Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Dermatitis ; 34(3): 175, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36917537
2.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 32(2): 132-136, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31180795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Mirtazapine has traditionally been used for the treatment of major depressive disorder, with an added benefit in patients who have comorbid insomnia or anxiety. Recent studies describe its usefulness in treating refractory pruritus of various causes as well. Our goal is to better define the use of mirtazapine in the treatment of refractory pruritus. METHOD: Through a thorough literature review of PubMed, we identified all reports of the use of mirtazapine for pruritus. RESULTS: Upon examination of 8 supporting articles, we found mirtazapine has quality evidence for the treatment of intra-thecal morphine-induced pruritus. Mirtazapine may also be effective in treating pruritus related to various other conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, cutaneous malignancies (primary or metastatic), hematologic malignancies (lymphomas and leukemias), liver failure, renal failure, cholestasis, as well as pruritus of unknown origin. CONCLUSIONS: Mirtazapine plays a role in treatment for intra-thecel morphine-induced pruritis yet high-quality trials are needed to confirm its efficacy in other dermatologic conditions.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Mirtazapine/therapeutic use , Pruritus/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Pruritus/etiology , Pruritus/pathology , Receptors, Histamine H1/chemistry , Receptors, Histamine H1/metabolism , Receptors, Serotonin/chemistry , Receptors, Serotonin/metabolism
3.
Risk Anal ; 40(5): 902-907, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356927

ABSTRACT

This article analyzes the available evidence to address airborne, aerosol transmission of the SARS-CoV-2. We review and present three lines of evidence: case reports of transmission for asymptomatic individuals in association with studies that show that normal breathing and talking produce predominantly small droplets of the size that are subject to aerosol transport; limited empirical data that have recorded aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 particles that remain suspended in the air for hours and are subject to transport over distances including outside of rooms and intrabuilding, and the broader literature that further supports the importance of aerosol transmission of infectious diseases. The weight of the available evidence warrants immediate attention to address the significance of aerosols and implications for public health protection.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Public Health , Aerosols , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Particle Size , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Transpl Int ; 32(12): 1268-1276, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502728

ABSTRACT

Skin cancer is the most common malignancy affecting solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and SOTR experience increased skin cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. There are no formal multidisciplinary guidelines for skin cancer screening after transplant, and current practices are widely variable. We conducted three rounds of Delphi method surveys with a panel of 84 U.S. dermatologists and transplant physicians to establish skin cancer screening recommendations for SOTR. The transplant team should risk stratify SOTR for screening, and dermatologists should perform skin cancer screening by full-body skin examination. SOTR with a history of skin cancer should continue regular follow-up with dermatology for skin cancer surveillance. High-risk transplant patients include thoracic organ recipients, SOTR age 50 and above, and male SOTR. High-risk Caucasian patients should be screened within 2 years after transplant, all Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, and high-risk African American patients should be screened within 5 years after transplant. No consensus was reached regarding screening for low-risk African American SOTR. We propose a standardized approach to skin cancer screening in SOTR based on multidisciplinary expert consensus. These guidelines prioritize and emphasize the need for screening for SOTR at greatest risk for skin cancer.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Consensus , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Transplant Recipients , United States
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 79(3): 520-524, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29524583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various means to facilit ate accurate biopsy site identification have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of biopsy site identification by using photographs taken with a patient's digital device by a dermatologist versus professional medical photography. METHODS: Photographs of circled biopsy sites were taken with personal digital devices by the principal investigator (PI). Another set of photographs was taken by a professional photographer. Secondary photographs were taken of the biopsy site location pointed to by the staff and PI on the basis of the personal digital device image and professional medical photography, respectively. On the basis of secondary photographs, 2 independent dermatologists determined whether the skin biopsy locations pointed out by the staff were consistent with the ones pointed out by PI. RESULTS: Per dermatologist A, the staff correctly identified all 53 biopsy sites. Per dermatologist B, the staff were correct on 51 of 53 observations. Dermatologist C, the final arbiter, concurred with dermatologist A on the 2 cases in which dermatologist B was not certain of the location of the biopsy site. LIMITATIONS: The mean interval from initial biopsy to reidentification of the site was 36.2 days. CONCLUSION: Utilizing patients' personal digital devices is a cost-effective, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, and readily available means to identify skin biopsy sites.


Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld , Photography/instrumentation , Skin Diseases/pathology , Skin/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Documentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Skin Diseases/surgery
7.
JAMA Dermatol ; 153(3): 296-303, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097368

ABSTRACT

Importance: Skin cancer is the most common malignancy occurring after organ transplantation. Although previous research has reported an increased risk of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs), no study has estimated the posttransplant population-based incidence in the United States. Objective: To determine the incidence and evaluate the risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma (MM), and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in a cohort of US OTRs receiving a primary organ transplant in 2003 or 2008. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study examined 10 649 adult recipients of a primary transplant performed at 26 centers across the United States in the Transplant Skin Cancer Network during 1 of 2 calendar years (either 2003 or 2008) identified through the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database. Recipients of all organs except intestine were included, and the follow-up periods were 5 and 10 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident skin cancer was determined through detailed medical record review. Data on predictors were obtained from the OPTN database. The incidence rates for posttransplant skin cancer overall and for SCC, MM, and MCC were calculated per 100 000 person-years. Potential risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer were tested using multivariate Cox regression analysis to yield adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Results: Overall, 10 649 organ transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 51 [12] years; 3873 women [36%] and 6776 men [64%]) contributed 59 923 years of follow-up. The incidence rates for posttransplant skin cancer was 1437 per 100 000 person-years. Specific subtype rates for SCC, MM, and MCC were 812, 75, and 2 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. Statistically significant risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer included pretransplant skin cancer (HR, 4.69; 95% CI, 3.26-6.73), male sex (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81), white race (HR, 9.04; 95% CI, 6.20-13.18), age at transplant 50 years or older (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.20-3.48), and being transplanted in 2008 vs 2003 (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22-1.94). Conclusions and Relevance: Posttransplant skin cancer is common, with elevated risk imparted by increased age, white race, male sex, and thoracic organ transplantation. A temporal cohort effect was present. Understanding the risk factors and trends in posttransplant skin cancer is fundamental to targeted screening and prevention in this population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Melanoma/epidemiology , Organ Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/ethnology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Melanoma/ethnology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Skin Neoplasms/ethnology , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Risk Anal ; 37(5): 918-929, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27393372

ABSTRACT

This study's objective is to assess the risk of asbestos-related disease being contracted by past users of cosmetic talcum powder.  To our knowledge, no risk assessment studies using exposure data from historical exposures or chamber simulations have been published. We conducted activity-based sampling with cosmetic talcum powder samples from five opened and previously used containers that are believed to have been first manufactured and sold in the 1960s and 1970s.  These samples had been subject to conflicting claims of asbestos content; samples with the highest claimed asbestos content were tested.  The tests were conducted in simulated-bathroom controlled chambers with volunteers who were talc users.  Air sampling filters were prepared by direct preparation techniques and analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) spectra, and selective area diffraction (SAED).  TEM analysis for asbestos resulted in no confirmed asbestos fibers and only a single fiber classified as "ambiguous."  Hypothetical treatment of this fiber as if it were asbestos yields a risk of 9.6 × 10-7 (under one in one million) for a lifetime user of this cosmetic talcum powder.  The exposure levels associated with these results range from zero to levels far below those identified in the epidemiology literature as posing a risk for asbestos-related disease, and substantially below published historical environmental background levels.  The approaches used for this study have potential application to exposure evaluations of other talc or asbestos-containing materials and consumer products.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/toxicity , Powders/toxicity , Risk Assessment/methods , Talc/toxicity , Air , Asbestos/analysis , Cosmetics/analysis , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Microscopy, Phase-Contrast , Mineral Fibers/analysis , Mineral Fibers/toxicity , Occupational Exposure , Powders/analysis , Probability , Respiration , Talc/analysis , Thermogravimetry , X-Rays
9.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 39(2): e19-e22, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27831940

ABSTRACT

Eutectic mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine (EMLA AstraZeneca, DE) is a widely used topical anesthetic cream for preprocedural cutaneous analgesia. In addition to potential clinical cutaneous and systemic adverse effects, EMLA may also induce microscopic changes detectable by light and electron microscopy leading to difficulty in accurate diagnosis. We report the case of a biopsy demonstrating EMLA-induced histopathologic changes. The biopsy was taken from the back of a 5-month-old infant and submitted to rule out psoriasis. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the biopsy demonstrated spongiosis and a noninflammatory subepidermal bulla, raising the histopathologic possibility of epidermolysis bullosa. Further investigation confirmed that EMLA was applied under occlusion before biopsy. A second biopsy without topical anesthetic did not demonstrate a bulla and supported the clinical diagnosis of psoriasiform dermatitis. Our case highlights the importance of awareness of EMLA-induced histopathologic changes to avoid potential misdiagnosis. The histopathologic findings of this case in conjunction with other previously reported cases of EMLA-induced bullae were analyzed. Vacuolization of the basal and suprabasilar layer, pallor and swelling of upper layer epidermal keratinocytes, a pauci-inflammatory cleavage beneath or within the basal layer, basophilic granular karyorrhectic debris in the subepidermal cleft, and congestion of papillary dermal vessels characterized the biopsy findings of this localized adverse reaction.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/pathology , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Prilocaine/adverse effects , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/chemically induced , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Infant , Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination , Psoriasis/diagnosis
12.
Dermatol Online J ; 22(1)2016 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990480

ABSTRACT

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common pemphigoid disorder, which is localized in approximately 16-29% of cases. A small subset of localized BP cases is associated with prior radiation therapy, most commonly for breast carcinoma. We present a patient with an unusual presentation of localized BP after receiving partial accelerated breast irradiation (a type of brachytherapy that has a decreased amount of radiation to the skin as compared to the more common external beam radiation therapy).


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Pemphigoid, Bullous/etiology , Radiation Injuries/complications , Skin/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Pemphigoid, Bullous/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Skin/radiation effects
13.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 27(4): 355-8, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26558635

ABSTRACT

Common warts (verruca vulgaris) are one of the most common problems encountered in dermatology and may present a difficult treatment dilemma, as no particular therapy has demonstrated complete efficacy. Intralesional injection of purified Candida antigen has produced impressive treatment results in small prospective and retrospective studies and is thought to produce its effect through stimulation of a cell-mediated immune response. We report a retrospective study of adult and pediatric patients treated with Candida antigen therapy in clinical practice. Of the 100 patients treated, 80% responded to therapy: 39% demonstrated a complete response and 41% demonstrated a partial response. In addition, 6 out of 7 immunocompromised patients who were treated demonstrated a partial or complete response. Injections were generally well-tolerated and adverse events were minimal and short-lived. Our data indicate that intralesional Candida antigen therapy for cutaneous warts is an efficacious option in a clinical practice setting. The treatment may also be effective in immunosuppressed patients with cutaneous warts. Our results add to the literature one of the largest retrospective series reported to date and treatment outcomes are similar to previously reported studies evaluating this therapeutic modality.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Fungal/administration & dosage , Warts/therapy , Adult , Candida , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunotherapy/methods , Injections, Intralesional , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
15.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 28(4): 461-2, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424941

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 56-year-old black woman with rheumatoid arthritis who developed worsening fatigue, fever, weight loss, and a vesiculobullous skin eruption while being treated with certolizumab pegol for her arthritis. Microscopic findings confirmed the diagnosis of a neutrophilic dermatosis.

16.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 73(4): 666-71, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple devices and coatings assist with endovascular insertion of sheaths, catheters, and guide wires. Hydrophilic polymer coatings, a common component of endovascular surgical devices, reportedly cause microvascular obstruction and embolization, with various sequelae in organs and soft tissue. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe clinical and histopathologic features of cutaneous manifestations of hydrophilic polymer gel emboli. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of 8 patients with cutaneous complications of hydrophilic polymer gel emboli who presented in May 2013 through February 2015. RESULTS: Sudden onset of lower extremity livedo racemosa, purpuric patches, or both, occurred hours to days after endovascular procedures involving the aorta. Histopathologic evaluation showed basophilic lamellated material, consistent with hydrophilic polymer gel emboli, within small dermal vessels. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study with small sample size and not controlled for all similar procedures in this population. CONCLUSION: Hydrophilic polymer gel coatings in endovascular devices can embolize to skin and cause microvascular occlusion, presenting as livedo racemosa, purpura, or both. Given the number of patients observed over a short period, this phenomenon may be underappreciated. Hydrophilic polymer gel emboli should be considered in differential diagnosis of livedo racemosa and purpura after endovascular procedure.


Subject(s)
Coated Materials, Biocompatible/adverse effects , Embolism/etiology , Embolism/pathology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Polymers/adverse effects , Skin Diseases/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Catheters/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sampling Studies , Skin Diseases/pathology
17.
Indian Dermatol Online J ; 6(4): 284-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26225337
18.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 72(6): 1066-73, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25840731

ABSTRACT

The umbilicus may be the site of congenital and acquired malformations and may harbor clinical clues to the diagnosis of potentially fatal inherited disorders, primary skin conditions, and a variety of infectious diseases. Both benign and malignant tumors may involve the umbilicus, and some are unique to this site. Finally, cutaneous signs localized to this anatomic location may be found in diverse systemic diseases.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/congenital , Skin Diseases/pathology , Umbilicus/abnormalities , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/microbiology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/physiopathology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/physiopathology , Umbilicus/physiopathology
19.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 14(2): 115-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25689805

ABSTRACT

Frequent causes of morbidity secondary to herpes zoster include acute pain, secondary infection, and postherpetic neuralgia. A less documented complication is pruritus, which can be either acute or postinfectious when it persists more than 3 months after the rash has healed. We discuss a case of severe, acute neuropathic pruritus and pain secondary to active herpes zoster that was unresponsive to standard medical therapy, including oral antihistamines, topical lidocaine, oral gabapentin, and local wound care. Modest control of the pruritus and pain was achieved with continued multimodal therapy and the addition of topical 2% amitriptyline/0.5% ketamine gel.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/drug therapy , Pruritus/drug therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Amitriptyline/administration & dosage , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Gels , Herpes Zoster/complications , Humans , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pruritus/virology
20.
Indian Dermatol Online J ; 6(6): 419-21, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26753143
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...