Cost-effectiveness of herpes simplex virus type 2 serologic testing and antiviral therapy in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether serologic testing for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) in pregnant women and their partners is cost-effective. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of providing type-specific serologic testing at week 15 of pregnancy for all women unaware of their HSV-2 status, and offering antiviral suppressive therapy from week 36 until delivery to all seropositive women. This scenario was compared with current care, in which only a minority of women diagnosed with genital herpes (GH) receives antiviral suppressive therapy (AST). In a third scenario, testing is offered to partners of pregnant women who test seronegative, and antiviral suppressive therapy is offered to the partners who test seropositive. RESULTS: Compared with current care, offering testing and antiviral suppressive therapy to 100,000 pregnant women resulted in an incremental cost of $3.1 million, 15.7 fewer cases of neonatal herpes, 186 fewer cesarean deliveries, and an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life- year gained (QALY) of $18,680. Offering testing and suppressive therapy to both the pregnant women and their partners resulted in an increased cost of $8.6 million, 16.8 fewer cases of neonatal herpes, 192 fewer cesarean deliveries, and an incremental cost per QALY of $48,946 compared with no testing. CONCLUSION: Compared with commonly accepted benchmarks for cost-effectiveness (<$50,000/QALY), type-specific HSV-2 serologic testing of pregnant women may be a cost-effective strategy.

A United States compassionate use study of lamivudine treatment in nontransplantation candidates with decompensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis.

Patients with hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis have limited treatment options. This prospective, multicenter study assessed lamivudine in 75 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the majority of whom (93%) were not candidates for liver transplantation. At baseline, all 75 patients tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg (+)] and 62% tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg (+)]. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were detectable in 64% of patients by the branched chain DNA (bDNA) assay. Patients received lamivudine 100 mg once daily (median duration, 12.7 months; range, 0.5 to 33 months). In patients with detectable HBV DNA pretreatment, the virus became undetectable by the bDNA assay in 69% of patients with > or = 6 months treatment and in 64% overall. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level improved in 90% and normalized in 55% of patients with > or = 6 months treatment and in 48% overall. Improvements in bilirubin and albumin levels occurred throughout treatment. The median Child-Pugh score improved from a baseline of 10 to 8 at last visit, with 31% (23/75) having an improved score of > or = 2 points, 57% (43/75) unchanged (< 2 points), and 12% (9/75) worsened (> or = 2 points). A virologic breakthrough developed in eight of 41 patients (18%) after a median of 13.1 months of treatment. Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) variant HBV was detected in three of four patients tested. Nevertheless, at last visit, ALT, albumin, and bilirubin levels were similar for patients with and without breakthrough. Lamivudine treatment can lead to significant improvements in liver disease severity in nontransplantation candidates with advanced disease. Additional studies of lamivudine in combination with other antivirals are indicated for the large population of patients worldwide with advanced HBV-related cirrhosis and inadequate access to liver transplantation.

Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data on the long-term safety of lamivudine are limited. The aim of this analysis was to determine the incidence of hepatitis flares, hepatic decompensation, and liver-disease-related (LDR) serious adverse events (SAE) during long-term lamivudine treatment. METHODS: We reviewed data on 998 patients with HBeAg-positive compensated chronic hepatitis B who received lamivudine for up to 6 years (median, 4 years) and 200 patients who received placebo for 1 year. RESULTS: Hepatitis flares occurred in 10% of the lamivudine-treated patients in year 1 and in 18%-21% in years 2-5. A temporal association between hepatitis flares and lamivudine-resistant mutations increased from 43% in year 1 to >80% in year 3. Ten hepatic decompensation events occurred in 8 (<1%) lamivudine-treated patients. Fifty-three (5%) lamivudine-treated patients experienced a total of 60 LDR SAEs. Four patients died, 2 from liver-related causes. The proportion of patients with a documented lamivudine-resistant mutation increased from 23% in year 1 to 65% in year 5. During each year of the study, patients with lamivudine-resistant mutations experienced significantly more hepatitis flares than patients without lamivudine-resistant mutations (P < 0.005). The occurrence of hepatic decompensation (0%-2%) and LDR SAEs (1%-10%) among patients with lamivudine resistance remained stable during the first 4 years with mutations and increased afterward to 6% (P = 0.03) and 20% (P = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that lamivudine treatment for up to 6 years has an excellent safety profile in patients with HBeAg-positive compensated liver disease, but patients with long-standing lamivudine-resistant mutations may experience worsening liver disease.