Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 41(4): 798-807, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877691

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of mental health conditions and burnout among practising optometrists in Australia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of registered practising Australian optometrists was undertaken over a three-week period from mid-November 2019. The survey comprised three well-established mental health scales (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K10], Depression Anxiety Stress Scales [DASS-21] and Maslach Burnout Inventory [MBI]) and an open-ended question inviting comments. RESULTS: Five hundred and five respondents completed the K10, representing 8.8% of registered optometrists in Australia; 466 completed all three scales. Prevalence of moderate to severe psychological distress (K10 ≥ 25) was 30.7% (95% CI 26.7%-34.7%), with similar findings for depression and anxiety (DASS-21). Prevalence of high burnout, as indicated by MBI-GS exhaustion was 56.1% (95% CI 51.7%-60.4%), cynicism 57.1% (95% CI 52.7%-61.5%) and professional efficacy 23.1% (95% CI 19.4%-26.8%). Optometrists aged ≤ 30 years were 3.5 times more likely to report moderate to severe psychological distress compared to optometrists aged >30 years (OR = 3.54, P < 0.001, 95% CI 2.38-5.25). The most frequently mentioned work-related issues concerned retail pressures, workload and career dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of mental health conditions and burnout reported by practising Australian optometrists were high compared with the general population and other health professionals. Younger age and burnout were significant risk factors for psychological distress. Interventions are required to address these issues, particularly for younger optometrists, and could include workplace modifications and building resilience to improve personal mental wellbeing and ensure patient safety.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Optometrists , Australia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Vision Res ; 45(6): 715-20, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15639498

ABSTRACT

To investigate how age affects peripheral refraction we measured objective peripheral refraction for 55 young subjects (24+/-4 years) and 41 older subjects (59+/-3 years) out to 35 degrees eccentricity in temporal and nasal visual fields. Subjects were compared in 1D subgroups based on central spherical equivalent refractions (low hypermetropes +0.54 D to +1.51 D, emmetropes +0.50 D to -0.49 D, low myopes -0.50 D to -1.49 D, moderate myopes -1.50 D to -2.58 D). Overall, young and older subjects with similar refractive corrections had similar peripheral refraction components. Both age groups showed relative hypermetropic shifts in the peripheral fields as myopia increased and also decreases in peripheral astigmatism J180 as myopia increased. J45 varied little across the visual field with linear relationships occurring between J45 and visual field angle for all but one subgroup (older emmetropes). Peripheral refraction in emmetropes to moderate myopes is relatively unaffected by age for healthy eyes of similar refractive errors.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Refractive Errors/physiopathology , Adult , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Humans , Hyperopia/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Myopia/physiopathology , Visual Fields/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...