US surgical departments that aims to provide continuous educational support at the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (MUHAS). To our knowledge, the Alliance is the first multi-institutional international surgical collaboration to be described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess if the Alliance is effectively responding to the educational needs of MUHAS and Muhimbili National Hospital surgeons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: During an initial 13-month program (July 1, 2013, to August 31, 2014), faculty and resident teams from 3 US academic surgical programs rotated at MUHAS as physicians and teachers for 1 month each. To assess the value of the project, we administered anonymous surveys. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Anonymous surveys were analyzed on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Free-text answers were analyzed for common themes. RESULTS: During the study period, Alliance members were present at MUHAS for 8 months (1 month each). At the conclusion of the first year of collaboration, 15 MUHAS faculty and 22 MUHAS residents completed the survey. The following 6 areas of educational needs were identified: formal didactics, increased clinical mentorship, longer-term Alliance presence, equitable distribution of teaching time, improved coordination and language skills, and reciprocal exchange rotations at US hospitals. The MUHAS faculty and residents agreed that Alliance members contributed to improved patient care and resident education. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A multi-institutional international surgical partnership is possible and leads to perceived improvements in patient care and resident learning. Alliance surgeons must continue to focus on training Tanzanian surgeons. Improving the volunteer surgeons' Swahili-language skills would be an asset. Future efforts should provide more teaching coverage, equitably distribute educational support among all MUHAS surgeons, and collaboratively develop a formal surgical curriculum.

Operation Access: a proven model for providing volunteer surgical services to the uninsured in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that patients without insurance lack coordinated health care and access to surgical procedures. Operation Access (OA) has coordinated uncompensated, low-risk outpatient surgical and specialty services to the uninsured in a volunteer setting for 15 years. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of outpatient surgical care provided by OA volunteers. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from OA's secure database to evaluate the quality of care provided to all patients eligible for OA services from 1994 through 2008. Primary outcomes included quality of care as measured by the Institute of Medicine's six quality aims, ie, safety, efficiency, effectiveness, timeliness, patient-centered care, and equity. RESULTS: Six-thousand five-hundred and forty-two patients were referred to OA during the past 15 years; 83.4% met eligibility criteria. Of these, 3,518 unduplicated patients received 3,098 surgical, endoscopic, and minor procedures. Only 12 of 1,880 surgical patients experienced a complication requiring hospitalization. Patient care was efficient, with a 95.3% overall compliance rate; approximately $7.56 of services were provided for every dollar of philanthropic support. OA's strong emphasis on case management, focus on continuity of care, and patient-selection criteria contributed to the organization's provision of safe, efficient, effective, timely, and patient-centered care. A higher percentage of Latinos and a lower percentage of African Americans relative to the geographic demographics received OA services. CONCLUSIONS: A volunteer program providing low-risk outpatient operations using the OA model delivers safe, efficient, effective, timely, and patient-centered care.

Traditional and novel risk factors for clinically diagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Kaiser multiphasic health checkup cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of risk factors for and early diagnosis of clinically significant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) before rupture is vital to optimize outcomes in these patients. Our aim was to examine traditional and three novel potential risk factors (abdominal obesity, white blood cell count, and kidney function) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA, comprising discharge diagnosis or surgical repair) in a large multiethnic population. METHODS: Cohort study (N =104,813) conducted at an integrated health care delivery system in northern California. RESULTS: After a median of 13 years, 605 AAA events (490 in men and 115 in women; 91 [15%] fatal) were observed. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with risk of clinically detected AAA included male gender, older age, black race (inversely), low educational attainment, cigarette smoking (with dose-response relation), height, treated and untreated hypertension, high total serum cholesterol, elevated white blood cell count, known coronary artery disease, history of intermittent claudication, and reduced kidney function. A significant Asian race by gender interaction was found such that Asian race had a (borderline significant) protective association with AAA in men but not in women. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that major atherosclerotic risk factors, except for diabetes and obesity, are also prospectively related to AAA and suggest that elevated white blood cell count and reduced kidney function may improve risk stratification for clinically relevant AAA.

Dextrocardia with situs inversus totalis: Cardiovascular surgery in three patients with concomitant coronary artery disease.

Three patients with situs inversus totalis (mirror-image dextrocardia) and concomitant coronary artery disease were admitted to our institution for evaluation. In all cases, aortocoronary bypass grafting was successful. Patients with situs inversus and mirror-image dextrocardia are believed to have normal longevity, and, as these studies suggest, they have the same long-term prognosis after coronary bypass grafting as patients with situs solitus.