ABSTRACT
Food insecurity is a rising concern for US households and leads to adverse child health outcomes. Pediatric gastroenterology providers are uniquely equipped to help guide families experiencing this challenge given their specialized training in nutritional support and dietary therapy for disease management. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate food insecurity screening practices from the perspectives of patient caregivers and healthcare providers in a tertiary pediatric gastroenterology practice. A survey was administered to 1279 caregivers and 121 providers. Of the 248 completed caregiver responses, 10%-15% reported being asked about food insecurity. Among the 36 healthcare provider responses, 53% expressed comfort in conducting food insecurity screening but only 14% routinely screened. The most cited barrier to screening was the lack of readily available patient resources. Further research is imperative to address these screening barriers and assess the impact of food insecurity screening and interventions on pediatric gastrointestinal health outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Celiac disease (CD) mass screening remains controversial in part because of a paucity of data to support its benefit. The Autoimmunity Screening for Kids study is a mass screening study for pediatric CD and type 1 diabetes in Colorado. METHODS: This study prospectively follows up children ages 1 to 17 years who screened positive for tissue transglutaminase IgA autoantibodies in the Autoimmunity Screening for Kids study subsequently referred for diagnostic evaluation. Children diagnosed with CD by biopsy or serologic criteria were included in this study. Evaluation at baseline and 12 month follow-up evaluation included demographics, laboratory studies, symptoms, health-related quality of life, anxiety/depression, and gluten-free diet adherence. Paired Student t test, chi-square, and Wilcoxon sign rank tests compared baseline and follow-up data. For symptom scores, odds of improvement were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 52 children with CD enrolled, 42 children completed 12-month follow-up evaluation. On the symptom questionnaire completed at diagnostic evaluation, 38 of 42 children reported 1 or more symptoms. CD mean symptom severity and frequency scores improved from baseline to follow-up evaluation (P < .001). Reported health-related quality of life scores improved among caregivers (P = .002). There was no significant change in reported anxiety or depression. Iron deficiency without anemia was common at baseline (21 of 24 children; 87.5%) and normalized at follow-up evaluation (11 of 21 children; 52.3%). Twenty-six of 28 families reported good or excellent gluten-free diet adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This novel study of children with CD identified through a mass screening program demonstrated improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and iron deficiency after 1 year follow-up evaluation. This demonstrates that there may be benefit to CD mass screening.
ABSTRACT
One promising though understudied approach to addressing race/ethnic disparities in teen pregnancy rates is through sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming for young men. This pilot study assessed the feasibility, quality, and preliminary efficacy of Manhood 2.0-a group-based, after-school SRH program for young Black and Latino men, which examines gender norms. This mixed-methods study describes program attendance and quality; participant experiences and engagement in the program; and changes in participant gender norms, knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and social support. Quantitative data from baseline and post-intervention surveys (n = 51) were analyzed using paired t-tests and McNemar's tests. Qualitative data from five post-intervention focus groups (n = 27) were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes. At baseline, participants were ages 15 to18 years (M = 16.4 years), 30% were Latino, 66% were Black, 34% ever had sex, and 44% of sexually active participants had sex without any contraceptive method or condom. Quality ratings by program observers were high. The majority of participants (61%) attended at least 75% of sessions, and 96% rated Manhood 2.0 as "very good" or "excellent." Pre-post comparisons showed increases in receipt of SRH information; contraception knowledge; positive attitudes about supporting partners in pregnancy prevention; self-efficacy in partner communication about sex; discussing program content with friends and family; and social competence and support. Focus group participants described benefits from the Manhood 2.0 content (i.e., full range of contraceptive methods, sexual consent, gender norms) and delivery (i.e., reflective discussion, nonjudgmental facilitators). Findings suggest that Manhood 2.0 is a promising SRH program for young men.
